Developer of Gardasil says this HPV vaccine leads to NO BENEFIT only harm from permanent injuries


HPV is NOT an infectious, communicable disease. Cervical cancer is NOT a public health threat. WHY are there HPV mandates for school children? This vaccine was NEVER tested on anyone under the age of 25 and they are recommending (and MANDATING) this vaccine for children as young as nine. Could these mandates stem from the fact that the CDC holds patents and they financial profit from this most damaging and yet lucrative vaccine?

The HPV vaccine was NEVER developed to prevent cancer, it was developed and approved to prevent WARTS. Warts are not a public health threat. And yet, parents are being marketed to that their daughters get the three shots and they will be protected from cervical cancer. It has been scientifically shown that HPV when treated early does not develop into cancer. Now parents will have a false sense of security and their daughters won’t get paps smears, there will be no early detection.

This vaccine is devastating. 61,552 cases of vaccine injury from the HPV vaccine. That’s more than the total number of cervical cancer in the United States in any given year.

Medical consumers – do not consent to the administration of Gardasil 9 unless you and your medical provider have read and discussed the entire package insert together. The choice is yours, make it an informed one. Norma Erickson examined the Gardasil 9 package insert where she found that the rate of serious adverse events in the trials of Gardasil 9 was 2.3-2.5%. This means that for every 100,000 people who are given Gardasil 9, there will be 2,300 serious adverse events, and yet the cervical cancer rate in the U.S. is around 7 women per 100,000.

What health official in their right mind is willing to anticipate 2,300 serious adverse events to try and prevent 7.9 cases of cervical cancer?

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting

Approval of Gardasil 9 which contains double the amount of neurotoxic aluminium!

Aluminum is a known neurotoxin. A quick search of PubMed for ’aluminum toxicity human’ returns no less than 2132 peer-reviewed and published scientific papers on the subject. Learn more:

Ask your Doctor: 

  • Why did Merck more than double the amount of aluminum adjuvant in Gardasil 9?
  • What long-term health consequences are associated with the injection of 1,500 mcg of aluminum over a period of less than a year via 3 doses of Gardasil 9?
  • If 2.5% of women reacted to the vaccine in the trials. How will I know if my child will be one who has a serious reaction?
  • What studies who that HPV reduces cancer and/or death from cervical cancer? 
  • Why did they reduce the recommended age of use to 9 when the trials were done on women over 23? 

Increased Vaccinations has not Decreased Death Rates from HPV

HPV vaccination rates are increasing, as more children are up to date on HPV vaccination. In 2017, roughly half (49 percent) of adolescents were up to date on the HPV vaccine, and 66 percent of adolescents ages 13-17 years received the first dose to start the vaccine series. On average, the percentage of adolescents who started the HPV vaccine series increased by 5 percentage points each year over the past five years (2013-2017). – CDC

If it was the “cancer preventative” vaccine they tout, wouldn’t those numbers be going way down?  CDC’s own figures show an INCREASE in death due to cervical cancer.


Bombshell #1 Serious Adverse Events

According to the FDA a serious adverse event must fit one of the following criteria: death, life-threatening, hospitalization, disability or permanent damage, congenital abnormality/birth defect, or the requirement to intervene to prevent permanent impairment.

According to the Gardasil 9 package insert, the following percentage of serious adverse events were collected during follow-up (up to 48 months):


Number receiving shot Type of vaccine Percentage Serious AE’s Number of Serious AE’s
13,236 Gardasil 9 2.3% 305
7,378 Gardasil 2.5% 185


For the first time, Merck has disclosed what may indeed be close to the true rate of serious adverse events people are suffering after the use of Gardasil and will probably continue to suffer if they consent to use Gardasil 9.  The only difference would be that the rates may be higher when used in the general population because certain at-risk groups are excluded from clinical trial participation but not from vaccination programs.

2.3-2.5% doesn’t sound that bad until you compare apples to apples. Cervical cancer rates are always quoted as # per 100,000. Given the above information, for every 100,000 people using Gardasil 9 there would be 2,300 serious adverse events. The cervical cancer diagnosis rate in the United States is 7.9/100,000.

What health official in their right mind is willing to anticipate 2,300 serious adverse events to try and prevent 7.9 cases of cervical cancer?

Keep in mind that the cost of vaccinating 100,000 people is around $30 million ($100 per injection, 3 injections). This doesn’t even begin to address the cost of treating 2,300 serious adverse events, the emotional, physical and financial expense to families and the cost to society via the lost productivity of the injured.

Bombshell #2 Systemic Autoimmune Disorders

An autoimmune disorder occurs when the body’s immune system attacks and destroys healthy body tissue by mistake. There are more than 80 types of autoimmune disorders. Many of the people diagnosed as suffering systemic autoimmune disorders after HPV vaccines were first mis-diagnosed with conversion disorder or psychosomatic illnesses. Below are the rates of “new medical conditions potentially indicative of autoimmune disorders” experienced during Merck’s Gardasil 9 clinical trials.


Number receiving shot Type of vaccine Autoimmune Disorders Number
13,234 Gardasil 9 2.4% 321
7,378 Gardasil 3.3% 240

So, in addition to the serious adverse events, you now have an additional 2,400 people who may be left with systemic autoimmune disorders. How can any health official possibly think Gardasil 9 is worth this kind of risk?

Bombshell #3 Pregnancy Outcomes

According to the Gardasil 9 package insert, 1,028 women who were injected with Gardasil 9 became pregnant during the course of the clinical trials along with 991 women who had been injected with Gardasil. Overall, 14.1% of the Gardasil 9 women suffered adverse outcomes while 17.0% of the Gardasil women suffered the same fate.

There is no distance I would not travel or measure I would not take if I thought it could save someone from giving this shot to their child. Not only does it not prevent cancer, it causes cervical cancer. It also causes premature ovarian failure and it destroys fertility. This vaccine killed 40 people in the original clinical trial. According to the Gardasil 9 package insert, 1,028 women who were injected with Gardasil 9 became pregnant during the course of the clinical trials. A total of 313 women either lost their babies to spontaneous abortion or late fetal death or gave birth to children with congenital anomalies. @ Chris Kirckof

This population was further broken down into those who became pregnant within 30 days of an injection and those who became pregnant more than 30 days post-injection. The charts are below.


Number of pregnancies Type of vaccine % abortion/stillborn Lost Babies
62 Gardasil 9 27.4% 17
55 Gardasil 12.7% 7


Number of pregnancies Type of vaccine % abortion/stillborn Lost Babies
960 Gardasil 9 10.9% 105
933 Gardasil 14.6% 136


Note: The numbers from these two charts do not add up to the total number Merck stated in the first paragraph. That is because in the ’more than 30 days’ group there were also 20 cases of congenital anomalies after Gardasil 9 and 21 cases after Gardasil.

Merck stated in the package insert, ”The proportions of adverse outcomes observed were consistent with pregnancy outcomes observed in the general population.”

Unless they are talking about some country other than the United States, THIS IS NOT TRUE.

According to the CDC’s latest publication on fetal mortality, the rate of spontaneous abortions and fetal deaths in the United States is 6.05/1,000 pregnancies or 0.605% – hardly 10.9%, much less 27.4%, and certainly not ’consistent with outcomes observed in the general population’ of the United States.

Do CBER officials not even go to the trouble of verifying the ’facts’ presented by vaccine manufacturers when they are ’evaluating data concerning the safety, effectiveness, and appropriate use’ of vaccines?

Whether these actions, or lack of proper actions are a result of malfeasance, laziness, or just plain stupidity does not matter at this point. It is obvious to the most casual observer the FDA either cannot or will not properly handle their responsibility to protect and preserve the public’s health and safety. They have violated the public trust.

Developer of the vaccine Diane Harper one of the lead researchers for the Merck drug is speaking out about its risks, benefits and aggressive marketing. She helped to get the vaccine approved, and saw first hand the devastation it causes.

There is absolutely no excuse for exposing young women and men to this level of risk for a vaccine that provides nothing other than promises of results far down the road.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *