Has Australia’s vaccination policy been hijacked by the vaccine industry?

over-vaccination

Elizabeth Hart

Hi All, FYI, please see below my recent email to Professor Andrew Wilson, Chair of the PBAC, yet again raising serious matters about Australia’s coercive vaccination policy.

For the attention of:

Professor Andrew Wilson
Chair of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee

Dear Professor Wilson, both you and the PBAC secretariat have repeatedly failed to acknowledge and respond to my emails raising serious concerns about Australia’s taxpayer-funded coercive vaccination policy, a policy which I suggest is resulting in gross over-vaccination of the community with lucrative vaccine products, particularly over-vaccination of children.

Australian politicians across the political spectrum are also refusing to be accountable to citizens for taxpayer-funded coercive vaccination policy. This has been my personal experience, including with the Senate Committee responsible for inquiring and reporting re the No Jab, No Pay bill, a sham procedure which rubber- stamped the fast-tracking of the Australian Federal Government’s No Jab, No Pay law in January 2016.

Citizens are entitled to question whether Australia’s taxpayer-funded vaccination policy has been hijacked by the vaccine industry.

The vaccine industry appears to be directly controlling Australia’s taxpayer-funded vaccination policy,

including via the participation of academics involved with vaccine product clinical trials who are, or have been, members of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), and other groups influencing vaccination policy such as the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance. There is scant disclosure of conflicts of interest for many of these people, some of whom are also involved with the vaccine industry-funded Immunisation Coalition.

Professor Wilson, it is startling that the Murdoch media group, News Corp, has also influenced taxpayer- funded vaccination policy with its prolonged campaign for coercive vaccination, i.e. its No Jab, No Play media campaign, which was obligingly embraced by most politicians, and enacted as the coercive Federal No Jab, No Pay law and State No Jab, No Play laws. The Murdoch media group News Corp has a massive conflict of interest in that it is associated with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, an organisation which is involved in vaccine product development, including the GlaxoSmithKline Bexsero meningococcal B vaccine product.

The Murdoch / News Corp tabloids have fear-mongered about very rare invasive meningococcal B disease, and campaigned relentlessly for the highly questionable and lucrative GlaxoSmithKline Bexsero vaccine product to be added to the taxpayer-funded National Immunisation Program Schedule, as I have outlined in my previous emails directly to you (see hyperlinks below), including reference to Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s involvement in this matter.

Professor Wilson, there is a complete failure of transparency and accountability for Australia’s vaccination policy, including the failure of the ABC and SBS to provide critical analysis of taxpayer-funded coercive vaccination policy. Both of these taxpayer-funded broadcasters have acted as unquestioning promoters of vaccine products. Are journalists at the ABC and SBS collaborating with the coercive vaccination lobby groups SAVN and Friends of Science in Medicine?

Similarly, The Conversation website, which has received government and university funding, has been an avid promoter of vaccine products, and has censored citizens questioning vaccination policy, as I know from personal experience. I was banned from commenting on The Conversation by its Editor Misha Ketchell, who was previously involved with the ABC’s Media Watch, 7.30 and The Drum programs, plus The Age and Crikey. The Conversation censors citizens questioning taxpayer-funded coercive vaccination policy, while supporting members of the coercive vaccination lobby groups SAVN and Friends of Science in Medicine, publishing opinion pieces on vaccination by Patrick Stokes (SAVN), David Hawkes (SAVN and FSM) and Rachael Dunlop.

(SAVN and FSM). Patrick Stokes and Sue Ieraci (FSM) also have the privileged status of being ‘moderators’ on The Conversation, with the power to censor comments on articles relevant to vaccination policy and practice.

Professor Wilson, Australia’s taxpayer-funded coercive vaccination policy is a disaster, awash with conflicts of interest. The Australian community is being exploited via the over-use of lucrative vaccine products, particularly children. We have no idea of the long-term cumulative effects of this plethora of vaccine interventions throughout life, this is a massive experiment which is underway in the community, without ‘informed consent’.

The vast network protecting the international over-vaccination agenda is contemptuous of citizens who raise legitimate concerns about vaccination policy and practice, marginalising them with the disparaging ‘anti-vaxxer’ tag, and even seeking to censor public discussion. This is wrong Professor Wilson, citizens must be allowed to freely question vaccination policy and practice, there must be transparency and accountability for vaccination policy and practice in our liberal democracies.

Professor Wilson, I request you urgently acknowledge and respond to the very serious matters I have raised directly with you in this and previous emails, e.g.

Murdoch media’s continuing campaign for the GSK Bexsero meningococcal B vaccine product

(22 August 2019)

Challenging Murdoch influence on Australia’s coercive vaccination policy – the example of meningococcal B vaccination (13 August 2019)

Media blitz promoting meningococcal B vaccination for the taxpayer-funded schedule (22 July 2019)

Questionable claims for the safety of aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine products (17 April 2019) Please note this correspondence is being circulated to other parties, this is an important matter of

international public interest.

Sincerely

Elizabeth Hart

Independent citizen investigating conflicts of interest in vaccination policy and the over-use of vaccine products.

Elizabeth Hart <eliz.hart25@gmail.com>

3 thoughts on “Has Australia’s vaccination policy been hijacked by the vaccine industry?

  1. U know what has been buzzing around in my head ..
    Of late ..
    How easy it would be to HIDE
    CANCER .. CAUSING .. CELLS in a flu vaccine ..
    What’s the bet they have not
    And a long time ago
    MASTERED the TECHNIQUE of spreading cancer in vaccines ..
    If it is true .. someone must know .. someone always knows ..
    Ask about within the disgruntled BigPharma Industry
    Some top CEO/CFO who was given a pink slip at some time or other ..

  2. I would never take the so-called flu shot. OTOH, (I’m a Boomer) my mother made sure i got Polio, Whooping Cough etc; also Rubella in High school… and have had Hep B. Are the side-effects random? I wonder? Anyway, no regrets.

  3. Dear Elizabeth Hart,
    I admire your concern and effort to endeavour to seek truth from intellectuals who have sold their souls to the State.
    These pseudo intellectuals do have credentials but they lack spirit or soul and their lives are entwined with the luxuries that, by supporting State dogma, brings regardless of the toll inflicted to the people and children who suffer these State policies.
    The State needs support to continue on with its policy of control and confiscation so, apart from the support they get from profit dominated Corporations, the support of intellectual groups assist in the lies and deceit that they promote to enable their continued survival. The controlled report from an established professor in Biology has impact with the sad media we call mainstream.
    What we need is more intellectuals, such as you, to join forces and offer the scientific facts about the dangers of vaccination. It is achievable!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *