How the Criminal FDA Protects Big Pharma by Controlling the Media

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has released a video of whistleblower Brook Jackson, who was a regional director employed by Ventavia Research Group in Texas in 2020 to monitor the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials.

When she observed the data from the trials being handled improperly, she recommended they stop enrolling people in the trials. But her employer did not agree, so she reported them to the FDA.

She thought that the FDA would take action to correct this fraud, but instead, her employer fired her shortly after she contacted the FDA.

Brook Jackson learned the hard way that the FDA does not protect the public, but the pharmaceutical industry. Not only did the FDA not respond to her reporting, they did not even bother to investigate the site where the alleged infractions occurred.

So she took her story to the British Medical Journal (BMJ), who ended up publishing it because she backed up everything she was reporting with solid facts and information.

But when the article in the BMJ was shared on Facebook, the Facebook fact checkers marked it as fake news. See:

The British Medical Journal Story That Exposed Politicized “Fact-Checking”

This is a common tactic that the FDA has done historically, by controlling the media to cover up the crimes of Big Pharma.

We reported about this criminal activity with the FDA in an article we published back in 2016:

In an October 2016 article in Scientific American, we learned how the FDA and numerous other medical research publications manipulate the media’s access to information. This process, known as a “close-hold embargo,” results in key media sources simultaneously publishing the same information without doing independent research.

Scientific American reported:

The press corps is primed for manipulation by a convention that goes back decades: the embargo. The embargo is a back-room deal between journalists and the people they cover—their sources. A source grants the journalist access on condition that he or she cannot publish before an agreed-on date and time.

A surprisingly large proportion of science and health stories are the product of embargoes. Most of the major science journals offer reporters advance copies of upcoming articles—and the contact information of the authors—in return for agreeing not to run with the story until the embargo expires. These embargoes set the weekly rhythm of science coverage: On Monday afternoon, you may see a bunch of stories about the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA published almost simultaneously. Tuesday, it’s the Journal of the American Medical Association. On Wednesday, it’s Nature and the New England Journal of Medicine. Science stories appear on Thursday.

Other institutions have also adopted the embargo system. Federal institutions, especially the ones science and health journalists report on, have as well. Embargoes are the reason that stories about the National Laboratories, the National Institutes of Health and other organizations often tend to break at the precisely same time. [9]

This is how the close-hold embargo process works. A select group of reporters from high profile media outlets are invited to a private briefing, for example, at the FDA headquarters, to learn about rules governing a new product. The reporters who attend must make a commitment not to publish their stories until a certain date and time. They must also agree not to attempt to obtain reactions to the story from sources beyond the list of official sources provided by the FDA during the embargo, or to mention the existence of the embargo.

Each reporter has the identical set of information and the same amount of time to prepare their story. Since each reporter and their employer wishes to be seen as the one who broke the news to the public, they will all publish their stories at the moment the embargo has passed. They will not delay the publication by taking time to interview other sources who may have alternative points of view.

Once the initial set of stories is published by top-tier media organizations such as NPR, CBS, NBC, CNN, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, then other media sources will use those reports as templates for preparing their own stories. They will also try to move as fast as possible, to avoid the appearance of publishing “old news.”

While all this rapid reporting of the official government controlled news is going on, the real story is often missed. The real story might lie in the deep controversy that was omitted or hidden by the FDA’s initial presentation. The truth may lie buried until the alternative media digs into the full set of facts and interviews the people who have dedicated their careers and even their lives to speaking about truth in a certain area. (Source.)

A report published in 2019 by the Pacific Legal Foundation found that 98% of the rulings passed by the FDA, which effectively become “laws,” were Constitutionally illegal. See:

Study: 98% of FDA Laws Are Unconstitutional

It’s time to abolish the FDA. They do not protect the rights of Americans, but the profits of Big Pharma.

Here is the BMJ interview from our Bitchute channel (since YouTube may at some point ban it). The original on Youtube is here.

See the related article where I expose the Facebook fact checkers on Health Impact News articles.

The Thousands of Fetal Deaths Recorded After COVID-19 Vaccines that Nobody Wants to Report and that Facebook is Trying Hard to Censor

Source: https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/how-the-criminal-fda-protects-big-pharma-by-controlling-the-media/

One thought on “How the Criminal FDA Protects Big Pharma by Controlling the Media

  1. FUDGING/BLOATING/LYING ABOUT ‘COVID DEATHS’ FIGURES – COOKING THE BOOKS See >
    AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS – AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT – FUDGE THE FIGURES DOCUMENT – COOKING THE BOOKS
    https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1205.0.55.001
    Due to the public health importance of COVID-19, the TOTALLY CORRUPTED World Health Organisation WHO have directed that the new coronavirus strain be recorded as the underlying cause of death, ie, the disease or condition that initiated the train of morbid events, when it is recorded as having caused or contributed to death.
    1205.0.55.001 – Information Paper: Cause of Death Certification Australia, 2008
    ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 25/11/2008
    This document was added or updated on 25/03/2020.
    Guidance for Certifying Deaths due to COVID-19
    This guide published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics is intended to provide some immediate guidance on how the new coronavirus disease strain, i.e. COVID-19, should be recorded on the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death. Examples are included in section 5 of this document.
    6. Coding of deaths due to covid-19
    The Australian Bureau of Statistics assign codes from the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision to all conditions listed on the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO has issued emergency code U07.1 COVID-19 to be assigned to all mentions of COVID-19 on the death certificate.
    LOOK LOOK LOOK AT WHAT THESE CRIMINAL BASTARDS HAVE DONE >>> Due to the public health importance of COVID-19, the WHO have directed that the new coronavirus strain be recorded as the underlying cause of death, ie, the disease or condition that initiated the train of morbid events, when it is recorded as having caused or contributed to death. <<>>>>>Following the guidelines above will assist in the accurate coding of these deaths and the production of robust national mortality statistics.<<<<<
    Australia’s own medical regulator AHPRA — Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. A regulator that can’t even regulate itself.
    The true meaning of malfeasance is AHPRA — corrupt to the core | devious and inept | runs amok with power and self-importance | answerable to no one | operates in clandestine | lying is its modus operandi | run by staff sacked from Health Departments…
    AHPRA has not got a clue what investigation means. Evidence and facts? They don’t worry about that. They manufacture it and stick to it. Woe betide challenging it.
    Just take a look at the AHPRA state and territory branches and who they are run by. Yes, the old heads of state medical boards. They just slithered into positions with the new national medical board for further self-aggrandizement and same old misinformation and obfuscation aka cover-ups continue. A medical mafia.
    Continue >
    https://www.medicalerroraustralia.com/spotlight/ahpra-malfeasant-arrogant-complacent/
    https://www.medicalerroraustralia.com/
    https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/mental-health/there-are-serious-problems-in-our-medical-industry-with-an-alarming-number-of-doctors-taking-their-own-lives/news-story/ce098d0408daaef6cde812389230e2df

    See >
    Why the WHO Is a Corrupt, Unhealthy Organization
    Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a guardian of public health needs to be seriously reevaluated.
    Continue >
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/why-who-corrupt-unhealthy-organization/5754889
    CDC and WHO Corrupt Financial Entanglements with the Vaccine Industry
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/cdc-who/
    Why You Can’t Trust the FDA, the WHO, the CDC, the AAP, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi or Pfizer
    https://stateofthenation.co/?p=24045
    Congress invests big in pharmaceutical, tech stocks
    https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/04/dc-lawmakers-stocks-pharmaceutical-tech/

    WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (WHO is heavily) conflicted and controlled by industry
    Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a guardian of public health needs to be seriously reevaluated.
    Continue >
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/why-who-corrupt-unhealthy-organization/5754889

    New Analysis reveals how much Big Pharma CONTROLS “The Science”
    The Medical Profession is being bought by the Pharmaceutical Industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The Academic Institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the Pharmaceutical Industry. I think it’s disgraceful.
    Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014) Harvard Professor of Medicine and Former Editor in Chief of the NEJM
    http://www.renegadetribune.com/new-analysis-reveals-how-much-big-pharma-controls-the-science/

    The GLOBAL HEALTH ORGANISATION is launching TO EXPOSE The GATES CON World Health Organisation
    https://www.australiannationalreview.com/global-issues/the-global-health-organisation-is-launching-to-expose-the-gates-con-who/

    World premiere: Covid vaccination under criminal investigation in England
    https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/world-premiere-covid-vaccination-under-criminal-investigation-in-england/

    Modern Day Censorship Covid 19 Pharmaceutical Giants Gates Fauci UK Officials Accused of Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Court Complaint
    The ICC has acknowledged the case and has attributed the following reference number OTP-CR-473/21.
    https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/covid-19-pharmaceutical-giants-gates-fauci-uk-officials-accused-of-crimes-against-humanity-in-international-criminal-court-complaint/
    See >
    BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
    (TREATY OF ROME STATUTE, ART. 15.1 AND 53) December 6, 2021
    Based on the extensive claims and enclosed documentation, we charge those responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the United Kingdom, but not limited to individuals in these countries.
    Perpetrators: Prime Minister for the United Kingdom BORIS JOHNSON, Chief Medical Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government CHRISTOPHER WHITTY, (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care MATTHEW HANCOCK, (current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care SAJID JAVID, Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) JUNE RAINE, DirectorGeneral of the World Health Organisation TEDROS ADANHOM GHEBREYESUS, Cochair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation WILLIAM GATES III and Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation MELINDA GATES, Chairman and Chief executive officer of Pfizer ALBERT BOURLA, Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca STEPHANE BANCEL, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna PASCAL SORIOT, Chief Executive of Johnson and Johnson ALEX GORSKY, President of the Rockefeller Foundation DR RAJIV SHAH, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) DR ANTHONY FAUCI, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum
    KLAUS SCWAB, President of EcoHealth Alliance DR PETER DASZACK
    https://www.riotimesonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/icc-complaint-7-1.pdf

    Dr. Richard Fleming a crucial and extremely detailed presentation
    https://www.flemingmethod.com/

    STOP GLOBAL TOTALITARIANISM !! STOP The Global Public Health World Order from legally binding 194 nations to MEDICAL MARTIAL LAW
    https://crazzfiles.com/who-calls-for-new-global-public-health-world-order-to-legally-bind-194-nations-to-medical-martial-law/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.