Crazz Files

Exposing the Dark Truth of Our World

Stroke Risk: COVID Shots 200 Times More Likely to Cause Blood Clots in Brain

The COVID-19 vaccines had an over 1,000-fold increased risk of blood clots in the brain compared to the flu vaccine and more than a 200-fold increased risk compared to all other vaccines, according to a study by Dr. Peter McCullough and colleagues.


The COVID-19 vaccines carry a much higher risk of blood clots in the brain compared with other vaccines, according to a new study by Dr. Peter McCullough and colleagues.

The researchers looked at reports in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from January 1990 through December 2023.

They counted the number of cerebral thromboembolism events — as in, blood clots of the brain’s veins or arteries — reported in people who received a COVID-19 shot compared with those who received a flu shot or other vaccines.

Blood clots that block blood flow to the brain account for roughly 87% of all strokes, according to the American Stroke Association, a division of the American Heart Association.

McCullough — a cardiologist with over 1,000 publications and over 685 citations in the National Library of Medicine — told The Defender the study showed “an unacceptable risk of catastrophic thrombotic injuries to the brain” in individuals who took one or more COVID-19 shots.

McCullough summarized the study’s results on Substack:

“Compared to influenza vaccines given over 34 years, COVID-19 vaccines in 36 months of use had over 1000-fold increased risk of most blood clot events, and compared to all vaccines combined administered over 34 years, this risk remained at over 200-times greater with COVID-19 vaccination.”

Prior research has suggested that the spike protein in both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 vaccine can cause serious blood clotting, McCullough and his co-authors noted in their report.

Blood clots in the brain are difficult to treat, McCullough told The Defender, and “oftentimes leave patients with devastating disabilities.”

“This and other sources of data,” he added, “support calls to remove all COVID-19 vaccines from public use.”

The study — co-authored with Claire Rogers, Dr. James Thorp and Kirstin Cosgrove — is under peer review and available online as a preprint.

Women especially at risk

For the study, McCullough and his co-authors used 12 search terms to find VAERS reports of adverse events related to blood clots in the brain: cavernous sinus thrombosis, cerebral artery thrombosis, cerebral infarction, cerebral thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, cerebral venous thrombosis, embolic cerebral infarction, ischaemic cerebral infarction, sigmoid sinus thrombosis, superior sagittal sinus thrombosis, thrombotic cerebral infarction and transverse sinus thrombosis.

In the three years since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, they found 5,137 reports of a brain blood clot event in those who received one or more COVID-19 shots.

Meanwhile, VAERS data showed only 52 reports since 1990 of a brain blood clot event following a flu vaccine and 282 since 1990 following all other vaccinations, they said.

The actual number of events may be higher due to underreporting in VAERS, they said, for several reasons.

First, CDC staff may have “tremendous difficulty” in processing the reports due to an overwhelming increase in VAERS reports since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Also, clinicians may not have the necessary awareness and knowledge to recognize injuries as being vaccine-related and thus may not report them in VAERS.

Moreover, they added, “The VAERS database is well known for its difficulty in entering events, making it even more challenging for healthcare workers to submit each event with limited time in a hospital or clinic setting.”

The authors said their findings are especially concerning for women of reproductive age — who are particularly at risk for certain blood clotting events in the brain, such as cerebral venous thrombosis.

The American Heart Association said in a Jan. 29 review article that roughly two-thirds of all cerebral venous thrombosis cases occurred in women of reproductive age.

Given this reality, the study’s authors called for “an immediate global moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines … with an absolute contraindication in women of reproductive age.”

CDC: no plan to change COVID vaccine recommendations

The Defender asked the CDC if it planned to alter its COVID-19 vaccination recommendations in light of McCullough and his co-authors’ findings.

A CDC spokesperson told The Defender, the “CDC does not comment on findings or claims by individuals or organizations outside of CDC. Current CDC recommendations can be found here.”

The CDC has found the COVID-19 vaccines to be safe and effective, the spokesperson said. “The CDC continues to encourage Americans to get vaccinated, as the COVID-19 vaccination continues to be the best way to protect against serious illness.”

When asked specifically about the risks of COVID-19 vaccination for women of reproductive age, the CDC spokesperson directed The Defender to the CDC’s webpage COVID-19 Vaccines While Pregnant or Breastfeeding, which states that the vaccines are safe and effective.


4 thoughts on “Stroke Risk: COVID Shots 200 Times More Likely to Cause Blood Clots in Brain

  1. Still waiting for all these alleged criminal bastards who pushed this C0vid jab on to the global population / all those alleged mongrels who forced their employees and / or residents et al to be jabbed and all those complicit in this including all the so called \’medical professionals\’ who pushed this jab without knowing any or all the facts and thereby soiling/violating their sacred oath of patients\’ to be fully Informed Consent (mandating/duress/forcing/bullying/threatening job loss etc., is not consent) and First Do no Harm – we all await your most severe accountability and the harshest punishment possible for all the global deaths and injuries which has been allegedly totally covered up — and you had better not let these alleged big medical / big pharma / treacherous politicians / big media / big tech / elite thugs do it ever again.
    Stop the Australian Government from forming their own version of the CDC also.

    Parliamentary question – P-003358/2022
    European Parliament
    Priority question for written answer P-003358/2022
    to the Commission
    Rule 138
    Bernhard Zimniok (ID)
    At a meeting of the Special Committee held on 11 October to discuss the findings regarding COVID-19 pandemic and recommendations for the future, a Pfizer executive confirmed that the vaccine had never been tested for its ability to prevent the transmission of COVID before being put on the market.
    Data emerging since the introduction of the vaccine indicates that it is in fact unable to do so, thereby refuting the claim that the COVID-19 Digital Passport provides any guarantee of protection.

    1. Can the Commission say whether the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was aware that Pfizer/Biontech had failed to have the vaccine tested for its ability to prevent the spread of the virus before it was put on the market and whether the Commission itself was accordingly apprised of this?
    2. If not, how could the EMA and the Commission have been unaware that Pfizer/Biontech had not had its vaccine tested for its ability to prevent the spread of the virus before it was put on the market?
    3. When does the Commission intend act on this revelation and the clear body of evidence to the effect that the vaccination does not provide significant protection by abolishing the COVID-19 digital passport, which is only serving to discriminate against millions of European citizens without medical justification?

    Stroke Risk: COVID Shots 200 Times More Likely to Cause Blood Clots in Brain
    The COVID-19 vaccines had an over 1,000-fold increased risk of blood clots in the brain compared to the flu vaccine and more than a 200-fold increased risk compared to all other vaccines, according to a study by Dr. Peter McCullough and colleagues.
    Read more at The Defender >

    PLEASE continue and read full article as well as all highlighted links >

    Sonia Elijah investigates
    Source: Excess mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: ‘Our World in Data’ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022
    A bombshell study was recently published in BMJ Public Health by a group of researchers (Mostert et al.) from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. The group’s findings were shared in the mainstream media with The Telegraph daring to write: ‘Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths.’
    The researchers from The Netherlands analysed all-cause mortality reports abstracted from 47 countries using the ‘Our World in Data’ database. Only countries that had all-cause mortality reports available for all three consecutive years (2020–2022) were included. To calculate the baseline of expected deaths, a Karlinsky and Kobak’s estimate model was used. This model uses historical death data in a country from 2015 until 2019 and accounts for seasonal variation and year-to-year trends in mortality.
    The alarming results revealed:
    The total number of excess deaths in 47 countries of the Western World was 3,098,456 from 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2022. In 2020, the year of the COVID-19 pandemic onset and implementation of containment measures, records present 1,033,122 excess deaths. In 2021, the year in which both containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines were used to address virus spread and infection, the highest number of excess deaths was reported: 1,256,942 excess deaths. In 2022, when most containment measures were lifted and COVID-19 vaccines were continued, preliminary data present 808,392 excess deaths.
    Please continue to read full article >

  2. Enormous gratitude goes to and also for giving the truth to the people (by fighting back against the alleged disgusting global censorship/banning/fact checking/facebook pages disabled / you tube’s and other social media platforms et al to stop the truth getting to the rest of the population).

    I thought your readers might like to see that Spotlight show by channel 7.
    I have taken the opportunity to put a bit of information in for your readers to help, but most of your readers would be awake up to what’s really been going on.

    Here is the link for article Health professors roasted as Covid vax debate gets too hot for Seven program >
    Unfortunately on all my comments I have to remove or change the url as the comments were disappearing.

  3. More shocking truths for the Global Readers of your wonderful Website. Websites like yours are the only way the truth can be given to the people, (as global censorship/banning/disabling websites, disabling social media /video accounts etc., have been destroying/killing off our freedom of opinion, speech, information sharing, opposing views to Governments and their \’agendas\’), as the voices of truth, reason, integrity, honesty allegedly this atrocity of \’shutting up any opposing views) performed by Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Medicine, Big Media, Globalists, Elites, Treacherous Politicians et al., the total destruction of the Freedom, Rights and Choices of the People of the World.

    What really happened – See substack Article by Alison Bevage (Channel 7’s Spotlight program Sunday 30/06/24)
    What really happened on Channel 7’2s Spotlight Show >

    Alison’s insight into the alleged TGA & trial medicine:
    Alleged > “The TGA’s safety monitoring system consists of voluntary reporting. . .
    Doctors were ‘discouraged’ in March 2021 when the medical boards and AHPRA told them not to criticise the gene-vaccines on social media or face disciplinary action.
    The public had no idea how to report or even if they could.
    To monitor safety, the TGA tells drug companies to scan social media for reports of injuries.
    But the Home Affairs Department and the federal Health Department both told social media platforms to censor posts by gene-vaccine injured people, as revealed by Freedom of Information requests.
    This is insane.”
    More than insane, allegedly, it’s evidence of criminal intent to hide crucial safety signals in a trial.
    1. FDA-CDC* Oct 2020:
    CBER Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness Steve Anderson, PhD, MPP Director, Office of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, CBER VRBPAC Meeting October 22, 2020
    FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines:
    DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes ***Subject to change*** ▪ Guillain-Barré syndrome ▪ Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis ▪ Transverse myelitis ▪ Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/ meningoencephalitis/meningitis/ encepholapathy ▪ Convulsions/seizures ▪ Stroke ▪ Narcolepsy and cataplexy ▪ Anaphylaxis ▪ Acute myocardial infarction ▪ Myocarditis/pericarditis ▪ Autoimmune disease ▪ Deaths ▪ Pregnancy and birth outcomes ▪ Other acute demyelinating diseases ▪ Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions ▪ Thrombocytopenia ▪ Disseminated intravascular coagulation ▪ Venous thromboembolism ▪ Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain ▪ Kawasaki disease ▪ Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children ▪ Vaccine enhanced disease

    2. Pfizer* doc Feb 2021:
    Over 1000 known adverse conditions allegedly hidden from the public.

    The Truth About Covid – 1000 ways to lie

    Differential Increases in Excess Mortality in the German Federal States During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    February 2024
    Christof Kuhbandner
    Universität Regensburg
    Matthias Reitzner
    Universität Osnabrück
    ……..indicating that the increase in stillbirths was higher, the higher the vaccination rate.
    This correlational finding is in line with previous correlational findings in the temporal domain, showing that excess mortality was highest during the months with a high number of vaccinations.
    The fact that particularly high excess mortality occurs both in regions and in time windows in which many vaccinations took place provide strong correlational evidence that the vaccinations may have had a negative effect instead of a positive effect.

    German study shows that Covid vaccine has ‘no beneficial effects’ while enormously increasing excess mortality
    A new study from Germany has revealed that the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines have had “no beneficial effects” at the community level, while finding that “the more vaccinations administered in a federal state, the greater the increase in the excess mortality rate”.
    In other words, the vaccines did exactly the opposite of what we were told they would do and states with higher vaccination rates are suffering the most deaths, reports Baxter Dmitry .
    The study\’s pre-print paper is titled “Differential increase in excess mortality in the German federal states during the COVID-19 pandemic” and was conducted by Christof Kuhbandner, PhD, professor of psychology at the University of Regensburg in Germany, and mathematician Prof. Matthias Reitzner at the University of Osnabrück.
    Continue to read full article >

    So Minister, why is your $65m ‘Vaccine Queen’ not answering questions?
    AUSTRALIA’S “vaccine queen”, Professor Kristine Macartney, has gone AWOL at a time when questions are being asked in the Senate and elsewhere about the failure of the Federal Government to protect Australians from half-tested and often lethal mRNA vaccines.
    One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts recently asked Australia’s most senior medical bureaucrats and the big-shot Labor lady, Senator Katy Gallagher (Minister for Finance, Minister for Women, Minister for the Public Service), why Professor Macartney was absent from recent Senate Estimates Committee hearings.
    Prof Macartney is described in bios as an “expert consultant” to the World Health Organisation including the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety and COVID-19 in Education, and is chairwoman of all key Australian vaccine and communicable disease advisory committees.
    Detailed grant information (inserted comment inserted looks like she has removed that information!) provided on the CoFaux website show that the lead vaccine researchers driving all government policy in Australia received $65,330,038 in government grants covering 2020-2021. Prof. Macartney’s name appeared first on every item in a list of recipients of the grants, which according to CoFaux authors, mostly “appears to be money from the WHO, GAVI and PATH and or for “general support services”.
    Minister Gallagher dodged a question from Senator Roberts asking if she could confirm the $65 million figure and what the grants were used for and whether there was a conflict of interest from Macartney chairing the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS), which recommends if the federal government should add more vaccines to the schedule, and also the government’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines. He said it seemed like Gallagher had set up Macartney like some sort of “vaccine queen”.
    The surly Minister, whose body language seemed to indicate disgust at having to be cross-examined by a mere One Nation senator, hand-balled the question to the Chief Medical Officer Professor Paul Kelly who took the question on notice, like most other questions.
    Please continue to read full article >

    In 2017 a former vice president of Pfizer blew the whistle and said that pharmaceutical companies intentionally design vaccines to keep the public in a state of illness to profit from the treatments of vaccine-induced illnesses.
    Pfizer’s acquisitions of other pharmaceutical companies since the rollout of its covid vaccine seem to indicate this is indeed the case.
    In 2021, Pfizer’s acquisition of Arena Pharmaceuticals raised eyebrows. The purchase price seemed disproportionate to the market size of the drug they acquired – a drug that is a potential therapy for all kinds of immuno-inflammatory diseases, including inflammation of the heart. As we know, myocarditis began to skyrocket after the rollout of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines.
    In 2023, Pfizer purchased Seagen Pharmaceuticals, known for its cancer drugs. Was this because of the connection between the mRNA injections and “turbo cancers”?
    In 2022, Pfizer purchased Global Blood Therapeutics for its drug to treat sickle cell disease, again for an amount that seemed disproportionate to the profit the company could make off the drug considering how many people have the disease. Does Pfizer know something we don’t? Will we see a blood cell disease epidemic as well?
    Pfizer’s New Heart Pandemic >
    By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny >
    Please continue to read full article >

    ‘Key to Revolving Door’: FDA Tells Staff Who Leave for Pharma Jobs They Can Work ‘Behind the Scenes’ to Influence Agency
    According to an internal email obtained by The BMJ, the FDA told a departing staffer who had reviewed COVID-19 vaccines while working at the FDA and who later accepted a job at Moderna that he could still work “behind the scenes” to influence agency decision-making.
    by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
    JULY 3, 2024
    Please continue to read full article >

    In 1981 FDA approved Aspartame – Aspartame is ‘Artificial Sweetener’ aka ‘Chemical Sweetener’
    Aspartame’s founder, GD Searle, really didn’t think aspartame would be approved because of the cancer concerns, but after two FDA denials and a ban placed on aspartame, Searle packed the FDA with their corporate goons, and they finally slipped through aspartame’s approval in 1981.
    The FDA Denied Aspartame’s Approval And Then Banned It
    FDA approvals don’t mean much for consumer safety anymore. They used to do their job (or at least they tried to), but they have a history of shoddy safety approvals.
    FDA officials tried to do what was right in the 1970s when GD Searle Pharmaceuticals applied for FDA approval for aspartame after they saw the studies showing cancerous tumors, fetal deformities, and seizures, but they eventually gave in to the pressure from Big Pharma.
    Aspartame’s founder, GD Searle, really didn’t think aspartame would be approved because of the cancer concerns, but after two FDA denials and a ban placed on aspartame, Searle packed the FDA with their corporate goons, and they finally slipped through aspartame’s approval in 1981.
    It was a rocky 10-years for a product that never should have been approved for the public market.
    What Happened ?

    The FDA, following cursory assessment of its safety and toxicity approved Aspartame in 1981 – Aspartame and cancer – new evidence for causation
    Environ Health. 2021; 20: 42.
    Published online 2021 Apr 12. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00725-y
    PMCID: PMC8042911
    PMID: 33845854
    Philip J. Landrigan 1,2,3 and Kurt Straif4,5
    Aspartame is one of the world’s most widely used artificial sweeteners and is an ingredient in more than 5000 food products globally. A particularly important use is in low-calorie beverages consumed by children and pregnant women.
    The Ramazzini Institute (RI) reported in 2006 and 2007 that aspartame causes dose-related increases in malignant tumors in multiple organs in rats and mice. Increased cancer risk was seen even at low exposure levels approaching the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI). Prenatal exposures caused increased malignancies in rodent offspring at lower doses than in adults.
    These findings generated intense controversy focused on the accuracy of RI’s diagnoses of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissue tumors (HLTs). Critics made the claim that pulmonary lesions observed in aspartame-exposed animals were inflammatory lesions caused by Mycoplasma infection rather than malignant neoplasms.

    This Artificial Sweetener Is More Damaging to Human Health Than Aspartame
    Neotame, an artificial sweetener that’s chemically similar to aspartame, may seriously damage the human intestine and overall gut health. Not only does it cause cell death in intestinal cells but it also damages bacteria commonly found in the gut.
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    JUNE 27, 2024
    Story at a glance:
    Neotame, an artificial sweetener that’s chemically similar to aspartame, may seriously damage the human intestine and overall gut health.
    Not only did neotame cause cell death in intestinal cells but it also damaged bacteria commonly found in the gut.
    Neotame causes healthy gut bacteria to become diseased and invade the gut wall, which could lead to irritable bowel syndrome and sepsis.
    Previous research by the scientists found that other artificial sweeteners, including saccharin, sucralose and aspartame, may similarly harm the gut.
    Artificial sweeteners are also linked to additional health risks, including increased risk of Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, anxiety and mortality in adults.
    Neotame, an artificial sweetener that’s chemically similar to aspartame, may seriously damage the human intestine and overall gut health.
    Sometimes listed on food ingredient labels as E961, neotame is a relative newcomer to the artificial sweetener market, and despite well-known health concerns, is expected to reach a global market value of $3 billion by the end of 2025.
    Neotame, developed in 2002 as an alternative to aspartame, is up to 13,000 times sweeter than sugar and is widely used in drinks, sauces, sweets, savory foods and chewing gum.
    Yet, “Despite widespread global use of neotame, there are surprisingly few research studies on the biological and physiological effects of the sweetener,” researchers wrote in Frontiers in Nutrition.
    The team, from Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, England, found neotame poses serious risks to gut health, including causing healthy gut bacteria to become diseased.
    Neotame may damage gut microbes, leading to irritable bowel syndrome and sepsis.
    Please continue to read full article >

    From 2014
    The International Medical Council on Vaccination
    is an association of medical doctors, registered nurses and other qualified medical professionals whose purpose is to counter the messages asserted by pharmaceutical companies, the government and medical agencies that vaccines are safe, effective and harmless.
    Our conclusions have been reached individually by each member of the Council, after thousands of hours of personal research, study and observation.
    Principles and Findings
    We are profoundly critical of the practice of vaccination.
    Vaccination is an unacceptable risk to every member of society, regardless of age.
    As medical professionals, Council members have observed first-hand the health of vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated. We find the latter group to be robust, healthy and drug-free compared to the former group.
    We have reviewed published studies in support of vaccines and have found them wanting in both substance and science.
    We have brought out into the open hundreds of peer-reviewed, published medical articles that document the damage and the diseases caused by vaccines.
    We find the premise of herd immunity to be a faulty theory.
    We encourage intelligent debate about vaccination.
    We expect individuals to take responsibility for their health and the health of their children by investigating the problems due to vaccination prior to subjecting their children, or themselves, to this medical procedure.
    We believe that refusing vaccination is a personal right that should be legislatively guaranteed.

    March 11, 2020, Biggest Lie in World History: There Never Was A Pandemic. The Data Base is Flawed. The Covid Mandates including the Vaccine are Invalid
    The PCR \”Covid-19 Confirmed Cases\” are Meaningless. The Multibillion Dollar Antigen and Home Test Project is Fake
    by Professor Michel Chossudovsky – Global Research, April 15, 2024
    March 11, 2024: Four Years Ago the Covid-19 Lockdown was imposed in one fell swoop by national governments Worldwide.
    The Lockdown implied: “Confining the Labour Force” and “Freezing the Work Place”.
    Not a single economist has acknowledged this relationship. From their standpoint, it was the virus which triggered economic and social collapse. What nonsense.
    What does this imply. The most serious economic and social crisis in World history which four years later is still ongoing, leading to economic chaos and mass poverty Worldwide.
    Destabilizing the social, political and economic structure of 190 sovereign countries cannot constitute a “solution” to combating the virus.
    But that was the imposed “solution” which was implemented in several stages from the very outset of the corona crisis in January 2020.
    It’s the destruction of people’s lives. It is the destabilization of civil society.
    Fake science was supportive of this devastating agenda. The lies were sustained by a massive media disinformation campaign. 24/7, Incessant and Repetitive “Covid alerts” in the course of the last four years.
    The historic March 11, 2020 lockdown triggered economic and social chaos Worldwide. It was an act of “economic warfare”: a war against humanity.
    This diabolical agenda has undermined the sovereignty of nation states.
    It has contributed to a wave of bankruptcies. It has impoverished people Worldwide.
    It has led to a spiralling dollar denominated global debt.
    The powerful structures of global capitalism, Big Money coupled with its intelligence and military apparatus were the driving force.
    Using advanced digital and communications technologies, the lockdown and “closure” of the global economy is unprecedented in World history.
    The video below was produced by Global Research in December 2020 prior to the launching of the vaccine. It was released in early 2021.
    It was the object of immediate censorship. It was taken down.
    Thanks to Vaccine Choice Canada, this version on Rumble was saved.
    Please watch video – Start the video production at 6′.30′
    VIDEO >
    Professor Michel Chossudovsky – Articles Archive

    Who committed this crime against humanity?
    JAN 06, 2024
    In a recent substack article,
    This is a succinct summary of the Covid debacle…
    So who was behind this? Who are the actors who facilitated ‘Covid’ stealing the peoples’ personal autonomy and bodily integrity via the imposition of restrictions/lockdowns, testing, masking/muzzling, vaccines, and surveillance?
    We need to build a list of those who were complicit in the betrayal of the people, complicit in the theft of freedom.
    For instance, Greg Hunt, who was Australia’s Health Minister during the bulk of the ‘Covid’ scam.
    Prior to entering the Australian Parliament in 2001, Greg Hunt was the Director of Global Strategy of the World Economic Forum 2000-2001 – responsible for the development of global strategy for the WEF, working directly to the CEO, and during 1999-2001 he was Engagement Manager – McKinsey & Co, providing specialist advice in telecommunications, start-ups, government reform and the banking sector.
    How many other WEF associates such as Hunt ‘penetrated zee cabinets’ around the world, after which we ended up with a fake pandemic to install totalitarianism?
    During ‘Covid’ I sought accountability from Greg Hunt, requesting the definition of the \’emergency\’ in Australia constraining the entire country, and requesting access to the advice being provided by medical and scientific experts about this \’emergency\’, and the evidence supporting this advice, and also requesting transparency for the people providing medical and scientific advice to the then Morrison and State governments – see my email to Greg Hunt dated 23 July 2021, also copied below.
    No response received from Hunt…no accountability.
    Please read full article >

    The Government’s Pandemic Preparedness Operation Looks a Lot Like Arsonists Running the Fire Department
    If the government’s fear-driven, deception-based “pandemic preparedness” operation isn’t stopped, the COVID-19 experience will be converted from a once-in-a-lifetime trauma to a recurring man-made disaster.
    by Brownstone Institute
    JULY 2, 2024
    By Clayton J. Baker, M.D., and Brian Hooker, Ph.D.
    Originally published by Brownstone Institute. >
    Clayton J. Baker, M.D., is an internal medicine physician with a quarter century in clinical practice.
    He has held numerous academic medical appointments, and his work has appeared in many journals, including the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine.
    From 2012 to 2018 he was Clinical Associate Professor of Medical Humanities and Bioethics at the University of Rochester.
    Brian Hooker, Ph.D., is chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense and professor emeritus of biology at Simpson University in Redding, California.
    Please continue to read full article >

    A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © Crazz Files | Newsphere by AF themes.