Failure to obtain informed consent for Covid jabs – what is the indemnity insurance position of health practitioners?
Please see below my email to health practitioners’ indemnity insurance provider Avant, querying the position of practitioners who don’t obtain ‘voluntary informed consent’ before the Covid-19 jabs
Has anyone truly given ‘voluntary informed consent’ before these jabs – who has been properly informed about their individual risk re Covid-19 and the repeated shots of Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’?
How can someone who has been mandated to submit to the jabs give ‘voluntary informed consent’?
Why have doctors’ professional organisations such as the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and the Australian Medical Association not spoken out against the mandates? It’s astonishing and shocking that they’ve gone along with pressuring, coercing and manipulating people to submit to medical interventions which they have not been allowed to properly evaluate from a personal health perspective.
With presumably millions of Australians jabbed under mandates, including health practitioners, this is brewing as an explosive situation, as ‘voluntary informed consent’ has been trashed – what happens when people comprehend the significance of this medical assault on personal autonomy and bodily integrity?
Please see below my email to Avant.
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
For the attention of:
Georgie Haysom
Head of Advocacy Team
Avant – Professional Indemnity Insurance
Georgie Haysom, many people have been, and are being, mandated to have Covid-19 jabs in Australia, via State and Territory Government directions, and mandates instigated by employers/businesses, sports clubs, entertainment and hospitality venues, retail, etc.
The Covid-19 jabs are ‘leaky vaccines’ that do not prevent infection nor transmission, and purportedly provide ‘protection’ of very limited duration against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people.
Can you please clarify the indemnity insurance position of health practitioners who inject patients with Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’, knowing the patient is subject to a Covid jab mandate?
The Covid jab mandates conflict with the obligation for health practitioners to obtain ‘voluntary informed consent’ before a medical intervention, i.e. as described in The Australian Immunisation Handbook, under Valid consent, i.e.
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) has also confirmed to me in writing that practitioners have an obligation to obtain informed consent, i.e.
As a health professional you:
– require informed consent from a patient prior to providing them with a vaccination; and
– have a duty of care to ensure patients are making educated and informed decisions about
vaccination.
The Operation COVID Shield factsheet notes:
Presumably millions of people in Australia have now been injected with Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’ via State and Territory Government directions, and mandates instigated by employers/businesses, sports clubs, entertainment and hospitality venues, retail, etc.
As many people have been pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to the Covid-19 jabs via mandates, how can they have given ‘voluntary informed consent’ in accordance with The Australian Immunisation Handbook, the AHPRA confirmation letter dated 21 September 2021, and the Australian Government Operation COVID Shield factsheet?
George Haysom,
This is a most important matter of public interest, and I request your early response.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
