The Manipulation of Language
“Safe” does not mean “safe” and “Isolated” does not mean isolated.
The process of validating “safety” involves turning human beings into sociopaths1 who can calmly torture a helpless animal because they are told to validate an outcome.
Such a process is propaganda masquerading as “science”.
Investigations classified as “testing” include experiments that are conducted to ascertain the “safety” of chemical ingredients used in manufactured products, many of which are everyday items used by millions of people around the world. …however, testing their safety clearly relies on the idea that it is only the dose that makes a substance toxic; an idea that has been shown to be false. …
The existence of non-measurable effects is significant for animal experiments conducted to determine the “safe dose” of chemicals. Animals cannot express many of the effects they experience; therefore, researchers cannot know all of the effects produced by any chemical.
Medical research experiments that are intended to ascertain the safety of a drug suffer from the same limitations as those for chemical testing. The ingredients of pharmaceuticals are chemicals, which interact with a variety of other chemicals and many of these interactions may be synergistic. The lack of testing of all possible combinations of all substances means however, that there is a major knowledge gap, with respect to all of the effects that may be produced by interactions between the many hundreds of thousands of chemicals that now pervade the environment. …
The inability of “science” to test these effects on an intact living human organism means that assurances of “safety” cannot be relied upon. ~ What Really Makes You Ill2
Even when it’s blatantly obvious that a person’s environment has sickened them, “viral” boogey-bugs are forced into the picture. If ever there was an “epidemic” that reeked of man-made, external toxins injected (possibly literally) into the unassuming citizenry it was “SMON”.
Subacute Myelo-Optic Neuropathy (SMON) is an iatrogenic disease of the nervous system leading to a disabling paralysis, blindness and even death. Its defining manifestation was as an epidemic in Japan during the 1960s: the Japanese government estimated 11,000 were affected; however, the College of Medicine at the University of Tokyo put the number at 30,000, citing a lack of preservation of medical records for longer than five years and a lack of cooperation from doctors as the reasons for the discrepancy. ~ Wikipedia
Iatrogenesis is the causation of a disease, a harmful complication, or other ill effect by any medical activity, including diagnosis, intervention, error, or negligence. First used in this sense in 1924, the term was introduced to sociology in 1976 by Ivan Illich, alleging that industrialized societies impair quality of life by overmedicalizing life. Iatrogenesis may thus include mental suffering via medical beliefs or a practitioner’s statements. …
The term iatrogenesis means brought forth by a healer, from the Greek ἰατρός (iatros, “healer”) and γένεσις (genesis, “origin”); as such, in its earlier forms, it could refer to good or bad effects. ~ Wikipedia
“Iatrogenesis” is a very ineffective way of communicating the concept of a “healer” who does harm. Humanity has been experiencing it for as long as the “profession” has existed: well before “1924”. As I noted in my book Illuminati Unmasked, Protestant hero of the English Civil War Oliver Cromwell and his daughter were murdered by a Royalist “doctor”.
On January 20th, 1649, Charles I was executed for treason.
A series of feckless Parliaments were raised and dissolved and Oliver Cromwell was the only man with strength to rule yet the restraint not become an autocrat. Cromwell held the title of “Lord Protector” and when he was offered the crown in 1657 he refused in fury. Why had they cut the head off of one king only to raise up another?
While Cromwell reigned, England was free.
But less than a decade from the death of England’s traitor sovereign, Oliver Cromwell’s daughter, Elizabeth, fell ill. A doctor was sent to her but she died despite his care.
Shortly thereafter, Cromwell started to suffer from what some have called “malaria” and the same doctor attended him. He died on September 3rd, 1658 at only 59 years old, the anniversary of his two greatest victories at Dunbar and Worcester.3
Accounts of his death have caused experts to now question if he was poisoned.480
In an entry for the Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, Dr. Leonard Jan Bruce-Chwatt, an expert in malaria481, uncovered Cromwell’s healer as his killer—George Bate, physician to secret Catholic Charles I and a Royalist.482
Shortly after Cromwell’s death, Charles II was rushed back from exile in Scotland and reinstituted as the monarch of England. On his deathbed, he converted to Roman Catholicism.483 ~ Cirucci4
However, a look into Ivan Illich shows why he is preferred by “history” and “user-edited Wikipedia”.
Ivan Dominic Illich (4 September 1926 – 2 December 2002) was a Roman Catholic priest, theologian, philosopher, and social critic. …
Ivan Dominic Illich was born on September 4, 1926 in Vienna, Austria, to Gian Pietro Ilic (Ivan Peter Illich) and Ellen Rose “Maexie” née Regenstreif-Ortlieb. His father was a civil engineer and a diplomat from a landed Catholic family of Dalmatia, with property in the city of Split and wine and olive oil estates on the island of Brač. His mother came from a Jewish family that had converted to Christianity from Germany and Austria-Hungary (Czernowitz, Bukowina). Ellen Illich was baptized Lutheran but converted to Catholicism upon marriage. Her father, Friedrich “Fritz” Regenstreif, was an industrialist who made his money in the lumber trade in Bosnia, to later settle in Vienna, where he built an art nouveau villa.
While working on his doctorate, he returned to Italy where he studied theology and philosophy at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, as he wanted to become a Catholic priest. He was ordained as a Catholic priest in Rome in 1951 and served his first Mass in the catacombs… ~ Wikipedia 5
A Japanese “virologist” working for Anthony Fauci’s “National Institute of Health” on behalf of the United States government injected toxins directly into the brains of helpless monkeys and when the poor animals became paralyzed he claimed his “eureka” moment.6
Although Kono had opened the door for alternative research directions, the virus hunt accelerated—for just at this time, some key scientific claims by English and American virologists were beginning to have a profound impact on virus research worldwide, and particularly on SMON research in Japan. The first came in the early 1960s from virologist Carleton Gajdusek of the American National Institutes of Health, who reported finding evidence of the first “slow virus” in humans. (A slow virus is a virus alleged to produce a disease long after the original infection, that is, after a long “latent period.” See chapter 3.) He believed it to be the cause of kuru disease among New Guinea natives. Kuru was a slowly progressing neurological disease that led to the debilitation of motor skills. The patients presented with symptoms of tremor and paralysis similar to Parkinson’s disease. Gajdusek claimed to have found the kuru virus, but his methods were highly unusual by any scientific standards. He had never actually isolated a virus but instead had ground up the diseased brains of dead kuru victims and injected these unpurified mixtures into the brains of living monkeys.
When some of the monkeys showed deficits in motor skills, Gajdusek published his findings in the world’s oldest scientific journal, Nature, and was lauded by his fellow virologists. ~ Duesberg7
What makes more sense: a “virus” causes disease after a “long latent period” or a vaccine injected into the victim imparts just enough thimerosal, mercury or other toxin to debilitate that victim years sometimes decades afterward?
Had real scientists searched the environment of New Guinea they would almost certainly have discovered outside influences of pollution and poison effecting the natives.
Doctor Tom Cowan, Sally Morrell and Doctor Andrew Kaufman made a definitive public statement regarding “virus” isolation. Sadly, as revolutionary as they are towards “viruses” and “germ theory” they lack enlightenment in regards to the abuse of animals for “science”. It is a stark and disturbing shortcoming.
Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)
Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness. – Oxford English Dictionary
The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:
* the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
* the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
* “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
* it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.
In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages1 and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.
These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.2 (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)3
1 Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, Kenya, Juliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019. — accessed 15 FEB 21
2 “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2. — accessed 15 FEB 21
3 “The Role of Extraellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.
The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.
From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:
1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.
If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?
Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?
Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.
We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.
SOVI on Andrew Kaufman’s website with accompanying petition (please visit and sign).
Vero cells are a lineage of cells used in cell cultures. The “Vero” lineage was isolated from kidney epithelial cells extracted from an African green monkey. ~ Wikipedia
The use of “Vero cultures” and all their facsimiles (tissue ripped from every vulnerable animal and human baby imaginable) to propagate the frauds of “virus isolation” or vaccine fabrication is definitive on two points:
1. The pseudo-disciplines of “immunology”, “virology”, “microbiology”, etc. are frauds with no basis in the Scientific Method. Rather than isolating and eliminating variables, variables teaming with similar and confusing biological material are infused into samples for the express purpose of contaminating the process.
2. All those involved in “immunology”, “virology”, “microbiology”, etc. are compromised sociopaths devoid of human empathy and, therefore, a danger to all mankind.
Engineer, politician and entrepreneur V. A. Shiva Ayyadurai has spearheaded one very excellent solution.
CytoSolve, Inc. was founded in 2011 by Dr. V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai, M.I.T. Ph.D. in Biological Engineering, the Inventor of Email, Fulbright Scholar, and world-renowned systems scientist. CytoSolve was a result of Dr. V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai’s M.I.T. Ph.D. research and a fulfilment of his life-long mission to enable human health and well-being by developing medicines and protocols, integrating Science and Tradition, Ancient and Modern, East and West.
The trillion-dollar pharmaceutical industry is in peril because of its medieval product development approach that is unable to predict toxicity and risk upfront in the development process. Meanwhile, the emerging market for supplements, herbs, and functional foods, while a potential alternative to conventional medical interventions such as drugs, vaccines and cell therapies, is producing products in an ad-hoc and unscientific manner. CytoSolve provides a revolutionary technology platform for addressing the major problems across both conventional and alternative industries by addressing a fundamental problem in the product development of pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, vaccines, supplements, functional foods, and cosmeceuticals: the inability to determine efficacy and toxicity, upfront in the product development process, without the need for animal testing and risk to humans during clinical trials.
CytoSolve provides the world’s first computational systems biology platform for scalable integration of molecular pathway models to enable predictive and quantitative understanding of complex biomolecular processes and diseases to determine risk, toxicity, and efficacy UPFRONT in the product development process. CytoSolve’s technology platform is enabling innovative and visionary manufacturers to develop and deliver products to end-consumers that truly advance health and well-being, faster, cheaper, and safer. For example, CytoSolve is empowering the scientific analysis for the qualitative-quantitative determination of key parameters in the Certified C.L.E.A.N. and Certified R.A.W. certifications, that is supporting healthy product decisions by the end-consumer. ~ About Us (CytoSolve)
In their book The Contagion Myth, Cowan and Morrell give repeated examples of medical corruption leading up to what can accurately be labeled the coronavirus plandemic or scamdemic.
Here’s what the authors of the original papers that found and linked the “novel” coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) to the disease now called “Covid-19” have to say. The following quotations come from the brilliant paper “Covid-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless,” by Torsten Englebrecht and Konstantin Demeter.8
Referring to a published image in a paper claiming to have isolated a new virus, they say, “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”
If it’s not purified virus, how do the authors know whether or not it is even a virus, what it is, or where it came from?9
In the paper “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with Covid-19,” the authors stated: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.” In other words, they did not isolate the virus, even though they claim to do so in the title.10
In the article “Virus Isolated from the First Patient with SARSCoV-2 in Korea,” the authors admitted, “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”11 In other words, the authors have no idea whether or not the sample is purified, as an electron micrograph is the only way to determine that. They then claim to have characterized the genetic material of something they never purified, having no idea what they were looking at. This was an important study, as it describes the first case of “Covid-19” in Korea.
Finally, the article “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China,” states: “We show an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”12 The researchers took nasal mucus (“snot”) from sick people, centrifuged it (which is not a purification step) and then showed a fuzzy picture of what they found. Then they carried out a “genetic analysis” of this sediment in order to characterize the “novel” coronavirus. This piece of fraud was published in the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine.8
Title verses Profession
Lower-case “doctor” is a profession, “Doctor” is a title.
The word “doctor” comes from the secret cypher language of Rome—“docēre”—which means “to instruct” or indoctrinate. Scams like “doctoring” or “law” use the language of Rome to mask their crimes and keep themselves insulated from us, you, “the masses”.
Being a “Doctor” has nothing to do with healing and the Vatican uses the word in its true form as a title for its agents. By example (we’re taught to say exempli gratia), Dominican9 Priest10 Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274) is a Doctor Universalis / Doctor Communis, the “Instructor for All”.
Can “Doctors” or “Scientists” qualitatively state that they have verified the tiny threats they scare us with?
* “Doctors” speak with certainty but they have not personally validated their assertions.
* Tools that are needed such as a centrifuge and electron microscope are expensive and rare.
> The use of a centrifuge makes it likely that whatever is supposedly being “isolated” has first been mixed with something else.
> This is in direct violation of the Scientific Method which states that variables need to be truly isolated, not added.
> To a “microbiologist”, “virologist” or “immunologist”, “isolation” does not mean isolation just like “medicine” does not mean healthcare.
* “Doctors” simply regurgitate what they have been told and the follow-on question is, “What if you have incorrect indoctrination?” The average Blue Pill may need encouragement to accept this but it’s completely intuitive:
> Money is power.
> Lots and lots of money is power above the law.
> Human nature is self-serving and sees all other humans as threats.
> THEREFORE: it is not “conspiracy theory” to hypothesize the uber-wealthy corrupting the entire field of so-called “medicine” to our designed detriment.
* On the very, very rare occasion that a “Scientist” can actually verify that which the average person can not, the circumstances make that “verification” unacceptable and thoroughly unscientific.
> Samples of fluids or tissues are never in a living, healthy condition. This is in direct violation of the Scientific Method.
> The target in an electron microscope is not visualized in the normal sense. They are lit from behind and their translucency dictates the clarity as does the magnification and various types of light. These variations make distortion guaranteed.
> “Scientists” are given the endstate and told to find any semblance of evidence to prove that endstate. This bias thoroughly invalidates their “findings”. Like numerology, an infinite number of combinations can be repeatedly tried until the desired result is achieved.
> Even “peer review” is a process thoroughly corrupted by money and malignancy. “Peer Review” is the final stage in the Scientific Method but the method has been invalidated because previous stages have not been adhered to:
— Make an observation.
— Formulate a (“an”) hypothesis that explains the observation.
— Conduct an experiment in an attempt to replicate the observation. It is critical that the experiment be done in a completely sterile environment with all variables isolated. Depending upon the experiment and the tools available, this step may be difficult or even impossible. All steps must be meticulously recorded and available (Pasteur’s notes and journals were kept secret by his command to his family for a century).
— Present your findings to a peer of equal or greater acumen and experience to be replicated. If they replicate your findings by strictly adhering to your steps the probability that your hypothesis is accurate increases but is not definitive. The more it is replicated, the greater the probability that the hypothesis is accurate.
SOURCE: (hat-tip Andrew Kaufman)
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, John P. A. Ioannidis
UPDATE: “I KNOW SOMEONE WHO DIED!”
Response to frustrated Flying Monkey Brent, whose post is below—
The “experts”—politicians, “doctors”, “scientists”, billionaires, Big Tech, Big Pharma, movie stars—are lying.
But the question(s) I keep getting are: “So, you are saying no one died or is dying?”
I just told you: The “experts”—politicians, “doctors”, “scientists”, billionaires, Big Tech, Big Pharma, movie stars—are lying.
“You can’t tell me that. I know someone who is friends with someone who heard of someone whose babysitter’s hairdresser has a dog walker and her whole family died!!!”
Your anecdotal story is very tragic but in no way does it qualify as a legitimate investigation nor verifiable science.
Did the person you say died of the coronavirus drop dead in front of you? Has anyone dropped dead from this “contagion” in their home or in the street the way a “pandemic” is supposed to kill people or did they disappear in a “hospital” only to have a “doctor” tell you that the coronavirus killed them?
“I know someone that died of the coronavirus.”
I’m sure you do. “Doctors” kill hundreds of thousands of people every year.
This makes them the third largest source of death to humanity.
The “Center for Disease Control” states that the “number one cause” is heart disease and “number two cause” is cancer.
“Heart disease” is the result of a lifetime of bad habits and toxic ingestion (like water impregnated with fluoride) which “doctors” never warn you of. Instead, they become drug salesmen and prescribe clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor which cause new problems for your already overwhelmed body to deal with. Often, these effects are far worse than the original complaint!
Antiplatelet drugs can cause diarrhea, rash, or itching, abdominal pain, headache, chest pain, muscle aches, and dizziness.
Side effects of anticoagulants are bleeding and necrosis (gangrene) of the skin.
Side effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors include cough, elevated blood potassium levels (hyperkalemia), low blood pressure, dizziness, headache, drowsiness, weakness, abnormal taste, and rash.
Taking vasodilators may cause lightheadedness or dizziness, increased or irregular heart rate, or headache.
Side effects of calcium channel blockers include constipation, nausea, headache, rash, edema, low blood pressure, drowsiness, and dizziness.
Anti-arrhythmics may cause dizziness, blurred vision, anorexia, unusual taste, fatigue, nausea and vomiting. ~ RxList
Cancer is also the body’s reaction to a lifetime of poisoning. It is the final stage a body goes through when it’s been overwhelmed with toxins.
Sadly, if you are foolish enough to put yourself in the hands of “doctors” once you’ve been diagnosed with cancer, they are guaranteed (by a 97.9% margin) to kill you.
That goes beyond simple corruption and qualifies as a war crime conducted by an entire profession and class against humanity.
Since we now see that “heart disease” and cancer are equally caused by “doctors”, we can now say definitively that “doctors” are the overwhelming number one cause of death to human beings at a staggering 1,700,000 annually (660,000 for “heart disease”, 600,000 for cancer and 440,000 by direct malfeasance).
This is how I can be so cynical.
- —one who has cauterized their innate compassion and empathy: destroyed their humanity for personal gain.
- What Really Makes You Ill: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong, Dawn Lester and David Parker, independently published, (2019), pp. 299, 303, 315
- —a sure sign that he was assassinated.
- Illuminati Unmasked: Everything you need to know about the “New World Order” and how we will beat it. Giovanni “Johnny” Cirucci, CreateSpace (27 January 2015), p. 155
- —a Priest from the powerful Papal city of Vienna, who studied “theology” at Loyola’s inaugural College, whose mother was a Jew that initially followed Luther but converted to Catholicism: we here at Team Cirucci call this “Jesidue”.
- It takes a special kind of Mengele monster to do such a thing. Perhaps this is why Kono was scoured for by the U.S. government and found in Japan.
- Inventing the AIDS Virus, Peter H. Duesberg and Bryan J. Ellison, Regnery Publishing (1996), pp. 16-17
- The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (including “Coronavirus”) Are Not the Cause of Disease, Thomas S. Cowan MD, Sally Fallon-Morell, Skyhorse (29 SEP 2020) pp. 90-91
- The Dominicans were the chosen order of militant Catholicism before the advent of Loyola’s Company.
- —capitalized because it’s a title within Catholicism.