Winston Churchill : Zionism Verses Bolshevism 1920

Winston Churchill : Zionism verses Bolshevism 1920

READ MORE AT THE BRIDGE 

Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, whom according to Greg Hallet, is the illegitimate child of Edward VII,[1] was an ardent Zionist with the role of berating Bolshevism to form the fantasy of division within the Jewish Messianic cult so they could offer up their speciality of opposing sides they control allowing a theology for the Bolshevik, Karl Marx and his action, and the theology for the political division in which God said subversion and ordered his faithful to birth Zionism.

Churchill was tasked, on behalf of the Crown to secure of the British Government that it make good on its deal to recognise and support the theft of Palestine for the House Rothschild.

Not forgetting this entire script is the newly formed mandate for Freemasonry after Edward VII had Lord Kitchener change it from the upkeep of the realm and Church of England to the coming fake Jerusalem to be installed on the land of another.

What we have in this script is a clear attack upon England by the Talmud which exposes the division between the nation and her military[2] and the Zionised aristocracy Churchill represented.

He presents Adam Weishaupt as the start of Zionism.

Zionism Versus Bolshevism (1920)

by Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill
Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920, pg. 5

ZIONISM versus BOLSHEVISM.
A STRUGGLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE.
By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.

SOME people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.” Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli’s confident assertion.

Good and Bad Jews.
The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified. We owe to the Jews in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together. On that system and by that faith there has been built out of the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilisation.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.

“National” Jews.
There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognisable share in the qualities which make up the national character. There are all sorts of men — good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent — in every country, and in every race. Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct. In a people of peculiar genius like the Jews, contrasts are more vivid, the extremes are more widely separated, the resulting consequences are more decisive.

At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jews, two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity, and the third absolutely destructive.

First there are the Jews who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life, and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jew living in England would say, “I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith.” This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the “National Jews” in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.

The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and useful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.

International Jews.
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Terrorist Jews.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

“Protector of the Jews.”
Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin’s authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, in relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms.

The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated. This is an injustice on millions of helpless people, most of whom are themselves sufferers from the revolutionary regime. It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations. And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time.

A Home for the Jews.
Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. It has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and a centre of national life. The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project, backed by many of the most prominent British Jews, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.

Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.

Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.

Duty of Loyal Jews.
It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race.

But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.

Notes
[1] How And Why British Freemasonry Changed Allowing The Mafia Monarchy To Reign Over Us
[2] Britain’s military was not of the same mind as its aristocracy in the creation of Israel :
1920-Col. Waters-Taylor, British Field-marshal Allenby’s Chief of Staff, met with Palestinian leader Haj Amin al-Husseinu a few weeks before Easter. He told Al-Husseini “he had a great opportunity at Easter to show the world…that Zionism was unpopular not only with the Palestine Administration but in Whitehall and if disturbances of sufficient violence occurred in Jerusalem at Easter, both General Bols [Chief Administrator in Palestine, 1919-20] and General Allenby [Commander of Egyptian Force, 1917-19, then High Commissioner of Egypt] would advocate the abandonment of the Jewish Home.”

1921-Britain reneges on the San Remo deal and gives converts three quarters of Mandatory Palestine to the Arab emirate of Transjordan. Transjordan was then to remain under auspices of the British.

1921-Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen, former head of British military intelligence in Cairo, and later Chief Political Officer for Palestine and Syria, wrote in his diary that British officials “incline towards the exclusion of Zionism in Palestine.”

1922-Britain is ordered to take the Mandate for Palestine by the League of Nations, until such time as the inhabitants of the land are able to stand alone. The awarding of the land was always on the condition they create a Jewish State. The “Jewish National Home” is not created, instead some Jews are granted permission to apply for citizenship of Mandatory Palestine.

1920s-Germany began to fear the Bolsheviks at the border after the horrors of genocide in Russia by there Jews was an open secret. Germany began to look for a strong leader to prevent the Bolsheviks expanding the revolution into Germany.

1937-The British Foreign Secretary, Anthony Eden ferociously campaigns to block Jewish sovereignty, on 26 November 1937 he told the British Ambassador in Washington he was looking for a solution “which would not give Jews any territory exclusively for their use.”

1938-The British government declares that its proposal (in the Peel and Woodhead Commission) to divide Mandatory Palestine into two states is untenable.

1939-While unfettered Arab immigration swells, made possible by Britain’s unrestricted immigration policy for Arabs to Mandatory Palestine. Britain issue the White Paper, a policy paper which severely restricted Jewish immigration to Palestine. At the time this paper was issued Jews were being subject to Nazi persecution in Europe.

1941-Theodore Kaufman released a book titled, ‘Germany Must Perish‘, in which he advocates the total annihilation of the German race. From this script would be birthed the need for the camp deaths to have been a state sponsored agenda. The evidence presents a reality opposite to that claim.

1946-Britain puts the entire city of Tel Aviv, 200,00 Jewish residents, under house arrest.
1946 – British antisemitism is rife. The then British Palestine Commander, Lt. General Evelyn Barker, issued an order banning British troops from socialising with Jews. He went on to say, “[We] will be punishing the Jews in a way the race dislikes as much as any, by striking at their pockets and showing our contempt of them”.1 In a letter to a lover he wrote “Yes I loathe the lot — whether they be Zionists or not. Why should we be afraid of saying we hate them? Its time this damned race knew what we think of them — loathsome people.” This came on the back of the murder and torture of British soldiers by the Jewish terror groups, they also slaughtered many Jews to gain global sympathy that they still ride today after slaughtering Arabs and Christians in the Middle East. The Sergeants affair and A poisonous legacy.
1947-The British government requests France and Italy prevent Jews from embarking for Palestine.
1947-The British ask the American government to ban fundraising for Israel, the Truman administration capitulates.

1947-In a United Nations vote on the partition of Mandatory Palestine, 72% voted for the creation of Jewish and Arab states. Britain was one of two Western nations that refused to vote.

1948/9-After Israel had been established. Britain again refused to vote in favour of admitting Israel to the United Nations (on both occasions Israel sought admission). It should be noted that not all Britons were against the Zionist ideal. People like Orde Wingate, Winston Churchill, Lord Balfour, Herbert Samuel and many other pro-Zionist individuals contributed to laying the foundations that Jewish Statehood was later built upon. This British support was short lived.

1948-David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognised the new nation on the same day.
And so one journey ended in order hell would open its anus and begin the long shite upon the world as a thank you for helping those cursed in the Torah steal the land of another. The world is guilty for all that came forth from the hive mind that is Zion.

Documents
Churchill to Baruch
Baruch Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt transmissions

Further Study
Churchill the Illegitimate Child of Edward VII
Charles Dreyfus, Winston Churchill And A Letter To Nathan Laski
Second Balfour Declaration
Do You Know The Aims Of Theresa May And Her Government?

Source: https://thebridgelifeinthemix.info/history/churchill-zionism-verses-bolshevism-1920/

8 thoughts on “Winston Churchill : Zionism Verses Bolshevism 1920

  1. For the poor drunk lush that he was.
    In the movie of Thatcher – never once did they show her in her most favorite position – drunk on the kitchen floor.

  2. “One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.” – Winston Churchill

  3. A few days ago I watched 4hrs on how Solomon created the DEMONS & had a magic ring which controlled them – through Freemasonry right up to today.
    I read The Hobbit, The Lord Of The Rings, The Haunting of Cassie Palmer …. enough already.
    I’m over fairy stories & haunting.
    That the world is still hanging on to, fantasy in today’s world tells me that we are a failed mutation – doomed.

  4. “If ever Great Britian was plunged into a disaster comparable to the one that afflicted Germany in 1918 I would ask God that he should send us a man with the strength and the character of your Excellency” – Winston Churchill

  5. Fairy stories? You decide
    The confession of General Cornwallis (left) to General Washington at Yorktown (Oct. 17, 1781)
    Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem a contradiction:
    “Your churches will be used to teach the Jew’s religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry.”

  6. History tells us that when the Venetian Oligarchy was defeated in the War of the League of Cambria this rich Jewish Oligarchy chose England as their new base of financial control.
    Hense we saw the colonisation of many Nations for the purpose of wealth aggrandisement by this group.
    The British Commonwealth was born in rape and pillage and remains that today.
    The Boer War was the spark that fired the Rhodes/Milner idealism that constructed the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Round Table Council of Foreign Relations that, today, effects us all.
    These groups were formed to promote world control by the British Empire.
    Put simply, the so called New World Order is of Jewish design and is enacted to feed their psychopaths belief that some God gave them the power over planet earth.
    I just cannot stomach this crap that a so called God gave this mob of Jews control of this world.

    “The currently ending 500-year cycle in European history, which came to the surface during the Fifteenth century, has been determined by the emerging conflict between the two leading forces within European culture during that century. On the one side, there were the forces of the Golden Renaissance, centered around such figures as Cardinal Nicolaus of Cusa and the 1439-40 Council of Florence. On the opposing side, was the re-emerging power of the Venice-centered European aristocratic and financier oligarchy. … All European history since the Fifteenth century within Europe and globally, has been dominated by the cultural conflict between the radiated influence of the Renaissance and the opposing, Venice-launched force of the so-called ‘Enlightenment.’
    —Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
    ‘The coming Fall of the House of Windsor’

  7. Should we read \”The Controversy of Zion\” by Douglass Read we would find that Zionism and Communism were parallel ideals born in the Jewish ghetto\’s of Russia.
    The Jews were the controlling power in the genocidal Russian Revolution that, according to scholars, some 60 million perished. Sort of makes the Nazi Holocaust insignificant.
    Yet, in our schools today, all we hear about is the Holocaust and not the Jew orchestrated Russian Revolution. I would ask Why?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *