Ex-Pfizer VP Blows Whistle: ‘No Evidence’ Covid ‘Actually Exists’
Pfizer’s former vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory, Dr. Michael Yeadon, has blown the whistle to warn that there is “no evidence” that COVID-19 “actually exists.”
Yeadon joined a growing number of top scientists who are speaking out to assert there is no sufficient evidence that either the COVID-19 virus or any other virus exists.
As a result, there was never any evidence to support a pandemic during the Covid era.
Despite this, Yeadon says the Covid pandemic led to the killing of many with “a monstrous, long-planned attack on helpless civilians by coordinated, lethal, central planning.”
“Face it. The evidence is that our governments hate us and want us dead,” the retired executive said in a statement.
Yeadon spent over 30 years working for the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world.
He rose to the most senior research position in his field at Pfizer before resigning in 2011.
Yeadon left Pfizer to start his own biotech company, Ziarco, which he later sold to Novartis in 2017.
The British scientist is well-known for his acute criticism of the COVID-19 “supranational operation.”
Since the pandemic, he has been speaking out to warn the public that Covid mRNA injections are intended to “maim and kill deliberately.”
In a 2022 interview, Yeadon shared that as a result of conversations with fellow scientists.
The scientists came to the conclusion that virology itself was based on the unestablished premise that “viruses” actually exist.
And after significant personal research he eventually “realized over time” he could “no longer maintain” his “understanding of respiratory viruses.”
After obtaining further information, this “collapsed the possibility that respiratory viruses, as described, exist at all. They don’t,” he concluded.
In recent decades, some medical scientists have pointed out that “no particle has ever been sequenced, characterized, studied with valid controlled experiments and shown to fit the definition of a virus.”
Therefore, virology “has consistently failed to fulfill its own requirements to prove” viruses even exist.
Furthermore, Canadian researcher Christine Massey has made Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to hundreds of scientific institutions in 40 different countries.
The requests are “asking for any records of anyone in the world ever finding this alleged (SARS-CoV-2) virus in the bodily fluid or tissue or excrement of any people anywhere on earth by anyone ever.”
“To date, we have responses from 216 different institutions in 40 different countries,” she said.
“And so far, no one has been able to provide us with even one record.”
“They can’t cite any record,” she notes.
So they have all admitted that they don’t have a sample of the alleged virus and they don’t even know of anyone else who ever did obtain a sample of this alleged virus.”
Massey and her colleagues followed up to make similar FOIA requests seeking “any record of any alleged virus that supposedly infects humans being purified from a sick person.
“And they admitted that they didn’t have any whatsoever.”
Yeadon was asked by world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough to respond to a statement defending the dominant view that viruses have been demonstrated to exist.
He provided an extended reply seeking to offer readers further challenging arguments to consider for themselves.
In proposing one point in his reasoning, McCullough said:
“For those who are kind of denying the presence of the (COVID-19) virus, I think we’re approaching 300,000 peer-reviewed papers on the topic.
“I mean, this is a mountain of evidence to dismiss out of hand.”
Yeadon replied, proposing:
My initial concerns are mainly with the attempt to pretend that lots of papers asserting the same unproven thing bolsters the unproven claim. It simply doesn’t.
Back in the day when people thought the earth was stationary and the sun orbited earth, had there then been ‘peer reviewed papers’, all the reviewers would pass papers on earth centric systems.
The numbers don’t make it correct.
Merely that once group think sets in, almost everyone will interpret evidence in that light.
This continues until unequivocal evidence emerges to counter the errors of thinking.
Yeadon, a doctoral expert in respiratory pharmacology and a specialist in toxicology, argues that the Covid pandemic was a crime against humanity that should be viewed as an attack.
However, he warns that “the perpetrators are going to do it again.”
Source: https://slaynews.com/news/ex-pfizer-vp-blows-whistle-no-evidence-covid-actually-exists/
