Could the COVID vaccine be canceled before the first injection?
Follow-up: the astounding failure of all three COVID vaccine clinical trials
September 29, 2020
(To join our email list, click here.)
I covered this breaking story last week.
I analyzed a startling piece in the NY Times that torpedoed the major clinical trials now underway, headed up by Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.
My readers, who know the devil is in the details, saw how absurd these trials are.
Now I want to go back and fill in a few new facts that round out the picture.
As a result of increased scrutiny and pressure, the vaccine companies couldn’t just say their experimental COVID vaccine produced antibodies, meaning there was a “proper immune response” to the vaccine. That wouldn’t be enough to win FDA approval.
No, they would have to create two huge groups of human volunteers, give one group the vaccine, and the other group a saltwater placebo shot.
Then what?
Then wait. Since these companies believe the coronavirus is everywhere, descending from the clouds and infecting millions of people, they would wait for some volunteers to “catch COVID-19.”
How many volunteers? 150. That’s the magic number.
At that point, the clinical trial would stop. Everything would stop.
The big reveal would take place. Of these 150 cases of COVID-19, how many occurred in volunteers who got the vaccine, and how many COVID-19 cases occurred in the volunteers who got the placebo saltwater shot?
Get it? In other words, this information would show how successful the vaccine was in protecting the volunteers from COVID-19.
What would the vaccine companies be hoping and praying for? A breakdown like this: only 50 COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group, and 100 cases in the placebo group.
Why? Because this would prove the vaccine was 50% effective in preventing COVID-19. And that percentage is all the FDA requires to issue an authorization for the vaccine—an authorization to shoot up all Americans.
Absurd. Preposterous. 150 volunteers determine whether 350 million Americans will be targeted for a vaccine. But that’s not the bottom line in this story.
Let’s return to the beginning again. The vaccine companies, forced to enroll tens of thousands of live humans in their clinical trials, need to decide: who will these volunteers be?
Will they be the elderly, most of whom are already ill with prior conditions, their immune systems already very weak—who could—as even public health agencies warn—keel over from any vaccine injection? Of course not.
The volunteers will have to be healthy adults. Yes. But that presents a huge and fateful problem.
Remember, these volunteers, after they receive either the vaccine or the placebo, will be sent back to live their lives while everyone waits. Waits to see who “catches COVID-19.”
What sort of COVID-19 illness? Very mild? Quite serious?
The answer is obvious. It can’t be “quite serious.” That would mean pneumonia. The vaccine companies could wait around for 10 years and still not record 150 cases of real pneumonia among these HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS.
No, the vaccine companies would wait for 150 mild cases of COVID-19. Meaning, nothing more than a simple cough, or chills and fever, and a positive PCR test.
(In this article, I won’t describe the MANY problems with the worthless and deceptive PCR test.)
Can you see it yet? The vaccine companies are in a box. They’re trapped.
Their whole clinical trial is DESIGNED to prove the vaccine can protect against MILD CASES of COVID-19. That’s all.
AND NOBODY CARES ABOUT THAT. MILD CASES CURE THEMSELVES. NO VACCINE IS NECESSARY.
A SUCCESSFUL VACCINE SHOULD BE PROTECTING PEOPLE AGAINST THE SERIOUS AND LIFE-THREATENING COVID-19 CASES.
BUT THIS IS NOT WHAT THE CLINICAL TRIALS ARE DESIGNED TO PROVE.
Verdict: the three major ongoing clinical trials of a COVID vaccine are useless. Regardless of outcome, regardless of what kind of vaccine is being tested, the designed protocol for the clinical trials makes the trials irrelevant, useless, and pointless.
Will scientists and doctors and civilians wake up and flood the FDA with objections, and force the agency to reject these clinical trials and these vaccine companies?
Can we spread the truth about these clinical trials far and wide?
“Let’s wait and see what happens” isn’t good enough.
Not by a long shot.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
Source: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/29/could-covid-vaccine-be-canceled-before-first-injection/
That’s not even all – saline solution placebos are rarely if ever used in vaccines trials!
The self-proclaimed gold standard of the pharmaceutical industry is the double-blind, placebo-controlled study (a placebo being a neutral, ineffective substance; in the case of vaccinations, a saline solution).
Vaccines are drugs, and they are made by the pharmaceutical industry. But they are the exception to the rule, for the abovementioned gold standard is NOT applied to vaccines. There is no double-blind, placebo-controlled study that shows that vaccines are either safe or effective, let alone a study that shows the effects of multiple vaccines given, as is common practice, simultaneously.
Vaccine efficacy is fatally flawed as a substitute for vaccine effectiveness. A vaccine’s efficacy is measured by the proportion of vaccinees developing a certain concentration of antibodies, a concentration believed to be protective. But scientists have already known for three decades that antibodies do NOT equal immunity. The only way to measure vaccine efficacy in a lab is completely useless for measuring its effectiveness in an epidemic. But that too seems to bother nobody; in lieu of its effectiveness at protection, the drug’s efficacy in antibody production is still used universally to sell it.
Those who try to impose their beliefs on others, we call zealots.
The reason people don’t care about these facts is that they have such a strong BELIEF in these shots that it doesn’t seem to matter whether there is any evidence of safety or efficacy. But anyone can believe anything; that doesn’t mean it’s true. And it doesn’t matter either that most doctors believe in it and that many people believe their doctors. There are some 1.5 billion people who believe in Jesus, some 800 million who believe in Allah, some 800 million who believe in Shiva. That’s considerably more than the number of doctors who believe in vaccinations. Still everyone agrees that these are religions and not science. So ‘everyone believes it’ doesn’t make a belief anything more than a belief.
http://nocompulsoryvaccination.com/2015/02/05/why-vaccinations-are-a-religion/
The World Health Organization’s “Expert Consultation on the Use of Placebos in Vaccine Trials” (2013)
“Trials of vaccines against diseases for which there are no existing vaccines raise few special ethical issues in relation to the use of placebos.
However, it remains unclear under which circumstances, if any, a placebo-controlled clinical trial design is ethically justifiable when an efficacious or partially efficacious vaccine already exists.”
Research ethics committees, drug regulators and policy-makers “recommend that placebos should not be used as a comparator when an effective intervention already exists.”
“… some national guidelines strictly rule out the use of placebos in all cases where an established effective intervention exists.”
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/94056/1/9789241506250_eng.pdf