Turnbull Pushes Mandatory Vaccination Rollout But Has Lucrative shares In Big Pharma
Gardasil 9 trial was sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., the maker of Gardasil and Gardasil 9. Turnbull has direct shares in Merck & i smell another rat.
Malcolm’s Message To Australian Families is, Vaccinate Vaccinate Vaccinate $$$$$$$.
Our No Jab, No Pay policy has seen vaccination rates improving rapidly. Ensuring Australia has a herd immunity will keep children and communities safe that’s why we’re aiming for 95% of children to be immunised.
Families currently receiving Child Care Benefit and Child Care Rebate have just over a week left to get their child’s immunisations on track by 18 March 2016 to avoid the risk of losing child care payments.
Malcolm Turnbull has shares in pharmaceutical companies and cigarette maker British American Tobacco.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who has been controversially targeted by Labor over his extensive offshore investments, has updated his pecuniary interests to include a European investment fund that holds shares in pharmaceutical companies and cigarette maker British American Tobacco.
The Australian newspaper reported this week that two of Mr Turnbull’s other investment funds hold shares in Japan Tobacco, maker of Camel cigarettes. Mr Turnbull’s office declined to comment but anti-tobacco campaigner Simon Chapman said it was difficult to know exactly where funds invest their money but said he would expect Mr Turnbull might consider “pulling out” of those particular funds. Read More: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/malcolm-turnbull-urged-to-dump-investments-in-tobacco-companies-20151022-gkfinl.html
What’s on Malcolm Turnbull’s Register of Interests?
First, there are the listed companies and funds*. Among them is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust [NYSEARCA:SPY]. Over the last two years, SPY is up by nearly 40%. This ETF is relatively popular because it offers exposure to big-name stocks, whilst being balanced and accessible. The Trust’s top 
ten holdings are Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Exxon Mobil, Johnson & Johnson, GE, Wells Fargo, Berkshire Hathaway (Class B), JPMorgan, Amazon.com, and (Pfizer Inc). Apple is the most substantial holding, at 3.8%. To put that in context, Microsoft comes next at 2.03%. So it’s very tech heavy. But perhaps not as tech heavy as Vanguard Information Technology ETF [NYSEARCA:VGT], which Turnbull bought in July last year. VGT’s top five holdings are Apple, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and IBM. http://www.moneymorning.com.au/20150915/where-does-new-pm-malcolm-turnbull-invest-his-money-cw.html
Lucy Turnbull sticks with Prima BioMed:
Lucy Turnbull will remain Chair of Australian biotechnology company Prima BioMed.
Prima BioMed is a clinical stage immuno-oncology company, currently in product collaborations with Novartis and GSK.
Ms Turnbull said she would reassess her corporate commitments following her husband’s elevation to the prime ministership in September.
She has subsequently stood down as deputy chairman of Australia’s largest private ferry operator, SeaLink Travel Group, but was yesterday re-elected Chair of Prima Biomed at its Annual General Meeting yesterday.
“The Board is delighted that Lucy is standing for re-election,” said Non-Executive Director Russell Howard. “Despite her considerable new responsibilities, she remains committed to development of Prima’s immunotherapy products for the benefit of cancer patients, as well as Prima shareholders. Lucy has made a highly valued contribution to the Board over the past 5 years. We have her ongoing support and counsel going forward.” http://biotechdispatch.com.au/lucy-turnbull-sticks-with-prima-biomed/#sthash.m4LC4oOI.dpbs
Among the more unusual investments detailed by the register were the Minister’s positions in ETFs based on the commodities platinum and palladium, and his wife’s keen interest in pharmaceutical companies. http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/11/why-is-lucy-turnbull-dodging-australian-equities/
Tax avoidance inquiry calls on nine ‘big pharma’ bosses to explain tax contribution
The bosses of nine of Australia’s largest multinational pharmaceutical companies will appear in front of a Senate committee investigating corporate tax avoidance.
Representatives from Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Merck Sharp & Dohne have all been requested to appear at public hearings on July 1.
The next phase of the tax avoidance inquiry comes months after the headline-grabbing appearance of executives from Google, Apple and Microsoft who struggled to explain why those companies pay so little tax in Australia.
The move on “big pharma” came after Australian Tax Commissioner Chris Jordan told a Senate estimates hearing this month that at least four large drug makers are being audited by the tax office. “Clearly there are [ATO] investigations happening in that industry,” he said.
Mr Jordan, who has said that the pharmaceutical industry displays “some of the attributes of the tech industry”, said the importation of drugs manufactured overseas and the payment of royalties for the intellectual property behind them made tax minimisation possible for the industry.
It also comes after Fairfax Media revealed that the five biggest suppliers of publicly subsidised medicines in Australia recorded sales of nearly $5 billion last year but paid an average of just $10 million each in company tax.
Research by the Parliamentary Library disclosed the tax contribution of multinational pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer and AstraZeneca, makers of common cholesterol drugs Lipitor and Crestor, respectively.
It found Pfizer and Sanofi-Aventis both reported losses in Australia in 2014. Those companies received a combined $1.1 billion from the taxpayer for supplying medicines through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
In total, the top five pharmaceutical suppliers to the PBS received $2.8 billion in public money. Their total Australian sales were $4.8 billion. But the research found their combined profits were a slim $50 million. They paid $53 million in tax between them – or roughly 1¢ in tax for every dollar earned in Australia. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/tax-avoidance-inquiry-calls-on-nine-big-pharma-bosses-to-explain-tax-contribution-20150619-ghrzw6.html
Harvard Trained Immunologist Demolishes California Legislation That Terminates Vaccine Exemptions
The following open letter by a PhD Immunologist completely demolishes the current California legislative initiative to remove all vaccine exemptions. That such a draconian and cynical state statute is under consideration in the ‘Golden State’ is as shocking as it is predictable. After all, it was mysteriously written and submitted shortly after the manufactured-in-Disneyland measles ‘outbreak’.
The indisputable science that is employed by Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD ought to be read by every CA legislator who is entertaining an affirmative vote for SB277. Dr. Obukhanych skillfully deconstructs the many false and fabricated arguments that are advanced by Big Pharma and the U.S Federal Government as they attempt to implement a nationwide Super-Vaccination agenda.
When the California Senate refuses to consider authoritative scientific evidence which categorically proves the dangerous vaccine side effects on the schoolchildren, something is very wrong. Such conduct by the Senate constitutes criminal action that endangers the lives and welfare of children. Their official behavior must be acknowledged for what it is — CRIMINAL — and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
An Open Letter to Legislators Currently Considering Vaccine Legislation from Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD in Immunology
Re: VACCINE LEGISLATION
Dear Legislator:
My name is Tetyana Obukhanych. I hold a PhD in Immunology. I am writing this letter in the hope that it will correct several common misperceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings.
Do unvaccinated children pose a higher threat to the public than the vaccinated?
It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide. You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern vaccines – and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children – is not consistent with such a statement. I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases. People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public school setting may not be warranted.
- IPV (inactivated poliovirus vaccine) cannot prevent transmission of poliovirus (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #1). Wild poliovirus has been non-existent in the USA for at least two decades. Even if wild poliovirus were to be re-imported by travel, vaccinating for polio with IPV cannot affect the safety of public spaces. Please note that wild poliovirus eradication is attributed to the use of a different vaccine, OPV or oral poliovirus vaccine. Despite being capable of preventing wild poliovirus transmission, use of OPV was phased out long ago in the USA and replaced with IPV due to safety concerns.
- Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C. tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is intended to render personal protection only.
- While intended to prevent the disease-causing effects of the diphtheria toxin,the diphtheria toxoid vaccine (also contained in the DTaP vaccine) is not designed to prevent colonization and transmission of C. diphtheriae. Vaccinating for diphtheria cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is likewise intended for personal protection only.
- The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA, replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable of preventing colonization and transmission of B. pertussis (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #2). The FDA has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.[1]
- Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters (see appendix for the CDC document, Item #3), meaning that people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.
- Among numerous types of H. influenzae, the Hib vaccine covers only type b. Despite its sole intention to reduce symptomatic and asymptomatic (disease-less) Hib carriage, the introduction of the Hib vaccine has inadvertently shifted strain dominance towards other types of H. influenzae(types a through f).These types have been causing invasive disease of high severity and increasing incidence in adults in the era of Hib vaccination of children (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #4). The general population is more vulnerable to the invasive disease now than it was prior to the start of the Hib vaccination campaign. Discriminating against children who are not vaccinated for Hib does not make any scientific sense in the era of non-type b H. influenzae disease.
- Hepatitis B is a blood-borne virus. It does not spread in a community setting, especially among children who are unlikely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as needle sharing or sex. Vaccinating children for hepatitis B cannot significantly alter the safety of public spaces. Further, school admission is not prohibited for children who are chronic hepatitis B carriers. To prohibit school admission for those who are simply unvaccinated – and do not even carry hepatitis B – would constitute unreasonable and illogical discrimination.
In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is. No discrimination is warranted.
How often do serious vaccine adverse events happen?
It is often stated that vaccination rarely leads to serious adverse events. Unfortunately, this statement is not supported by science. A recent study done in Ontario, Canada, established thatvaccination actually leads to an emergency room visit for 1 in 168 children following their 12-month vaccination appointment and for 1 in 730 children following their 18-month vaccination appointment (see appendix for a scientific study, Item #5).
When the risk of an adverse event requiring an ER visit after well-baby vaccinations is demonstrably so high, vaccination must remain a choice for parents, who may understandably be unwilling to assume this immediate risk in order to protect their children from diseases that are generally considered mild or that their children may never be exposed to.
Can discrimination against families who oppose vaccines for reasons of conscience prevent future disease outbreaks of communicable viral diseases, such as measles?
Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the “measles paradox.” I quote from the article by Poland & Jacobson (1994) “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.” Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:
“THE APPARENT PARADOX IS THAT AS MEASLES IMMUNIZATION RATES RISE TO HIGH LEVELS IN A POPULATION, MEASLES BECOMES A DISEASE OF IMMUNIZED PERSONS.”[2]
Further research determined that behind the “measles paradox” is a fraction of the population called LOW VACCINE RESPONDERS. Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine. These individuals then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of “susceptibles’’ within 2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated.[3]
Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait.[4] The proportion of low-responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA.[5]
Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%, see appendix for scientific studies, Items #6&7). This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time. Vaccine immunity does not equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.
It has been documented that vaccinated persons who develop breakthrough measles are contagious. In fact, two major measles outbreaks in 2011 (in Quebec, Canada, and in New York, NY) were re-imported by previously vaccinated individuals.[6] – [7]
Taken together, these data make it apparent that elimination of vaccine exemptions, currently only utilized by a small percentage of families anyway, will neither solve the problem of disease resurgence nor prevent re-importation and outbreaks of previously eliminated diseases.
Is discrimination against conscientious vaccine objectors the only practical solution?
The majority of measles cases in recent US outbreaks (including the recent Disneyland outbreak) are adults and very young babies, whereas in the pre-vaccination era, measles occurred mainly between the ages 1 and 15. Natural exposure to measles was followed by lifelong immunity from re-infection, whereas vaccine immunity wanes over time, leaving adults unprotected by their childhood shots. Measles is more dangerous for infants and for adults than for school-aged children.
Despite high chances of exposure in the pre-vaccination era, measles practically never happened in babies much younger than one year of age due to the robust maternal immunity transfer mechanism. The vulnerability of very young babies to measles today is the direct outcome of the prolonged mass vaccination campaign of the past, during which their mothers, themselves vaccinated in their childhood, were not able to experience measles naturally at a safe school age and establish the lifelong immunity that would also be transferred to their babies and protect them from measles for the first year of life.
Luckily, a therapeutic backup exists to mimic now-eroded maternal immunity. Infants as well as other vulnerable or immunocompromised individuals, are eligible to receive immunoglobulin, a potentially life-saving measure that supplies antibodies directed against the virus to prevent or ameliorate disease upon exposure (see appendix, Item #8).
In summary: 1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals pose no greater risk of transmission of polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-vaccinated individuals pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is not transmissible at all; 2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits after childhood vaccination appointments attesting that vaccination is not risk-free; 3) outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had nearly perfect vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral diseases in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is available for those who may be exposed to these diseases.
Taken together, these four facts make it clear that discrimination in a public school setting against children who are not vaccinated for reasons of conscience is completely unwarranted as the vaccine status of conscientious objectors poses no undue public health risk.
Sincerely Yours,
~ Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD
Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD, is the author of the book Vaccine Illusion. She has studied immunology in some of the world’s most prestigious medical institutions. She earned her PhD in Immunology at the Rockefeller University in New York and did postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Stanford University in California.
Dr. Obukhanych offers online classes for those who want to gain deeper understanding of how the immune system works and whether the immunologic benefits of vaccines are worth the risks: Natural Immunity Fundamentals.
word is – Malcolm Is Broker Than Broke – owing millions – desperation will allow you to sacrifice anything.
I have not read this article yet – I am busy else where at this moment – I want to ask if you have watched the video – youtube – Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were The Germans So Stupid?
15:30 minutes into the video – Unwilling Martyrs – I saw it on Aletho News first.
I can’t see how Malcolm the jewish banker is Broke ? But yes I have seen stacks of good videos like the one you mention here, Unfortunately for me, and it seems Australia some of us are years ahead with our knowledge, but so far all we get is rejection of our truth, That is that of course Judea Declared war on Germany on the 24th March 1933, despite Hitler’s plea’s for no wars ,Churchill said ” we’ll give him his war whether he likes it or not “.
Clearly there is irrefutable proof that not a single person died in a German Camp during or after ww2, and it’s also obvious that we fought the Wrong enemy ,Just as George blood and guts Patton said ” We defeated the wrong enemy ” and we know he had an unfortunate car accident just shorty before he was due to return home and quit the Army so he wouldn’t be censored ,and then he was going to expose what really happened ,including the rape of every woman from 8 to eighty ,by the allied troops and the Russians ,as per the Bolshevik Revolution.
The whole world has been hood winked hog tied and played for a sucker fool ! by those traitors of society the Freemasons / and Zionists .My Uncle was a National Hero before he even left Australia as Back ups for the Anzacs after the Set up landing ,he walked 28 days,from Gilgandra to Sydney to then go and face a blood bath that’s why im here to expose evil,to expose the synagogue of evil ,so as humanity can free itself from the chains and locks that they hold the keys too, but are that simple, dumbed down, arrogant,ignorant and stupid that they don’t even know ,that they don’t know whats happening.
If Turnbull has ANY SHARES in big Pharma no matter how distant – it is a conflict of interest & a no, no, unless he wants TROUBLE – even prompting the competitions product is “helping yourself” & very tricky
Some one need to reminde / fill in, this old guy LOUD & CLEAR as to the legality of pushing for ones own benefit.
His register of interests shows a long list of shares in almost 30 companies including BHP, Volkswagen and the Australia-based minerals company Forte Energy.now BOSGLOBAL.
* Sounds great considering the global auto industry is shrinking by the minute ..
* Oil reserves are running out globally .. fracking is a sign of desperation & only yields limited raw product .. at massive expense .. then runs out ..
* No one has money to buy minerals in this desperately depleted global economy.
Business .. working to the model that the population of planet earth will explode at 9.000.000.000 & growth is the only way forward to survive .. have over produced / over manufactured / enough that you will be buying a car in 50 years that was made today.
Everyone is in denial .. & even though they know the truth .. they are bluffing for all they are worth .. shares that do not yield & have little prospect of yielding are worthless mate.
SHAMEFUL and DISGRACEFUL
def conflict of interest
He should either cash in the investment and cut ties with his big pharma involvement inc his wife
Or Step down
He is clearly supporting legislation which will enrich him to the detriment of the citizens
That is untenable
I agree with you 100% & especially if he is broke ..
Imagine how the temptation impedes his judgement ..
The Hydro Electrics Scheme expansion .. WHO IS GOING TO BUILD IT FOR US .. where exactly is/are the money & the jobs going to .. probably to some nation that Australia owes BILLIONS TO .. & that is most likely why Our Malcolm is having it built & not because we need it .. we really need to wack some more solar panels on houses with enough capacity to feed substantial electricity into the grid.
FIRST TRY THAT MALCOLM .. you never know dude .. it might just work.
Does he still have shares in both the big pharma and tobacco industry as of Feb 2017? And is his wife still CEO of a Pharmaceutical Manufacturer???
Cant stand him he is vaccinating, geo engineering and destroying us as people.
Time to stand up to this tyrant and kick him out.
He giggled the last election & that is the only reason he is in .. Our Malcolm chose mid-winter . who runs an election on the coldest day of the year .. wink wink say no more .. hey.
Hey ma, we got visitors come on board !
Fracking is desperation .. Kelvin Thomson MP spoke out about suggesting that Australian gas reserves should be redirected to Australian use & not just sent overseas.
Some hotshot gave a talk at the National Press Club Address ad recommended the very same thing .. I emailed Mr. Thomson’s office, complimented him on his sanity & told them that he had support in high places.
Nothing changed however.
Sorry I hit the send button before I finished checking what I wrote ,I obviously meant that not a single person died in any so called gas Chamber at any camp in Germany and that its been proven long ago, by jews and others, but people are to gutless to admit they have been lied to all their life and 10 generations before us ,they cant admit they were wrong and have been Had Bigtime everything about His-story is a lie and blatant at that .
Great Video Benjamin Freedman Speech 1960 an Ex Zionist Jew,… there still are some good guys always ! and what about JFK Secret societies speech ,you know the one they killed him for along with printing His own money again and numerous other reasons. Free Palestine free the world ! Israel Did 911 100% certain say’s Alan Sabrosky a Jew Who happened to be head of strategic Studies at a Military College in the Usa ah, so much truth to learn, so much power in knowledge to be had ,but no one wants it ,
Great site by the way hope you can put my comments up,..but thanks anyway regardless
Actually I forgot what the subject was about ,so here is my comment on it.
Mandatory Vaccines are a crime against Humanity, Malcolm is just another Kharzar,the Government is a total fraud anyway and has absolutely no LAWFUL Authority,as per SIR HARRY GIBBS quote they operate with ” NO BASIS IN LAW ” the vaccines themselves are a toxic nightmare and are responsible the massive rise in Autism Deaths and life long injuries associated with the after effects of Vaccines ,laced with Aluminium , Thimerisol,Formaldahyde,Aborted fetus cells,green monkey kidney cells ,not unlike the Rhesus monkey that they made the early Polio Vaccines out of prior to 1970 ,and not one person I know yet has known about the SV 40 virus that was given to people in this vaccine ,” Purposely”knowing full well it was a live but dorment cancer causing virus that had killed mice and given them all sorts of cancers, its passed on though your kids ,thus brain tumours in you toddlers ect ,and the sickest kids in the history of the world not to mention dumbed down with low iq’s . pretty sad hey ? 85 % of People have it have passed it on to their kids ,and they DONT EVEN KNOW IT ? You trust Malcolm ?