The Fallacy of Doctors being ‘Experts’ in Infectious Disease Control

Newsletter 210 The Fallacy of Doctors being ‘Experts’ in Infectious Disease Control

12 September 2018

Read More At Judy Wilyman 

In the 21st century the control of infectious diseases is being promoted to the community by “medical doctors” when throughout history this area of health was not included in traditional medicine. This is because infectious diseases were always considered a public health issue and controlled in the field of Social Medicine: the field of ‘medicine’ that uses political and economic decisions to make changes to the environment and lifestyle of communities to improve public health.

Public health was incorporated into the field of medicine in the 1990’s in Australia but doctors are not being educated on the epidemiology of infectious diseases. That is, the importance of environmental and lifestyle characteristics in the control of infectious diseases. They are only educated on the necessity to use every vaccine that is recommended by the government.

Doctors are also not educated on the serious side-effects that have been associated with vaccines for decades or the contraindications of vaccines that were used prior to the introduction of the US Vaccine Injury Compensation Act in 1986 that removed all liability for harm from the vaccine manufacturers.

So why is there such a disparity between the medical literature on infectious diseases presented by independent researchers to that provided by medical practitioners and the government?

This is because the pharmaceutical companies are influencing every aspect of the development, marketing and promotion of vaccines to medical doctors and politicians (Stamatakis 2013). Doctors are not providing objective evidence on the control of infectious diseases and they are incorrectly stating that the public must get their advice on infectious diseases from doctors.

My university research has been completed in the field of Social Medicine at the University of Wollongong and powerful lobby groups have spread false and misleading information about my PhD research in the mainstream media and on social media in an attempt to remove its credibility from public debate.

My PhD thesis provides evidence that current government vaccination programs are resulting in more harm than good to children’s health and to the fabric of Australian society. Children’s health has significantly declined as the vaccination program has expanded since the 1990’s and thousands of parents are now long-term carers for children who will never reach their potential in life. 

Further, the Australian government is falsely claiming there is a consensus on the science of vaccination by creating an ‘appearance of a consensus’ through the criteria for medical registration. The Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act states that health professionals cannot promote “anti-vaccination material” or they will be de-registered from the profession – this is a label (anti-vaccination) that is being used to dismiss the risks of vaccines that have been associated with vaccines for decades.

This has removed the autonomy for doctors/health professionals in Australia to assess the full body of medical literature which means they are no longer serving the best interests of their patients but the best interests of the state  – the government. This is a breach of the medical code of conduct by Australian doctors who are not presenting the ingredients of vaccines or the serious risks of vaccines to their patients for a fully informed choice in using this medical procedure.

In order for Australians to protect their health, it is necessary to do your own research and to challenge your doctor with the medical literature that they are not providing on the control of infectious diseases or the ingredients and serious risks of vaccines.

Judy Wilyman PhD
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong
Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong.
PhD in The Science and Politics of the Australian Government’s Vaccination Program, UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry. 

Some of the Ingredients in Vaccines:

Did you know that antibiotics are in most vaccines? Many people are allergic to antibiotics and using any vaccine carries the serious risk of anaphylactic shock to this and many other vaccine ingredients. Are you being informed of this before you give consent to giving your newborn baby a vaccine?

Please consider whether you want these substances injected into the tissues of your newborn infant before the blood-brain barrier is developed at 6 months of age or their other body systems. These ingredients and more are present in vaccines and the vaccination schedule has expanded to 16 vaccines requiring 52 doses from birth to adolescence.

And the ‘new norm‘ – allergies, anaphylaxis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), autoimmune disorders (diabetes, childhood rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, multiple sclerosis etc.), thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), autism, speech delay, neurological disorders, encephalopathy, meningitis, ADHD, childhood cancers, and many more…..

But your doctor will inform you that this is ‘just a coincidence‘ because the MBA and the Australian government have never funded a causality study that would disprove this association. That is, a study that uses an inert placebo in the unvaccinated trial group to prove the safety of each vaccine over an appropriate time period that includes the delay in the appearance of these diseases – or the safety of the combination of vaccines on the government schedule:

Aluminium hydroxide
Aluminium hydroxide/phosphate
Aluminium phosphate
Borax (‘sodium borate’ – causes infertility and is found in HPV vaccines and hep A)
Polysorbate 80

Egg protein
Formaldehyde
Gelatin
Phenol
Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
Phenoxyethanol 
Thimerosal (50% mercury compound) (flu vaccine multidose vials and infanrix-hexa and hep B 2013)
Yeast 
Antibiotics: Neomycin, Polymxin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin

Source: https://mailchi.mp/893c20fafa24/newsletter-210-the-fallacy-of-doctors-being-experts-in-infectious-disease-control?e=fec8337d3c

4 thoughts on “The Fallacy of Doctors being ‘Experts’ in Infectious Disease Control

  1. FALLACY OF DOCTORS KNOWING ANYTHING
    OTHER THAN TO CAREFULLY LINE THEIR OWN POCKETS

    Woe, woe, woe, woe, is me
    my life such a tragedy
    Woe, woe, woe, woe, is me
    such is my sad history
    I booked a long-con with my GP afore that he should fill in & book a NEPT
    for poor blind & disabled me
    And he sat & looked at us both
    my daughter & me
    With the innocence of a newly born babe
    he swore he knew not that what we was talking about
    “did you bring the form,” he asked & let me see
    No, no, it is online & do have a look
    With confusion he glanced at his computer screen & pleaded
    “I have never done one before & I know not how, I know not how, na, na, na,”
    Toni now, “why don’t you try & bring it up online & have a go,”
    “but I do not know how, no, no ,no, I have never done it before
    Toni again, “if you’ve never done it before maybe now is your time to try & learn how,”
    🙂 Toni is my long lost daughter, now come found – hey !! 😉

  2. Tuesday 7.am I will front for my surgery & they can put me out into the street for the night – like that I will be there early Wednesday to have the eye patch taken off.

  3. If only I could sing 🙂
    I have a pink hat I purchased from the anti cancer people 😀
    The Fitzroy Gardens are just across the road 😉
    I could spend the night quite well – really 😛
    Edith Piaf – Mon Manege A Moi – Youtube 🙂
    If only I could sing – hey !!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *