Crazz Files

Exposing the Dark Truth of Our World

CNN Touts Dan Savage Study: ‘Cuckolding Can Be Positive for Some Couples’

CNN has claimed cuckoldry “can be positive for some couples,” citing a recent study by Dan Savage.

“In our current political climate, the term ‘cuck’ — short for ‘cuckservative’ — has become an insult of the so-called alt-right, aimed at men they view as spineless and emasculated. The slur has its roots in the concept of cuckolding, or having an adulterous partner,” claimed CNN in their article, demonstrating a tenuous grasp on popular usage of the term. “But, according to a recent study by David Ley, Justin Lehmiller and the writer Dan Savage, acting on cuckolding fantasies can be a largely positive experience for many couples, and hardly a sign of weakness.”

“Cuckolding has become fetishized into a powerful sexual fantasy for some men, who get aroused by the idea of their romantic partner engaging in sexual activity with someone else. Women also share this fantasy, but less so than men,” they explained. “Remember that sometimes just sharing a sexy thought can be arousing enough — you don’t have to follow through. If you are thinking about acting on a cuckolding fantasy, it’s worth stepping back first and making sure your relationship is in a good place and that you have strong sexual communication skills… For couples who do decide to move forward, it’s important to take things slow.”

CNN based their statements on a study co-produced by sex writer Dan Savage, which revealed 58 percent of American men and “about a third of women had fantasized about cuckolding.”

In 2000, Savage also licked the doorknobs in politician Gary Bauer’s campaign office in an attempt to make the Republican ill.

Charlie Nash covers technology and LGBT for Breitbart News. You can follow him on Twitter @MrNashington, or like his page at Facebook.


‘Gay’ journalist group backed by Fox News gives award to vicious homosexual activist

1 thought on “CNN Touts Dan Savage Study: ‘Cuckolding Can Be Positive for Some Couples’

  1. Imagine you are driving your car on the highway.
    There is a lowest speed of 60 mph set on your speedometer – your car cannot go any slower.
    Also imagine that the highest speed your car can go is not much faster than the lowest set speed – pus the accelerator peddle as far down as you like.

    This is what my pacemaker is doing to me.
    My pacemaker is set at 60 Resting Beats Per Minute.
    If I walk 5-6 meters – that is from my bed room into the next room – I am exhausted, breathless, my chest feels like it is clamped in a vice – if I don’t sit down I it gets worse & can cause chest pains – which can lead to a “Nuisance Triple 000 Crying Wolf” call – it can also be the beginning of a heart attack & my death.

    I was told nothing about this pacemaker & it now over 6 month after the fact.
    I have told everyone I can think of at the hospital & I get the same response “She is imagining it, but lets indulge her ever so slightly by standing in silence until she shuts up.” Which tells me that they know.

    I need to contact the manufacturer & the distributor of this pacemaker & talk to them.

    A pacemaker is set at 60 RHPM which is the lowest it is allowed to go – to 130 RHPM which is the highest it is allowed to go.
    When you reach the Upper Tracking Limit of 130 RHBP the pacemaker starts skipping heart beats.
    In some cases it will suddenly cause your heart rate to drop by 1/2 – which would drop your heart rate to 60-70 RHBM – which is not very pleasant & also very scary.

    My pacemaker lowest speed is set at 60 RHPM & the highest must be stuck on 70 RHBM or there abouts.
    I cannot begin to imagine what kind of damage this is doing to my heart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © Crazz Files | Newsphere by AF themes.