March 29, 2024

Crazz Files

Exposing the Dark Truth of Our World

Mandated Covid jabs – are health practitioners indemnified without ‘voluntary informed consent’?

For the attention of:

Mark Butler
Minister for Health and Aged Care
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care

Mark Butler, millions of Australians are being pressed to have Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’ over and over
again, against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat for most people, despite all the fear mongering hype and gaslighting of the global community. (See for example Laura Dodsworth’s book about the UK experience – A State of Fear, which describes how the Boris Johnson / UK government weaponised fear in response to Covid-19.)

Are people giving their ‘voluntary informed consent’ to these medical interventions? Are people being properly informed about the risks of Covid-19 in their own particular health circumstances, including parents of children?

The Morrison, and now Albanese, government has facilitated the unprecedented mass population Covid-19 jab rollout, with many people being pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to the jabs under mandates.

It’s astonishing…mandated medical interventions in the supposed liberal democracy of Australia, what an appalling situation. It’s bewildering that the medical profession has not challenged mandated medical interventions.

How can people give ‘voluntary informed consent’ under Covid-19 jab mandates?

Mark Butler, you are personally pressing Australians to have Covid-19 jabs, as reported in The Canberra Times: Health Minister Mark Butler urges Australians to take fourth and third COVID-19 vaccines, 26 September 2022. (Copy attached.)

You say: “I do say to the Australian people take whatever booster is available to you now, they are all very effective.”

They’re all ‘very effective”? Really? What’s your definition of ‘effective’? And you forgot to mention ‘safe’ – how safe are they?

It’s also notable The Canberra Times reports: “The federal government says it does not known [sic] how long a COVID-19 vaccine lasts, but recommends a third dose three months after receiving a second jab.”

This is mind-blowing… The Albanese government admits it doesn’t know how long a Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ lasts, but says have another one after three months. The Albanese government is subjecting the Australian population, including children, to a massive experiment and admitting these taxpayer-funded medical interventions are guesswork!!!

Mark Butler, you’re using your position as ‘health minister’ to pressure people to submit to the jabs you questionably describe as ‘very effective’, the jabs the Albanese government has no idea how long they ‘last’… I suggest you should be extremely careful about the medical advice you personally provide to the Australian people.

On the subject of medical advice, I’m currently seeking clarification on the medical indemnity insurance position of health practitioners who jab people under Covid-19 jab mandates, e.g. via State and Territory Government directions, plus mandates instigated by employers/businesses, sports clubs, entertainment and hospitality venues, retail, etc.

It seems millions of Australians have been subject to jab mandates – so much for the sophistry of the Albanese government’s assurance that

page1image3534442912page1image3534443200 page1image3534443488page1image3534443776

What is the medical indemnity insurance situation for health practitioners who have not obtained authentic

page1image3534456096

‘voluntary informed consent’ before these medical interventions?

“Vaccination for COVID-19 is voluntary – as are all vaccinations in Australia – and

. What’s the choice? To submit to the jabs or else forsake one’s livelihood, or even participation in civil society under the most broad mandates, e.g. No Jab, No Job; and No Jab, No

Life? So much for ‘the option to choose’…

Mark Butler, on this subject, please see my email below to Natasha Fenech, Group CEO and Managing Director of the Avant Mutual Group, a medical indemnity insurance provider. Similar emails have also been forwarded to other insurance providers MDA National, Medical Indemnity Protection Society and TEGO; and also to the presidents of doctors’ organisations the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; the Royal Australasian College of Physicians; the Australian Medical Association; and the Australian Medical Professionals Society; plus Peter Malinauskas, premier of South Australia; and Martin Fletcher, CEO of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA).

I look forward to your carefully considered response – this is a vitally important matter of public interest, and the Albanese government is accountable.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Elizabeth Hart <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 5:29 PM
Subject: Failure to obtain informed consent for Covid jabs – what is the indemnity insurance position of health practitioners?
To: <[email protected]>

Please forward this email:

For the attention of:

Natasha Fenech
Group CEO and Managing Director Avant Mutual Group

Natasha Fenech, what is the indemnity insurance position of health practitioners who inject patients with Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’, knowing the patient is subject to a Covid jab mandate?

It’s important to clarify this matter as many people, including health practitioners, have been, and are being, mandated to have Covid-19 jabs via State and Territory Government directions, plus mandates instigated by employers/businesses, sports clubs, entertainment and hospitality venues, retail, etc.

The Covid-19 jabs are ‘leaky vaccines’ that do not prevent infection nor transmission, and purportedly provide ‘protection’ of very limited duration against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people. What is the evidence supporting these mandated medical interventions, impacting upon people of a variety of ages and health status?

The Covid jab mandates conflict with the obligation for health practitioners to obtain ‘voluntary informed consent’ before a medical intervention, i.e. as described in The Australian Immunisation Handbook, under Valid consent, i.e.

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) has also confirmed to me in writing that practitioners have an obligation to obtain informed consent, i.e.

Meanwhile…what does it mean if health practitioners aren’t obtaining ‘voluntary informed consent’ before

these often mandated medical interventions? Are they covered by their medical indemnity insurance if they

fail to obtain authentic ‘voluntary informed consent’ before the jabs? Have AHPRA, the medical indemnity

insurers, and the doctors’ professional organisations sought clarification on this vitally important ethical,

and potentially legal, matter which has come to a head with the Covid-19 jab rollout?

page2image3463827968

“For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present…It must be given

page2image3463819072

voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation…It can only be given after the

page2image3463874944

potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options

page2image3463894128

have been explained to the person.”

page2image3463898864

“Practitioners have an obligation to obtain informed consent

page2image3463906128

for treatment, including vaccination. Informed consent is a person’s voluntary decision about health care that

page2image3463918768

See AHPRA letter dated 21 A factsheet published by the Australian Government Operation COVID Shield notes: (Copy attached.)

is made with knowledge and understanding of the benefits and risks involved.”

September 2021, copy attached.

people maintain the option to choose”

page3image3464159760

As a health professional you:

page3image3463772464

– require informed consent from a patient prior to providing them with a vaccination; and

page3image3463781120

– have a duty of care to ensure patients are making educated and informed decisions about

page3image3463850864

vaccination.

The Operation COVID Shield factsheet notes:

Presumably millions of people in Australia have now been injected with Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’ via State and Territory Government directions, and mandates instigated by employers/businesses, sports clubs, entertainment and hospitality venues, retail, etc.

As many people have been pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to the Covid-19 jabs via mandates, how can they have given ‘voluntary informed consent’ in accordance with The Australian Immunisation Handbook, the AHPRA confirmation letter dated 21 September 2021, and the Australian Government Operation COVID Shield factsheet?

Natasha Fenech,

This is a most important matter of public interest, and I request your early response.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © Crazz Files | Newsphere by AF themes.