Finally, someone in allopathic medicine has a conscience about expressing the harms of the HPV vaccine Gardasil®, and has published scientific concerns in the American College of Pediatricians (ACP) January 2016 online webpage . Thank you is my very first comment but, if you will pardon my second, what kept you silent for ten long-suffering years for thousands, if not millions, of young women whose lives have been changed for the worse after receiving Gardasil®? 
Dr Scott S Field, MD, is the principal author of a “stunning” article of sorts in that it comes from a medical doctor, a member of the very profession that is pushing and ‘demanding’ girls and boys take the HPV vaccines. If Dr Field has become enlightened as to what’s been going on for ten years regarding the HPV vaccines, my respectful suggestion is that he take a look into all the other vaccines because the very vaccine components he questions, e.g., polysorbate 80 (aka Tween 80® and aluminum adjuvants—four in total) are also found in many other vaccines, as verified in the CDC’s Pink Book “Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary” .
AP WP Responsive
Dr Field, while you’re checking the biochemical reactions of vaccine ingredients, would you kindly check out L-histindine in both Gardasil® and Gardasil 9®? Oh, and how about the sodium borate, which is used as an insecticide!
The article states:
Few other vaccines besides Gardasil® that are administered in adolescence contain polysorbate 80. Pre-licensure safety trials for Gardasil® used placebo that contained polysorbate 80 as well as aluminum adjuvant… 
DTap Infarix®, by the way, given to infants contains aluminum adjuvant (Al hydroxide) and polysorbate 80! So do DTap Kinrix® (Al hydroxide), DTaP-HepB-IPN Pediarix® (Al phosphate), Dtap Boostrix® (Al hydroxide), Prevnar 13® (Al phosphate), DTaP-IPV-Hib Pentacel® (Al phosphate) all contain polysorbate 80. 
Will you please look into those vaccines, Dr. Field, as they are given to children?
For the record, both Gardasil® and Gardasil 9® contain Aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate and polysorbate 80.
Medicine, especially the ACP, must demand to know why there is so much ADD, ADHD, ASD occurring in children when those conditions were not on medicine’s radar screen prior to the 1980s when vaccines took off like greased lightning.
Another rather foolhardy practice to research, while I’m offering suggestions, is to investigate the engrained practice of giving nine (9) vaccine actives during one “well baby” office visit.
Can you please explain how an infant weighing less than 25 pounds is expected to handle nine disease organisms being introduced into the body at one time? How is an immune system to respond to such an overload? Short circuits? Nowhere in life and living—not even in the jungles—could a human being be exposed to nine different diseases at one time!
Still, medicine and pharmacology demand that a baby, whose immune systems is not fully developed until 2 or 3 years of age, gets exposed to nine diseases at once and expected to build immunity. What you get is an adaptive immune response, not an innate immune response! Don’t you understand that? Biochemical intervention actually is castrating the undeveloped immune system. Where were professional, biochemical and biological brains when thinking out that paradigm?
Getting back to Dr Field’s exceptional paper, which I compliment highly for the courage to stand up and be in the counted category, it states in minuscule part, what activists, in particular SaneVax, have been reporting in their work of advocacy on behalf of HPV-damaged victims globally:
– Premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as premature menopause.
At least that’s a start and some recognition—but not enough!
However, there are more devastating VAERS statistics regarding HPV vaccines than what Dr Field cites in his ground-breaking article. According to VAERS as posted to December 2015  there are:
Dr Field, may I suggest you check out my 2013 book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, as it’s the only book to date that I know of that discusses and cites published peer review literature detailing what various toxic chemicals and neurotoxins in vaccines do biochemically in vitro and in vivo.
However, I do want to thank you—seriously—for poking a hole into the side of Big Pharma’s “sacred cow”—vaccines! You are a credit to the medical profession; please don’t stop now. There’s so much more to uncover, if only you will be permitted to look.
Snopes / On Gardasil (a disinformation campaign?)http://www.snopes.com/medical/drugs/gardasil.asp
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)
Thousands of teenage girls report feeling seriously ill after routine school cancer vaccination.
This article created significant debate among medical professionals, journalists and members of the public. Some commentators felt the piece had been insufficiently specific about the fact that research has established no causal link between the symptoms experienced by Miss Ryalls and the HPV vaccine. In fact, that point was set out in the piece; it certainly is not in dispute.
Nevertheless, a number of amendments to the item have subsequently been made, notably to: clarify that reports of ‘adverse drug reactions’ to the HPV vaccine are all categorised as ‘suspected’; add a reference to the fact that one of the criteria by which such ‘ADRs’ can be classified as ‘serious’ is if the individual reporting the side effects describes them as ‘serious’ themselves; and make clear that, while thousands of girls have reported feeling unwell after receiving the vaccine, that cannot be extrapolated as meaning that thousands of girls have ‘suffered debilitating illness’ after being vaccinated.
Readers who are interested in this topic may like to read another report recently published in the Independent on Sunday on the question of whether the HPV vaccine should be extended to boys: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/professor-harald-zur-hausen-nobel-scientist-calls-for-hpv-vaccination-for-boys-10382796.html. 14/7/15
When Caron Ryalls was asked to sign consent forms so that her then 13-year-old daughter, Emily, could be vaccinated against cervical cancer, she assumed it was the best way to protect Emily’s long-term health.
Yet the past four years have turned into a nightmare for the family as Emily soon suffered apparent side effects. Only two weeks after her first HPV injection, the teenager experienced dizziness and nausea.
“The symptoms grew increasingly worse after the second and third injections, and I went to A&E several times with severe chest and abdominal pains as well as difficulty breathing,” Emily, now 17, said. “One time I couldn’t move anything on one side of my body. I didn’t know what was happening.”
Related story: Nobel scientist calls for HPV vaccination for boys
Emily is one of the thousands of teenage girls who have reported feeling seriously unwell following the routine vaccination since the immunisation programme was introduced in 2007. She is yet to recover and has no idea when her health will return to normal. vaccine1“Prior to the vaccination Emily had an ‘unremarkable’ medical history with no problems,” said Mrs Ryalls, 49, from in Ossett, West Yorkshire. “She was considered very healthy and represented the school at hockey, netball, athletics and was a keen dancer. She was also a high achiever at school, in the top sets for everything and predicted at least 10 GCSE with high grades. Her future was very bright.”
This Mother Wants You To See What An HPV Vaccine Injury Looks Like
So often we hear about how the benefits of vaccines “outweigh the risks” of disease, but for parents dealing with a child who has been severely vaccine injured, this statement can be seen as a menace to their unimaginable pain.
The HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Cervarix) are among the most controversial of the current vaccine schedule. The source of this controversy is the alarming number of adverse reactions being reported, such as the one seen in the video below.
While defenders of HPV vaccines commonly argue that no link can be clearly defined between the number of adverse reactions reported to VAERS and the Gardasil/Cervarix vaccine, many remain unconvinced of its innocence, especially when an otherwise healthy child begins exhibiting injury symptoms immediately after receiving the vaccine.
Is the medical establishment doing its due diligence in explaining all of the risks involved with vaccinations? Are parents making truly informed decisions about vaccines? Surely every parent should be going into such a decision armed with as much knowledge of the potential outcomes as possible, yet time and time again, especially with regard to HPV vaccines, parents are left to deal with the unfortunate repercussions of being uninformed.
The mother of this vaccine injured child has decided to showcase her challenges to the public, with hopes that some will see exactly what it means to deal with the consequences of an uninformed medical decision. To follow her story, see this link to her Facebook page.
Massive Vaccine Cover-Up JANUARY 28, 2016
New evidence shows that members of a global vaccine committee may have been involved in a massive cover-up regarding the safety of the HPV vaccine. State-based action alerts!
Earlier this month, Cornell-trained clinical pathologist Sin Hang Lee, MD, sent an open letter to the director general of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan, alleging that members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) are guilty of gross misconduct and criminal malfeasance in their efforts to mislead the global public on the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
The controversy revolves around Dr. Lee’s study finding that Gardasil (Merck’s HPV vaccine) contains HPV L1 gene DNA fragments. In a separate case study, Dr. Lee found HPV-16 L1 DNA fragments in post-mortem blood samples of a teenager who died six months after receiving three Gardasil injections. Dr. Lee hypothesizes that the HPV L1 gene DNA fragments bind to aluminum adjuvants in the vaccine and are carried through the blood stream by macrophages to the brain, causing the adverse effects many experience after receiving HPV shots. Based on this evidence, Dr. Lee called for further study of the HPV vaccines.
One would think the scientific community would take heed—especially scientists on the GACVS, who are responsible for advising the world on vaccine safety. Aluminum in vaccines is a serious issue that we’ve addressed at length in previous coverage. There are studies that have linked aluminum to all kinds of negative health effects ranging from autism to Alzheimer’s disease. Other researchers have noted that, despite eighty years of use, the safety of aluminum adjuvants rests largely on assumptions rather than experimental evidence.
Emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request indicate that members of GACVS saw Dr. Lee as an inconvenient adversary to their pro-vaccine agenda from the start. Note that this was all taking place before a public hearing in Japan to determine whether or not the Japanese government would recommend the vaccine to its citizens. Because there were no peer-reviewed studies refuting Dr. Lee’s claims, GACVS needed to get creative to reassure the Japanese government that the HPV vaccine was totally safe and Dr. Lee’s findings could be ignored.
GACVS did this through a presentation at the hearing and an official statement afterward. However, as Dr. Lee argues in his open letter, the official statement contains numerous—and in his view, intentional—misrepresentations of peer-reviewed science that conflate the facts in an attempt to mislead the public. Dr. Lee also alleges that members of GACVS knew that the HPV vaccine, more so than other vaccines, caused an increased inflammatory response and the release of cytokines and tumor necrosis factors (TNF)—yet still assured the public that the HPV vaccine was safe. Release of TNF can causecell death and a wide range of inflammatory reactions—including death in some instances.
GACVS admits in its statement that it did not even review Dr. Lee’s work but claims it was reviewed by a “panel of experts.” No names are provided, nor are any further credentialing details about this “panel.”
Dr. Lee’s letter cites many more instances of GACVS scrambling to refute the science by misstating the facts and misleading the non-scientific public. Interested readers should consult Dr. Lee’s full letter for a more detailed account of this shameful, possibly criminal, manipulation of the facts.
This is only the latest cause for concern in regard to the HPV vaccine’s safety. You can consult our previous coverage for more of that information, especially of the former Merck doctor who said that Gardasil would become the “greatest medical scandal of all time.” There have also been as-yet-unexplained (or even acknowledged) cover-ups of other vaccine research as well, for example the decision to hide evidence that the MMR vaccine caused autism among black male infants.
Science is ever-evolving, with new evidence coming to light all of the time which throws doubt on previously held assumptions. What this scandal shows is that the proponents of the vaccine industry, who consistently and vehemently claim the mantle of “science” to defend their elimination of our freedoms, care less about the actua
l science than about pushing their own agenda, regardless of the evidence or the cost in human life—the very antithesis of the scientific method. Unfortunately, governments and world health organizations are now integrated into the vaccine industry in a way that can only be described as cronyism.