Youtube Livestream “Fails” to Process Powerful Interview With Aussie Vax Truth Teller Meryl Dorey

No-Meryl-Interview

Dr Rima’s Truth Reports Show censored Again? 

How Come Youtube’s Livestream System, Which Has Worked Perfectly Before, “Failed” to Process Australian Vaccine Truth Teller Meryl Dorey’s Interview on the Dr. Rima Truth Reports? Because Google REALLY Doesn’t Want You to Have Her Information?

By Rima E. Laibow, MD

Meryl Dorey is no stranger to opposition.  As a leading voice of vaccine truth in Australia, a nation with a No Jab, No Pay law depriving parents of about $16,000 US per year per child if they do not vaccinate their children, regardless of religious or other objections they may have to those vaccinations, Meryl has seen her share of attacks, opposition and chicanery.

In fact, there were Australian trolls present on that chat yesterday, March 30, 2016, when Meryl appeared as the guest on the Dr. Rima Truth Reports, broadcast via live stream every Wednesday from 6-8 PM Eastern with access through www.HealthFreedomPortal.org.

My Co Host, Counsel Ralph Fucetola, JD, and I spent two passionate hours with Meryl learning about the assault not only by the pro-vax religionists (aka Australian Skeptics and others) but also how, for the first and only time known, the Australian (or any) government forced a private organization to change its name because the government did not like the name, not because it was pornographic, in other use, or for other legitimate reasons.

Her organization was forced to change its name from “Australian Vaccine Network” to “Australian Vaccine Skeptic’s Network”.

Meryl also explained that the process at law in Australia requires that an organization secure the opinion of a barrister that there is a reasonable expectation of winning a law suit if the organization’s officers wish to avoid the possibility of personal and financial liability should they not prevail in the case and that they had now secured the written opinion of a barrister stating that their case in the High Court against the No Jab, No Pay law had merit.

Counsel Ralph and I discussed the application and importance of International Law which guarantees every person in a country which has ratified the Geneva Convention (which includes Australia, the US, Canada, New Zealand and 122 other nations around the world) the absolute right of Informed Consent.

That right must be properly asserted, however.  Learn more here: http://TinyURL.com/AVDCard

youtube-censored-2This is toxic information for a suppressive surveillance government (or two) and we must wonder if the unique failure to process this data is another form of censorship like those that the Australian Vaccine Skeptic’s Network and the Natural Solutions Foundation experience so often.

The stronger the oppositional force that we present to those who would compel us to accept vaccines against our will, the more likely this censorship is.  The Foundation has been the target of Operation Choke Point, GoFundMe.com shut us down because we were running a campaign to raise the funds to take the FDA to Federal Court to force them to support Informed Consent and Natural Solutions Foundation’s websites are constantly hacked.

To support Natural Solutions Foundation, go to our tax exempt sister organization, Institute for Health Research, www.InHeRe.org and donate generously.  We can have huge impact, but only if you join us in supporting our Acton Items to pound lawmakers and other decision-makers and support our efforts.

100% of your donations go directly to support our programs and work and we depend totally on your generosity so those donations are urgently needed and gratefully received.

Refuse vaccine mandates. Go to http://TinyURL.com/VaccinationISViolation  Your voice counts.  Share the link with others so their voice can count, too.

Like and Share the Foundation\s Facebook page, NaturalSolutionsFoundation

http://www.opensourcetruth.com/2016/03/31/youtube-livestream-fails-to-process-powerful-interview-with-aussie-vax-truth-teller-meryl-dorey/

http://drrimatruthreports.com/

http://drrimatruthreports.com/advancevaccinedirective/

 

3 thoughts on “Youtube Livestream “Fails” to Process Powerful Interview With Aussie Vax Truth Teller Meryl Dorey

  1. “to secure the opinion of a barrister”… – and therefore – … THE BARRISTER NEEDS TO BE VERY CAREFUL HERE – … “that there is a reasonable expectation of winning a law suit” –

    WHAT DOES THIS MEAN …/?

    This is very serious … what we are expecting of the barrister here – is that he/she is able – with in reason – to judge & conclude that a case is able to be made – that a wrong has been done –

    JUST THIS ONE, LOWLY, & ALL ON THEIR OWNSOME BARRISTER IS GIVEN THE RESPONSIBILITY – THE POWER – TO JUDGE IF WRONG HAS BEEN DONE –

    Now just wait a moment here – what are you trying to tell me –
    Then I need to ask you this –
    THEN – WHAT IS THE POINT OF GOING TO COURT … ??????????????
    IF A COMMON & ORDINARY BARRISTER IS THE JUDGE OF WHAT HAS BEEN DONE WRONGLY ENOUGH TO WARRENT SEEKING LEGAL REDRESS.

    Okay :- then let me put it this way –
    I have been advised – by a barrister – that – to seek legal redress was not prudent, and may even be frivolous, & / or not beneficial in my case.
    AND YET
    I have looked up the legal cases & discovered a MORE FLIMSY case that WAS WON.
    I can now SUE the knowledgable barrrister for mis-informing me AND ONLY TO MY DETRIMENT & to the perversion, by the said barrister, of my seeking justice – the barrister has perverted the course of justice – AND IS LIABLE = kaching, kaching, kaching. “see you in court sucker”
    Why are we intimidaded by these no account – selfserving shysters STILL ?

  2. The title Australian Vaccination Network – is misleading
    The title Australian Vaccination Skeptic’s Nework – is also mis-leading
    Australian Vaccination Information Network – would be a better title – and if there is foundation / clear information / data – that can show REASONABLE DOUBT – because that is all you need to prove – to a jury – in a court of law – to obtain a NOT GUILTY VERDICT
    And therefore it/the same expectation – MUST be accepted in mainstream –
    The word SKEPTIC – cannot apply in a case of reasonable doubt –
    meaning –
    Reasonable doubt – is not mere possible doubt. “it is that state of the case which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence leaves the minds of the jurors in that condition that they cannot say that they feel an abiding conviction to a moral certainty of the truth of the charges”
    If there is a reasonable doubt – as to the safety & effectiveness of a vaccine – then the safety of that vaccine must be considered & reconsidered.

    Do you have any idea how many UNEMPLOYED LEGAL MINDS are out there in mainstream Australia, who would love to do a bit of legal work in the right direction ?
    What a waste of Australian talent

  3. special request –
    “the shelf fell off the door of the fridge,I don’t know how it happened’ said my adult daughter, in passing, this morning.
    the bits that hold it in place have broken off – can I glue it back on rather than buy another shelf – glue right across the door to make sure it stays on ?
    April fools Day is to me what Friday 13th is to others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *