‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation & pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Dr. Phillip R.N. Sutton, Formerly Academic Associate and Senior Research Fellow, Department Oral Medicine and Surgery, Dental School, University of Melbourne, Author of The Greatest Fraud: Fluoridation (1996):

“We are all affected by this potentially dangerous fraud: The convincing of Governments and people generally that it is ethical, safe and beneficial to medicate, compulsorily, many millions of people throughout their lives with small but uncontrollable doses of a cumulative and very toxic substance because of the notion that it reduces the prevalence of dental decay. All this, although neither its safety nor any scientifically-proved reduction in the number of decayed teeth has been demonstrated.”

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com/fia-report-archives/

~~

GLEN S. R. WALKER, F.I.M.F., E.M.E.C.S., M.A.E.S., was Chairman of the Freedom From Fluoridation Federation of Australia, and of the Anti-Fluoridation Association of Victoria (now Australia).

For thirty years Glen Walker was the inspiration behind The Australian Fluoridation News. An Australian Example of Fluoridation Dictatorship

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2011/AFN_2011N1_JanMar_AquaPura.pdf#page=5

2007 The Australian Fluoridation News – Is there a case of Government Fraud?

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2007/AFN_2007N4_JulAug_AquaPura.pdf

Australian Fluoridation News – Glen Walker – Extensive Information

home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/australian_fluoridation_newsletters_home.htm

~~

‘Fluoridation has not been shown to be safe and effective’

http://

Cities in Canada are also abandoning the practice. The most recent are cities like Quebec City, Waterloo, Calgary and Windsor. Those cities finally decided to stop wasting their money on toxic waste (fluoridation chemicals) that not only are no longer effective to prevent decay but are likely harmful to humans and the environment.

Dr. Hardy Limeback BSc PhD (Biochemistry) DDS Professor Emeritus and former Head, Preventive Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto

http://www.madhunt.com/hardy-limebeck-column-20130930.html

~~
Fluoride – The Battle of Darkness & Light by Mary Sparrowdancer

© 2003

14 Dec. 2003

It was due to my growing concerns about our country’s growing health problems as well as the erosion of our civil liberties that, in November of 2002, I published a paper focusing upon

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

both of these issues and spoke about them on several radio programs. The paper quietly made its way through Washington, D.C., and then around the world.
The paper detailed the “revolving door” in Washington, D.C., an apparent turnstile between private industries and the United States government. Through this invisible door, industry managers pass directly into the very agencies that govern industry – the government’s food, drug, agricultural and chemical regulatory departments – in order to influence regulations or speed the approval of their company’s products. The paper, “Let Them Eat Anything,” showed this unholy alliance, the conflict of interest that has contributed to a mounting epidemic of health problems in the United States. (1) Extensive information:

http://rense.com/general45/bll.htm

~~

ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE – Epidemic – Fluoride/Aluminium – By Doug Cross

In addition to the fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides (hazardous waste pollutants and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, etc., known as ‘fluoride’) they also add aluminium sulphate Australia already faces Alzheimer’s Disease (& Kidney disease) epidemics – STOP ‘WATER FLUORIDATION/Pollution’ immediately permanently & irrevocably for all time or face the ruin.

Dementia, including Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is fast becoming the greatest public health issue, ever. In the UK the Alzheimer’s Society recently stated that one in three persons over the age of 65 will die from AD – and it’s increasing so fast that in thirty years time the prevalence is expected to treble (do the maths and shiver!). Your children will live with fluorosis, but they will die with dementia.

Since the evidence that environmental exposure to ionic aluminium salts, such as the aluminium sulphate used in water treatment, is a leading cause of AD. There is a 50% and 150% increase in AD in areas where the water contains only half the permitted maximum of 0.2ppm. Fluoride in water – increases the speed at which it is absorbed and transferred to the brain. Adding Fluoride To Drinking Water Is Literally Insane. Fluoridation is bad on its own, but in the presence of aluminium its effects are becoming catastrophic as our ‘aluminium clocks’ tick away the countdown to Alzheimer’s – fluoride speeds up that lethal clock..

By Doug Cross UKCAF http://ukcaf.org/
CV http://www.intota.com/expert-consultant.asp?bioID=778541&perID=728108 ~~

Brief Extract:

One of the best-known chemical alterations produced by fluorides is a reduction in cholinesterases, including acetylcholinesterase. Fluorides also directly affect the actions of many of other important neurotransmitters in the brain. Fluorides seem to have a special attraction to acetylcholine. Nerve cells that synthesize this transmitter have numerous projections to many forebrain areas, including the neocortex and deeper areas of the brain that provide information to the neocortex. Not only do fluorides change the amount of the acetylcholine in the 7 brain, they selectively block certain receptors that respond to this transmitter. Fluoride reduces the number of one type of “nicotinic receptors” for acetylcholine. Some other nicotinic subtypes are not affected.10 Added to all of the other alterations in structure and function of the brain caused by fluorides, the opportunity for mental and behavioural changes are almost limitless. While the

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

cholinergic system of the brain has been most studied in regard to the effects of fluoride, it is not the only neural transmitter affected. It is likely that all neural transmitter systems are affected by fluoride intake, directly or indirectly. Other anomalies related to fluoride intake are found in many other chemical systems of the brain.

There is no known benefit of adding any form of fluoride to our drinking water. Who would want to increase chances of having a less than perfect child? Who would wish to take a chance on a possible reduction of their own mental capacity? Who would want to have their personality altered by fluoride induced alterations in their brain chemistry? Who would want to increase their odds of developing Alzheimer’s disease? Eliminating the addition of fluoride to our drinking water would remove these possibilities. The cost of doing this is zero. In fact it would enrich the communities now adding fluorides to their drinking water.

Robert L. Isaacson Department of Psychology and Center for Developmental and Behavioral NeuroscienceBinghamton University Binghamton, NY 13902-6000

~~

“Fluorides also increase the production of free radicals in the brain through several different biological pathways. These changes have a bearing on the possibility that fluorides act to increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.” http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php? record_id=11571&page=222

~~

Studies show there may be grave implications for Alzheimers, Dementia, Attention Deficit Disorder, reduced IQ in children and more – Neurotoxicity of Fluoride 1996 http://ffo- olf.org/neurological.html

~~
Editorial neurotoxic effects of fluoride 44(3)117–124 July-September 2011 Dr. Bruce Spittle

http://www.fluorideresearch.org/443/files/FJ2011_v44_n3_p00i-0vi_sfs.pdf

Harvard Study finds fluoride lowers IQ published in Federal Government Journal Published 15 August, 2012 http://www.fluorideaustralia.org/_img/Article000/art060_ehp.1104912.pdf

The International Society for Fluoride Research Inc.

www.fluorideresearch.org www.fluorideresearch.com www.fluorideresearch.net

Fluoride & aluminium in your water Brain & Kidney Damage http://www.frequencyrising.com/ water_filters_fluoride_aluminum.htm

Fluoride & The Brain – Fluorides Damage To The Brain http://www.fluoridealert.org/issues/health/ brain/

Fluoride health effects http://www.fluoridealert.org/issues/health/
OTHER DOCUMENTED ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS FROM FLUORIDE http:// www.fluoridation.com/adverse.htm

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Psychiatrist, Dr. Keith Ablow of Fox – TV’s Medical News Team says children with brain disorders should avoid fluoridated water http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/08/22/does-fluoride-in- drinking-water-hurt-your-brain/%23ixzz24K2CKJ5J

Fluoride & intelligence: the 36 studies – reduced IQ learning & memory impaired

http://www.fluoridealert.org/studies/brain01/
Health effects fluoride & the brain – http://www.fluoridealert.org/articles/science-watch01/

~~
Neurotoxicity of fluoride Dr. Phyllis Mullenix http://www.fluoridealert.org/content/mullenix-

interview/
and more http://www.fluoridealert.org/?s=neurotoxicity+of+fluoride+dr.+phyllis+mullenix

+

Link with silicofluoride/‘fluoridation chemicals” and violence and criminality:-

Neurotoxicity – Violence and Criminality click on that tab on this link >

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com/violencecriminality/

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com/violencecriminality/silicofluorides-water- fluoridation-chemicals/

~~

CAN C E R

London Ontario Canada CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON JANUARY 25, 2012

DRINKING WATER FLUORIDATION IN LONDON – Prof. Joe Cummins

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic and Teratogenic

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/Drinking%20Water%20Fluoridation%20%20is %20Genotoxic%20and%20Teratogenic.pdf

~~

“EPA has more than enough evidence to shut down fluoridation right now.” (Dr. Robert Carton)

“Fluoridation,” says former EPA senior scientist Robert J. Carton, PhD, “presents unacceptable risks to public health, and the government cannot prove its claims of safety. http:// www.doctoryourself.com/carton.html
~~

Dr. William Marcus, Ph.D, Environmental Protection Agency Scientist, Food & Water Journal, Summer 1998″Fluoride is a carcinogen by any standard we use. I believe EPA should

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

act immediately to protect the public, not just on the cancer data, but on the evidence of bone fractures, arthritis, mutagenicity, & other effects.” http://www.fluoridation.com/quotes.htm#JAMA,%201943,%20Editorial

~~

FLUORIDE CAUSES CANCER – “In point of fact, fluorine causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster, than any other chemical.” Dr. Dean Burk, PhD, former chief of cytochemistry at the U.S. National Cancer Institute for 30 years http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=ClqK7XvfLg0

~~

FLUORIDE CAUSES CANCER – Dr John Yiamouyiannis http:// www.youtube.com/watch?%20NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=SYxLRtudYM4 “Our studies show that cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, kidney, bladder, breast and ovaries are those primarily associated with fluoride intake”. John Yiamouyiannis PhD, Cancer Control Journal, Vol. 5, no’s1 + 2, p. 75.

~~

Fluoridegate – The Film http://www.fluoridegate.org/ USA EPA shredded evidence of harm and fired Chief Scientist/Toxicologist in an attempt to silence him. Also here > http://youtu.be/ zpw5fGt4UvI

~~

FLUORIDE’S LINK TO CANCER – DR. DAVID KENNEDY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um4baHtxsR4
FLUORIDE AND CANCER http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/cancer/index.aspx
FLUORIDE HEALTH EFECTS DATABASE http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/
FLUORIDE & CANCER http://slweb.org/bibliography.html click on CANCER link http:// slweb.org/bibliography.html#cancer
IRELAND – FLUORIDE IS CAUSING YOU HIGHER INCIDENCES OF PANCREATIC AND PROSTATE CANCER & MORE CASES OF LEUKAEMIA.
Source: http://www.oneworldchronicle.com/?p=5402
Cancer – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHPUrIz3xkE&feature=youtu.be
~~

THE STRONG EVIDENCE AGAINST THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE PRACTICE OF FLUORIDATING PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES CONTINUES TO BE IGNORED BY THOSE CHARGED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC HEALTH MEASURES.

The disingenuous actions of some scientist advocates of fluoridation and the general antipathy of science journals toward open examination of the subject raises serious questions regarding the objectivity constantly proclaimed for science.
Perhaps the weight of evidence cited by proponents refers to the physical weight of the endorsements and not to a preponderance of scientific evidence.

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

* Reprinted with permission, from American Laboratory, volume 12, number 9, page 10, 1980 by International Scientific Communications, Inc.

Full document: http://www.rethinkingcancer.org/resources/magazine-articles/6_3-4/ fluoridation.php

~~

Suppression of data documenting fluoride’s adverse health effects and lack of benefit is wide- spread

Scientists and professionals have been persecuted, censorsed, or harassed when they oppose water fluoridation. Unfortunately, fluoride toxicity has been a “faut pas” for many years, and anybody discussing this topic would be suspected to belong to the antifluoridation movement. Thus, the recently published Environmental Health Criteria 36 on Fluorine and Fluorides (WHO, 1989) only superficially discusses chronic toxicity, while beneficial effects and safety margins are dealt with in detail. As Temporary Adviser I was present at most of the Task Group meeting when the document was finalized. In accordance with the official fluoridation policy, information which could cast any doubt on the advantage of fluoride supplements was left out by the Task Group. Unless 1 had been present myself, I would have found it hard to believe. Thus, I am pleased that you have taken a personal interest in the problems of chronic fluoride toxicity.

Philippe Granjean, M.D. – Professor
Full Information: http://fluoridation.com/censor.htm ~~

Dennis Stevenson, a former Parliamentarian and Member of the ACT Legislative Assembly ‘Fluoridation Inquiry’ (1989-91). The majority of inquiry members would not report the scientific, medical, dental and court evidence received in worldwide submissions proving that fluoridation causes disease, deaths, tooth decay and is useless and environmentally destructive. Dennis put this evidence in a 177 page Dissenting Report, part of this major government report, but longer than the 131 page section which attempted to suppress the evidence.

For over 100 years, science and medicine have understood the poisonous nature of fluoride. In the 1930’s and 40’s, giant US companies, e.g. ALCOA, were sued for millions of dollars due to toxic fluoride waste escaping from factory smokestacks killing crops and livestock. ALCOA’s owners (Mellon) figured that if people could be persuaded fluoride isn’t poisonous but is good for teeth, profits could be protected. So, to introduce water fluoridation, they hired the brilliant ‘father of propaganda’ Edward L. Bernays. Joined later by other fluoride polluting industries (e.g. nuclear) and the multi-billion dollar sugar, toothpaste, confectionary and soft drink industries, they became strong financial supporters of dental associations that promoted fluoridation. One such support group, the Dental Health Education & Research Foundation (DHERF) was founded in Australia in 1962. Its Governors, Members and donors comprised key representatives from Coca-Cola, CSR, Kelloggs, Colgate-Palmolive, Wrigleys, Arnotts, Scanlens, Cadbury Schweppes, etc.

The following 12 points require no expertise in fluoride toxicity, just common sense:….

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/33574

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

~~

1997 Auckland New Zealand, Chief Dental Officer Dr. John Colquhoun

Concerning the oft-repeated observation that fluoridation has enjoyed overwhelming scientific endorsement, one should remember that even strongly supported theories have eventually been revised or replaced. From the outset, distinguished and reputable scientists opposed fluoridation, in spite of considerable intimidation and pressure [68, 69].

Most of the world has rejected fluoridation. Only America where it originated, and countries under strong American influence persist in the practice. Denmark banned fluoridation when its National Agency for Environmental Protection, after consulting the widest possible range of scientific sources, pointed out that the long-term effects of low fluoride intakes on certain groups in the population (for example, persons with reduced kidney function), were insufficiently known [70]. Sweden also rejected fluoridation on the recommendation of a special Fluoride Commission, which included among its reasons that: “The combined and long-term environmental effects of fluoride are insufficiently known” [71]. Holland banned fluoridation after a group of medical practitioners presented evidence that it caused reversible neuromuscular and gastrointestinal harm to some individuals in the population [72].

Environmental scientists, as well as many others, tend to doubt fluoridation. In the United States, scientists employed by the Environmental Protection Agency have publicly disavowed support for their employer’s pro-fluoridation policies [73]. The orthodox medical establishment, rather weak or even ignorant on environmental issues, persist in their support, as do most dentists, who tend to be almost fanatical about the subject. In English- speaking countries, unfortunately, the medical profession and its allied pharmaceutical lobby (the people who sell fluoride) seem to have more political influence than environmentalists.

Learn more: http://www.fluoridation.com/colquhoun.htm ~~

FLUORIDE FATIGUE Revised 4th printing
FLUORIDE POISONING: is fluoride in your drinking water – and from other sources – making you sick?
BRUCE SPITTLE Forewards by Professors Albert W. Burgstahler and A.K. Susheelahttp://www.pauapress.com/fluoride/files/1418.pdf

~~

Presentation to the SPC for Utilities and the Environment City of Calgary Council Chambers

Wednesday January 26, 2011
Submitted by: Dr. James Beck, MD, Ph.D.
Some of you on the committee have heard me before on fluoridation. I have in the past focused on the questions of effectiveness in preventing cavities and on the adverse effects of fluoride and of hexafluorosalicic acid. I have given reasons, based on peer-reviewed research papers published in credible journals, for concluding that fluoridation is at best minimally effective and definitely harmful to subgroups of the population and possibly harmful to all of us. So in these few minutes I will comment only on the ethical issue.

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

In 1957 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that fluoridation is “compulsory preventive medication”. The court’s ruling is significant because it legitimizes the common-sense conclusion that we are being medicated and it puts the matter clearly in the realm of medical ethics. Medical ethics in turn is embedded in human rights.

Here is how fluoridation violates the code of medical ethics. It is administration of a drug without control of dosage (controlling concentration in our water is not controlling dose or dosage). It is administration of a drug without informed consent of the recipient. It does not provide monitoring of the effects on the recipient. It is not possible for the recipient to stop receiving the drug (many can not get nonfluoridated water and none of us can avoid exposure from foods and drinks processed where tap water is fluoridated). The drug has not been shown to be safe for human consumption.

Fluoridation of a public water supply is not only an ethical offense against us all, it is clearly a more serious offense against those subgroups of our population which are particularly at risk of harm from fluoride. These groups include infants being fed with formula reconstituted with tap water, diabetics, persons deficient in iodine intake, persons with kidney disease, boys during the eight- year-old’s growth spurt, and others. It is an obligation of city councils and of Alberta Health Services to protect all, not just the average or just the majority.

Several councilors have rightly been concerned about the dental health of children of low-income families. It is said that fluoridation is of particular benefit to poor children. That has been investigated. It is found that the fluoridated poor groups have no better cavity experience than do the nonfluoridated poor groups. Furthermore, it is found that the prevalence of cavities increases as family income decreases. It’s not fluoride that would benefit poor children; it’s a higher standard of living, probably better diet and better oral hygiene.

Now what kind of ethical consciousness allows one to continue to apply a possibly harmful process to unwilling people until there is absolute proof that it is harmful? I have seen this backward approach to safety in government reports on fluoridation. It goes like this: this study that shows association of fluoridation with this harmful effect is not a perfect study; there are weaknesses; therefore we will continue the process until it is shown with certainty that it is harmful. And no further research is recommended; no responsibility to support a better study is accepted. In the presence of a small and dubious benefit such a conclusion, more than being irresponsible, is outlandish.

You don’t have the moral right to do this to us, to one million people. You should stop it now. James S. Beck, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus of Medical Biophysics, University of Calgary

~~

Fluoride: risks and benefits? – Disinformation in the service of big industry

David R. Hill, P.Eng. Professor Emeritus The University of Calgary
CALGARY, Alberta Canada T2N 1N4

In conclusion, there is a political aspect. People in a free society have
a right to choose whether or not they will accept medication, and they have

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

a right to individual treatment and monitoring. Those who believe fluoride works are entitled to their opinion. They may choose their own experts and distrust the proven evidence of legal proceedings in court. They may ignore their own peer-reviewed medical journal reports showing significant and serious risks. That is their right. But they have no right to force others to drink

or use fluoride against their will, especially in the face of so much credible evidence of harms, with little or no benefit, and when more effective, democratic and medically responsible forms of medication exist. Nor should they promote the use of fluoride without reference to its dangers.

http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~hill/papers/risks-and-benefits.pdf

~~

Portland’s Vote Reflects Recent Scientific Findings on Fluoridation’s Risks

22 May, 2013
Portland dentist Dr. Jay Levy, DDS, who was active in opposing the Portland fluoridation measure, agreed. “Many dentists I know have the best intentions when it comes to fluoridation, but they just are not aware that the science regarding fluoridation risks has changed so significantly in recent years. For many, the belief that fluoridation is safe is akin to a knee-jerk reflex based on what they learned in dental school, and that’s a real problem when you’re dealing with public health.”

“Across the country, we are seeing people who once supported fluoridation switch their position after spending some time reading the recent studies for themselves and realizing that a practice they long assumed to be safe is far riskier than they thought,” says Michael Connett, a researcher with the Fluoride Action Network, the nation’s leading organization on fluoridation issues.

“Portland voters chose to protect children from risky fluoridation chemicals. As a community, we stand on the side of science, which clearly shows growing cause for concern about health risks associated with fluorosilicic acid. Anyone can spend an hour on the internet and read for themselves what the National Academy of Science report has to say about fluoride’s risks,” says Antonia Giedwoyn with the Sierra Club’s Columbia Group, which has opposed the Portland fluoridation measure.

http://www.fluoridealert.org/news/cwp_may22/

~~

Christopher-Bryson-The-Fluoride-Deception

http://www.scribd.com/doc/121795065/Christopher-Bryson-The-Fluoride-Deception

~~

Poisoning childrens’ milk

http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/education/flouride-plan-for-school-milk-to-target- decay-1-5961467

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

For an exercise is futility the addition of fluoride to milk takes some beating. Why? Well, fluoride is a poison, and calcium is the antidote to fluoride poisoning – so when fluoride is added to milk, the fluoride is inactivated (forming insoluble calcium fluoride) and is no longer available – calcium fluoride in the diet passes through the body virtually without being absorbed! Pointless? You bet!

So here’s a question that you should first ask the fluoride pushers who want to stuff this nasty chemical into highly vulnerable kids, who are already living on the borderline of fluoride overload. If you want to prevent the disease of dental decay, and administer a substance – fluoride – that you claim is effective, then it’s a medicine. Yes I know that the EU has said that fluoride is a ‘mineral’ – but only last week the European Food Safety Agency admitted that there is no nutritive requirement for fluoride – it has no biological function. If you claim that a food has medical properties, it’s a medicine, end of story.

So where is the medicinal license that every medicine is required to have? Fluoridated ‘dental milk’ has NO MEDICINAL LICENSE ! It’s illegal to administer the stuff – to kids or anyone else. Asking parents to consent – now why would you want to do that if it’s not a medicine? – is like asking them to agree to letting their kids be kicked around by adults in the street – you can’t ask them to consent to an illegal act!

So Councils – please wake up to this appalling scam. It doesn’t work, it’s not licensed for treating a disease, and it’s a criminal offense to promote the damned stuff. So send these lunatics packing – ignore the dental lobby, they’re not qualified to offer a scientific opinion. Just stop letting them dose the kids with this absurd product and bring back the school dentists instead!

Doug Cross UKCAF www.ukcaf.org
~~
SPORTS INJURIES AUSTRALIA WIDE EPIDEMIC

SPORTS injuries caused from overuse are becoming more common among children
and adolescents, Adelaide orthopedic surgeons have warned.
South Australia fluoridated since 1971. http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/sturt-football-club-chief-medical-officer- david-martin-treating-more-injuries-in-children/story-e6frea83-1226658079572

Fluoride magnifies impact of repetitive stress on joints

http://www.fluoridealert.org/studies/arthritis04/
More here: http://www.fluoridealert.org/?s=joint+and+bone+fluoride

And then this information below is from Robert Gammal’s website, he is a practicing dentist.

1. Fluoride exposure disrupts the synthesis of collagen and leads to
the breakdown of collagen in bone, tendon, muscle, skin, cartilage, lungs, kidney and trachea.

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

A.K. Susheela and Mohan Jha, “Effects of Fluoride on Cortical and Cancellous Bone Composition”, IRCS Medical Sciences: Library Compendium, Vol 9, No.11, pp.1021-1022 (1981);

Y.D. Sharma, “Effect of Sodium Fluoride on Collagen Cross-Link Precursors”, Toxocological Letters, Vol.10, pp97-100 (1982);

A.K. Susheela and D. Mukerjee, “Fluoride poisoning and the Effect of
Collagen Biosynthesis of Osseous and Nonosseous Tissue”, Toxocologiocal European Research, Vol 3, No.2, pp. 99-104 (1981);

Y.D. Sharma,”Variations in the Metabolism and Maturation of Collagen
after Fluoride Ingestion”, Biochemica et Bioiphysica Acta, Vol 715, pp.137-141 (1982);

Marian Drozdz et al.,”Studies on the Influence of Fluoride Compounds
upon Connective Tissue metabolism inGrowing Rats” and “Effect of Sodium Fluoride With and Without Simultaneous Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride on Collagen Metabolism”, Journal of Toxological Medicine, Vol. 4, pp.151-157 (1984).

http://www.robertgammal.com/Fluoride/SciFactsFl.html

+

FLUORIDE: THE AGING FACTOR’

Extract:
Dr. John Yiamouyiannis was, until his death in the fall of 2000, the world’s leading authority on the biological effects of fluoride. His formal education included a B.S. in biochemistry from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D in biochemistry from the University of Rhode Island. After a year of postdoctoral research at Western Reserve University Medical School, Yiamouyiannis went on to become biochemical editor at Chemical Abstracts Service, the world’s largest chemical information center. It was at Chemical Abstracts Service, where Yiamouyiannis became interested in the damaging effects of fluoride.

Chapter 4 – Breaking Down the Body’s Glue All animals, including humans, are made up of cells. The cell, the basic unit of life, can be identified under a microscope by its outer membrane and a nucleus within the membrane.

Some cells are able to produce a protein called collagen. In this book, the term “collagen” refers to collagen as well as collagen-like proteins. This process occurs inside the cell. Little globules called vesicles carry the collagen from the inside of the cell to the cell membrane where it is released to the outside of the cell. There, the collagen thickens into fibers.

The five different types of cells capable of producing and releasing collagen in this way are: fibroblasts, which produce collagen for the structural support of skin, tendons, ligaments and muscle;
chondroblasts, which produce collagen for the structual support of cartilage;

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

osteoblasts, which produce collagen for the structual foundation and framework upon which calcium and phosphate are deposited, giving rise to bone;
ameloblasts, which produce collagen for the structural foundation and framework upon which calcium and phosphate are deposited, giving rise to tooth enamel.

odontoblasts, which produce collagen for the structual foundation and framework upon which calcium and phosphate are deposited, giving rise to the inner part of the tooth. This material is called dentin.

Like other proteins, collagen is composed of amino acids linked together in a chain. However, collagen contains two additional amino acids, hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine, not found in other proteins. Thus when collagen breaks down, the hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine levels in the blood and urine increase.

Researchers from Harvard University and the National Institutes of Health knew in the 1960s that fluoride disrupted collagen synthesis. It was not until 1979-1981, however, that a new flurry of research activity in this area began. End Extract http://www.fluoridealert.org/aging-factor.htm

~~

THE ARTHRITIS TRUST OF AMERICA ON “FLUORIDE” FLUORIDATION: GOVERNMENTALLY APPROVED POISON THE RHEUMATOID DISEASE FOUNDATION
The City Commissioners turned to me, and asked my opinion. Being somewhat naive and sans research, I agreed with the nurse, and so together we naively, innocently, and stupidly added fluoride to the City of Fairview’s (Tennessee) water supply, and that addition continues to this date, despite the fact that the citizens of the City of Fairview, TN have never had an opportunity to know the pros and cons of fluoridation or to vote for or against the issue.

We unknowingly doomed hundreds of Fairview citizens to Arthrosis, vertebral and hip fracture, osteosarcoma (cancer), infertility, birth defects, bone damage, damage to the immune system, fluorosis, fluoride neurotoxicity, and many other poorly diagnosed conditions, as fluoride affects every human system, often by inhibiting enzymes which are essential for the functioning of every human system.

Besides the damaging of human tissue by 1 ppm of fluoride added to our public water systems, the health problem is also one of massive over-consumption of fluoride. We are being bombarded with fluoride from all our dental products and also many industrial sources.

Learn more: http://www.arthritistrust.org/Articles/Fluoride.pdf

+

Fluoride Action Network

Arthritis

http://www.fluoridealert.org/issues/health/arthritis/

~~~

Fluoride, Gingivitis & Oral Cancer

© 2002 PFPC Summary:

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Gingivitis and periodontal disease are the oral diseases requiring most urgent intervention. Over 90% of the U.S. population over 13 is affected. Strong links have been made to heart disease and low birth weight and infant mortality. For heart disease the association with gingivitis is stronger than the one for smoking or high cholesterol. As heart disease is the #1 killer in the US, many efforts are undertaken to reduce this alarming figure. In Canada large pictures of a diseased heart are placed on cigarette packs alerting to the fact that smoking causes heart disease.

It is of great importance that warning labels and pictures of periodontal disease, oral cancer, diseased hearts, pituitary and thyroid glands, as well as Alzheimer’s brains – just to name a few – are placed on all oral care products containing fluoride.
Why?

Patents by the pharmaceutical company Sepracor disclose that concentrations of fluorides from fluoridated toothpastes and mouthwashes activate G proteins in the oral cavity, thereby promoting gingivitis and periodontitis, as well as oral cancer. Incomprehensibly, this vital information is being withheld from the public by all parties involved, including the company, at least two well-known Universities, and numerous oral disease experts. THIS INCLUDES A MUCH-DECORATED ADA SCIENTIST WHO WAS INVOLVED IN SETTING THE CDC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FLUORIDE INTAKE IN CHILDREN, SERVED AS HEAD OF A FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION SUBCOMMITTEE THAT DECIDES WHICH DENTAL PRODUCTS TO MAKE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, AND WHO CHAIRED THE PANEL ON SAFE USE OF FLUORIDE FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL . (CDC, 2001)

sourced here: www.npwa.org.uk/index.php?view=article&catid=37%253Ato-be- categorised&id=96%253Aa-bombshell-to-stop-fluoridation&option=com_content&Itemid=92

~~

FLUORIDATION: A HORROR STORY

By Wade Frazier
Brief extract: In the fluoridation issue, the same conflicts of interest and corruption that pervade organized medicine are clearly seen. The AMA has never has had much to do with promoting the public’s well being, instead promoting cigarettes and helping to cover up health disasters. That dynamic can also be found in the American Dental Association (ADA), where its financial relationship with candy companies is similar to the relationship the AMA had for generations with the tobacco interests. In 1995, the ADA received 15% of its money from trade groups such as the Sugar Association, Coca-Cola, and M & M. The ADA actively promotes compulsory fluoridation. The ADA was also guilty of stating that the ACLU endorsed fluoridation when it in fact did not.[34] Since 1993, the ADA has had to drop many organizations from its list of fluoridation supporters, including the EPA.[35]
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm

~~

“Physiologic Conditions Affect Toxicity of Ingested Industrial Fluoride,” Journal of Environmental and Public Health, vol. 2013, Article ID 439490, 13 pages, 2013. Richard Sauerheber, doi:10.1155/2013/439490. Available online at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ jeph/2013/439490/

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

My work as a Professor and Health Researcher is supported by the UK Department of Health, I am a member of the UK Faculty of Public Health and have a number of funded research projects from the National Institutes for Health Research in the UK.
I have consistently opposed fluoridation policy due to the poor evidence base on its effectiveness, genuine concerns about potential health problems (requiring further research) and, therefore, the fact that imposing fluoridation is unethical.

Professor Stephen Peckham BSc. MA(Econ)., HMFPH Director, Centre for Health Services Studieshttp://www.kent.ac.uk/chss/

Professor of Health Policy
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Director, Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System

www.prucomm.ac.uk

University of Kent George Allen Wing Canterbury
Kent

CT2 7NF

Critical Public Health
Slaying sacred cows: is it time to pull the plug on water fluoridation? Stephen Peckham Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
Version of record first published: 15 Nov 2011
To cite this article: Stephen Peckham (2012): Slaying sacred cows: is it time to pull the plug on water fluoridation?, Critical Public Health, 22:2, 159-177
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2011.596818

~~
The Case Against Fluoride (ISBN: 9781603582872) by Dr. Paul Connett, Dr. James Beck, and Dr. Spedding Micklem.
A Response to Pro-Fluoridation Claims (free extract): http://www.fluoridealert.org/uploads/ proponent_claims.pdf

The Case Against Fluoride How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Power Politics That Keep It there by Paul Connett, Phd, James Beck, MD, PhD, H.S. Micklem, DPhil

Quote from Albert W. Burgstahler, Phd., Professor Emeritus Of Chemistry, The University Of Kansas, Editor, Fluoride Research www.fluorideresearch.org

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

It is my hope that this book The Case Against Fluoride How Hazardous Waste Ended Up In Our Drinking Water And The Bad Science And Powerful Politics That Keep It There by Paul Connett, PhD, James Beck, MD, PhD, H.S. Micklem, DPhil, will enable good science to prevail over dogma on this issue. This is important not only to end a significant health threat to fluoridated populations but also because it is critical for a civil society to be informed by honest science. This change can occur only if enough people – especially new generations of scientists, doctors and dentists – want it to happen.

~~

ANIMALS

Reference:

THE CASE AGAINST FLUORIDE HOW HAZARDOUS WASTE ENDED UP IN OUR DRINKING WATER AND THE BAD SCIENCE AND POWERFUL POLITICS THAT KEEP IT THERE by Paul Connett, PhD, James Beck, MD, PhD, H.S. Micklem, DPhil

Extracted from Page 124 The Evidence of Harm Heading ANIMAL STUDIES

There are many animal studies of fluoride’s impact on the bone and brain, as well as on the endocrine and reproductive systems. These are discussed in subsequent chapters along with some important human studies.

FARM AND DOMESTIC ANIMAL STUDIES
Normally, when we talk about animal studies, we are thinking about animals used in lab studies, like rats, mice and guinea pigs. However, in the history of fluoride pollution (see chapter 9) the fluoride poisoning of farmyard animals has been of great concern. Grazing cows have literally been brought to their knees by fluoride emissions from aluminum smelters.

One of the pioneers in researching the IMPACTS OF FLUORIDE on farmyard animals was DR. LENNART KROOK, A VETERINARY PATHOLOGIST at Cornell University. Dr. Krook passed away in April, 2010. One of his last studies involved investigating the mysterious illnesses affecting a number of quarter horses on Cathy and Wayne Justus’ farm in Pagosa Springs, Colorado. Some of the horses died. It was only when Cathy and Wayne Justus changed the horses’ water supply that the symptoms of the remaining animals began to clear up. Dr. Krook was able to show that the likely cause of the horses’ ailments was fluoride. This event led to the halting of fluoridation in Pagosa Springs. A very disturbing videotape of these horses can be viewed online. The Justus and Krook study was published in the journal Fluoride in 2006.

The problem for both cows and horses is that they drink very large quantities of water, so should they be exposed to fluoridated water, their fluoride exposure can be very high indeed.

ANOTHER ANIMAL THAT MIGHT BE VERY SENSITIVE TO FLUORIDE IS THE DOG.
The dog is one of the few animals that succumbs to osteosarcoma, and larger dogs commonly lose strength in their rear legs.

Fluoride is known to cause arthritic-like symptoms and is suspected of causing osteosarcoma in both rats and humans (see chapter l8. With the possibility that dogs are getting high levels of

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

fluoride in pet food, especially pet food that contains bonemeal, there is a very real chance that fluoride may be the causative agent for these conditions. These speculations need to be investigated.

SUMMARY
The chemistry and biochemistry of fluoride and its kinetics in the body, are such that fluoride can function as a cumulative poison when small amounts are ingested over a long period by drinking fluoridated water. Fluoride circulates in the blood and accumulates in calcifying tissues, which include the bone, the teeth, and the pineal gland. It can inhibit the function of a variety of enzymes in vitro (‘in vitro’ literally means ‘in glass’ and is used to indicate an experiment performed outside the whole body). Also in vitro, in combination with traces of aluminum, fluoride can interfere with G proteins, used by many water-soluble messengers, such as hormones and growth factors, to deliver their messages to the inside of the cells of tissues they help regulate. Although more difficult to prove, it is reasonable to assume that many of the effects seen in vitro can occur in the whole body. END EXTRACT

~~~
Professional Perspectives on Water Fluoridation:

http://www.fluoridealert.org/fan-tv/prof-perspectives/

~~

Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards | 2006

Committee on Fluoride in Drinking Water, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences
> Recommendations: pp. 87-88, 101-102, 130, 180, 204, 222-223, 266-267, 302-303, 338-339, 352-353 | FAN

> Expert viewpoints: Panelist statements | Thiessen interview | Limeback clarifications
> Relevance to Margin of Safety: FAN | Connett 2008 | Connett 2011 Source: http://afamildura.wordpress.com/reports-reviews/

~~

HUMAN TOXICITY, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF WATER FLUORIDATION (343 Pages). “The staggering evidence which stacks up against fluoridation is frightening, and I cannot understand why any Minister for Health has continued this process for over 40 years.”http://www.enviro.ie/Human%20Toxicity%2c%20Environmental%20Impact%20and%20Legal %20Implications%20of%20Water%20Fluoridation_February%202012_EnviroManagement %20Services.pdf

~~
FLUORIDE HEALTH EFFECTS DATABASE: http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/ ~~

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

FIREWATER FILM www.firewaterfilm.com

~~

Water Fluoridation an absolute fraud and failure:-

Australia in dental crisis after widespread fluoridation Australia wide for decades first commencing Beaconsfield Tasmania in 1953 (also in dental crisis and chronically diseased) and USA also in dental crisis after up to 67 years of water fluoridation/pollution first commencing Grand Rapids, Michigan in 1945 (also in dental crisis – Kentucky USA l00% fluoridated also in dental crisis and chronically diseased). It’s a no-brainer – dangerously corrosive hazardous waste pollutants & co- contaminants have no place being disposed/dumped into the peoples’ water supplies and hence also contaminating/polluting our food chain. All water fluoridation (pollution) must cease immediately & irrevocably for all time.

27th February, 2013 – Tasmania will receive an extra $12 million from Federal Government to reduce public dental waiting lists. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-02-27/extra-dental-dollars-to- reduce-waiting-lists/4542450?section=tas
POOR ORAL HEALTH PUTTING HOSPITALS UNDER PRESSURE – TASMANIA -26 Feb, 2012

http://www.examiner.com.au/story/431159/poor-oral-health-putting-hospitals-under-pressure/

DENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM IN DECAY
Dr Deborah Cole is chief executive officer of Dental Health Services Victoria. http:// www.theage.com.au/opinion/a-system-in-decay-20120107-1ppd0.html

Geelong – fluoridated/polluted June, 2009
GEELONG kids will have more to smile about thanks to a multi-million-dollar State Government plan to tackle tooth decay and gum disease. Health Minister launched the $14.9 million public dental plan, aimed at improving the oral health of young people across the state. http:// www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2013/05/29/366034_news_pf.html

REPORT WARNS $10B NEEDED TO FIX DENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM February 28, 2012

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-02-28/national-dental-health-opens-denticare-debate/3856134

NSW 96% ‘FLUORIDATED’ – Sydney since 1968 DENTAL CRISIS EXPOSES GREAT DIVIDE February 15, 2005
Public dental health in NSW is in a state of serious neglect, with some patients waiting 8 years for attention & the number of children needing hospital treatment doubling over the past decade. http://www.smh.com.au/news/Health/Dental-crisis-exposes-great-divide/ 2005/02/14/1108229934499.html

50% of Children have tooth decay in Australia yet, Australia is almost fully fluoridated. How about we stop consuming sugar in everything, reduce dental costs and educate children/people to daily oral healthcare instead of dumping industrial waste into water supplies and hence also contaminating our food chain.http://www.cosmeticdentistryguide.co.uk/news/more-than-50-of-children-have-tooth-decay-in- australia-9526

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Fluoridation Fails – alarming rise in dental hospitalizations U.S. 10th September, 2013 Despite decades of water fluoridation and fluoridated toothpaste that was supposed to all but eradicate tooth decay and put dentists out of business, the opposite is true. From 2000 to 2008, more than 61,000 people were hospitalized in the U.S. for a dental abscess, a 41% increase. The burden on Medicaid to pay for discharges related to periapical abscesses has jumped 74%. Sixty- six patients died while in the hospital. http://www.topix.com/business/dental/ 2013/09/1309098IGFUV Full story: www.drbicuspid.com

An Australian Example of Fluoridation Dictatorship

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2011/AFN_2011N1_JanMar_AquaPura.pdf#page=5

2007 The Australian Fluoridation News – Is there a case of Government Fraud?

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2007/AFN_2007N4_JulAug_AquaPura.pdf

Can Dentists & Doctors be trusted when they say Water Fluoridation is Safe & Effective?

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/can-dentists-doctors-be-trusted- when-they-say-water-fluoridation-is-safe-effective.pdf

The only answer EVER was to provide access to affordable dental health care services for all the population, not the disposal of hazardous waste pollutants and co-contaminants known as water fluoridation; into our drinking water supplies and hence also the contamination of our food chain and using the populations’ kidneys as hazardous waste disposal/filtration units.

~~~

Civil Rights Violation Regarding Forced Medication

extract:

WHEREAS, the proponents of fluoridation promised a safe and effective dental health additive, but the San Antonio Water System’s (SAWS) contract for fluoridation chemicals proves a “bait and switch”; as SAWS is adding the toxic waste by-product of the phosphate fertilizer industry, that has no warranty for its safety and effectiveness for any purpose from the supplier (PENCCO, Inc.) or the source (Mosaic Chemical); and

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that LULAC commends efforts by organizations that oppose forced mass medication of the public drinking supplies using fluorides that are industrial grade, toxic waste by-products which contain contaminants (arsenic, lead, mercury) which further endanger life; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that LULAC supports efforts by all citizens working to stop forced medication through the public water system because it violates civil rights;

and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that LULAC opposes the public policy of fluoridation because it fails to meet legislative intent;

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that LULAC demands to know why government agencies entrusted with protecting the public health are more protective of the policy of fluoridation than they are of public health.

Approved this 1st day of July 2011.
Margaret Moran
LULAC National President http://lulac.org/advocacy/resolutions/2011/ resolution_Civil_Rights_Violation_Regarding_Forced_Medication/

~~

“As a former city councilwoman, I was instrumental in investigating my constituents complaints about the harmfulness of water fluoridation. As a result I helped in getting an initiative to the ballot and we successfully voted in a moratorium on Nov 6, ’12 to turn off the toxic industrial waste fluoride (HYDROFLUSOLICIC ACID OR HFSA) because our supplier UNIVAR, (formerly Basic Chemical Solutions) would not provide three things: 1.) Toxicological report 2.) Listing of contaminants 3.) Proof that their product was safe for all water consumers, infants to seniors. This absurd practice of adding HFSA is based more on politics than science. Why should a water department be given the power to medicate anyone when they don’t take a health history, they don’t pass out a listing of side effects or monitor the dose. This is tantamount to gross negligence. Water consumers started to send in their payment UNDER PROTEST so that when the class action lawsuits begin they would be covered. After adding water fluoridation for 44 years, our town had 70% cavities in our childrens’ teeth,(this figure was quoted from Dr. Susan Wellman, dentist who is pro-fluoride) high obesity rates and low test scores. Hardly an endorsement for continuing this unethical practice. We were also ranked 34th in the nation for cancer while Brookings, Oregon….. just 25 minutes north of us…. was ranked 765th in the nation for cancer for the same time period and Bookings never fluoridated their water.

We have high rates of not only cancer, but thyroid, diabetes and kidney disease all with links to HFSA. One constituent ended up in ER with seizures after showering for 10 minutes. Her doctor has subsequently written a letter describing her allergic reaction to water fluoridation. She was on a medication which contained fluoride and that in combination with absorbing this poison transdermaly by showering put her in the Emergency Room. New Hampshire Governor Lynch signed into law on Aug 4, 2012 infant warnings concerning mixing fluoridated water with formula because of the high prevalence of fluorosis. Fluorosis is the first visible sign of fluoride poisoning. Our Environmental Protection Agency announced in early 2011 that 41% of our nations teenagers had fluorosis and recommended cutting the parts per million down to .7. Our city council reduced the ppm from 1.2 to .7. That was a step in the right direction but not nearly enough because our EPA is doing nothing to really test or protect the public from this toxic industrial waste product.

The only safe level when considering the addition of HFSA to drinking/bathing water is ZERO.

The State of Kansas, has successfully entered House Bill 2372 on January 18, 2013 listing the harm of water fluoridation. If passed, Kansas will become the first fluoride-free state in the United States.

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

If you happen to call the NSF (which is not a government agency) and ask them questions about the testing they do on HFSA, they will tell you that they won’t provide that information because of non- disclosure agreements. If you call the manufacturer, distributor or supplier, they will not provide information about the 3 requested docs listed in my opening paragraph above as I already did that back in 2011. I sent out over 40 letters and got zero responses.

I predict that water fluoridation will become one of the biggest frauds and scams ever perpetrated against the public in the 20th and 21st century. That phrase often quoted by the CDC as being one of the best things since sliced bread was made up by a Public Relations guy. It’s time to stop quoting that drivel. Water fluoridation will be compared to Tobacco science, DDT science, Asbestos science, Thalidomide science, etc. It is my opinion based on the research I’ve done which has been extensive these last 5 years, that it’s all about the money. Some brilliant schemers came up with this idea to get rid of toxic industrial waste by saying it was good for children’s teeth. That’s a bunch of baloney. It’s good for the bank accounts of the producers of HFSA because if they had to get rid of their toxic industrial waste legally, it would cost them hundreds of millions of dollars.

Instead they dupe the politicians with fraudulent science and endorsements which is not science and sell them a product in which humans are utilized to filter this poison through their bodies while 99% goes down the drain. The dumb politicians buy it hook, line and sinker and shut their brains down. They become incapable of independent thought as I witnessed first hand with my fellow council members and other councils I’ve visited. But the HFSA manufacturers, suppliers and distributors are laughing all the way to the bank because they’ve got these municipalities paying them for poison. Plus, I checked out our retirement accounts and lo and behold, the MOSAIC company is one of the funds city employees can invest their retirement money in. Again, as I said, brilliant scheme from start to finish. I just hope to see the day that some of them end up in prison.

But here’s the part they don’t tell you. In 2011, our city finished a $43.8 million upgrade/expansion on our waste water treatment plant with state-of-the-art technology that utilizes MBR or Membrane Bio-Reactor technology. When I asked our Public Works Director if this gets the fluoride out of the water, he replied, “NO.” So this poison is going into our Pacific Ocean. Poison the public. Poison the oceans. Poison the food and beverages. Because of that, we are all already over-fluoridated. Please do your homework.

Respectfully, Donna A. Westfall, Former City Councilwoman, Crescent City, Calif.”

~~

Corporate Sponsorship of Dental Schools/Universities

** The Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University ofAdelaide. S.A. http://www.arcpoh.adelaide.edu.au/ ** Same School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, S.A. Colgate Australian Clinical Dental Research Centre (CACDRC) h t t p : / /

health.adelaide.edu.au/dentistry/colgate/

~~

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Corporate `sponsorship` of our Dental Schools in Australian Universities is (allegedly) like leaving the wolves to mind the lambs. Allegedly, this is a most serious conflicts of interests and complete loss of ethics and integrity.

The informed and independently researched/unbiased members of the population are sick of the fact that for decades the Fluoridation Lobby remain so politically and media powerful – and that’s the only way these dangerously corrosive hazardous waste pollutants fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium etc., (known as water fluoridation chemicals) (also added is aluminium sulphate) continues to be disposed of into our drinking water supplies and hence also contaminating our food chain – the truth never gets to the people by way of headlines in a totally controlled corporate mainstream media – this is appalling.

Also many of the population are still unaware because authorities lie and say the ‘fluoride’ is natural – this is absolutely deceptive and a cover-up.
Hereunder, is what they are consuming in their water, of course it’s all through the food chain, and they bath their babies, children, themselves and their pets in these hazardous waste pollutants – it is insane and Australia’s disgrace, that we the population, pets and environment are deliberately, forcibly, recklessly, wilfully and arrogantly polluted with this hazardous waste known as water fluoridation.

All thinking people must ask, who in their right minds would force an entire population to consume this in everything we eat, drink and bathe in, also ask why would Dentists and doctors fight to the death to enforce this pollutant on us all and our environment if as they say it is effective at reducing dental decay by between 30 and 60% thus reducing their income. What BS ! They say it is safe and effective and Australia wide and USA all in dental crisis after decades of the poison fluoridation commencing firstly in Australia 1953 and USA in 1945.

“Physiologic Conditions Affect Toxicity of Ingested Industrial Fluoride,” Journal of Environmental and Public Health, vol. 2013, Article ID 439490, 13 pages, 2013. Richard Sauerheber, doi: 10.1155/2013/439490. Available online at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jeph/2013/439490/

Fluoridation = What you are drinking, bathing in and it’s all through the food chain:- Hydrofluoric Acid – Acutely toxic chemical

http://www-esh.fnal.gov/CourseHandout_Mat/Hydrofluoric_Acid_Safety_Handout.pdf

Explaining the truth about “water fluoridation” and the phosphate mining industry www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEZ15m-D_n8&feature=share

FLUORIDATION CHEMICALS

http://afamildura.wordpress.com/fluoridation-chemicals/

Fluosilicic Acid. TOXNET profile from Hazardous Substances Data Base

www.fluoridealert.org/pesticides/fluosilicic.acid.toxnet.hsd.htm

Raw Fluoridation Chemical Analyses

http://sapphireeyesproductions.blogspot.com.au/2010/11/foi-water-analysesfor-sa-2010.html

http://

http://

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Hydrofluorosilicic Acid Origins

http://cof-cof.ca/hydrofluorosilicic-acid-origins/

Fluoride Class Action http://fluoride-class-action.com/what-is-in-it

REPORT: 100% fluoridated Kentucky, USA – Rampant Dental Decay & chronic disease epidemic – DDB http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/rampant-dental-decay- chronic-disease-epidemic-in-100-fluoridated-kentucky-usa-13-aug-2013-ddb.pdf

Can Dentists & Doctors be trusted when they say Water Fluoridation is Safe & Effective?

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/can-dentists-doctors-be-trusted- when-they-say-water-fluoridation-is-safe-effective.pdf

Fluoridegate – The Film http://www.fluoridegate.org/ USA EPA shredded evidence of harm and fired Chief Scientist/Toxicologist in an attempt to silence him.

~~
They can’t be trusted……… see this; Australian Government still using deadly dispersants, ………and still also sitting back after up to 60 years allowing and/or forcing the chronic poisoning of our population, pets and environment with dangerously corrosive hazardous waste pollutants fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, etc., known as ‘water fluoridation’.
60 Minutes Highly toxic dispersants still used in Australia http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/ article.aspx?id=8711153
Last week’s story here The dispersant, when mixed with the oil, increases in toxicity by 52 times. This sickly, invisible toxin, still lurks in the water and absorbs straight into peoples’ skin. In this special 60 Minutes investigation, we reveal the same chemical dispersants have been sprayed on the Great Barrier Reef and off the north west coast of Australia.
They’re still approved for use and our authorities are clueless as to how deadly they are.

http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8706910

~~

The N.H.M.R.C. in their book “The Effectiveness of Water Fluoridation” p.131., explained the need to examine poison regulations concerning fluoride toothpaste which was registered as an ‘ S5 POISON’ as printed on the package. The Answer by N.H.M.R.C. Fluoride Toothpaste an S5 poison was reclassified as “Cosmetic for sales regulations”.

Here we have the Australian Government’s professional and honest sorcery of changing an S5 POISON into a safe benign product by altering its scientific health category into a cosmetic by reclassification! All S5 POISON LABELS on fluoride toothpaste were removed, not for your health reason, no, it was to help commercial SALES that superceded the health and rightful Government protection of Australian people.

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2005/scientific_foibles_of_fluoride.htm

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

~~

Also let us clarify something regarding FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK (Professor Paul Connett) website www.fluoridealert.org – FAN seeks to broaden awareness about the toxicity of fluoride compounds among citizens, scientists, and policymakers alike. FAN not only provides comprehensive and up-to-date information, but remains vigilant in monitoring government agency actions that impact the public’s exposure to fluoride.

I am sure many will be disturbed by the actions of the ADA and when this first happened some years ago, it certainly was disturbing to all Truth Seekers; the lengths to which some pro-fluoride fanatics go, in this case, please note that after Fluoride Action Network and the dot org domain was originally secured (fluoridealert.org ) and before Fluoride Action Network could secure the domain name fluoridealert.com – that the American Dental Association (allegedly) deviously many say, swooped in and ‘nicked’ the fluoridealert.com domain name of Fluoride Action Network’s fluoridealert.org

So to re-clarify this ‘interesting’ piece of pro-fluoride ‘manoeuvering’/deception by the ADA:- Fluoride Action Network Professor Paul Connett www.fluoridealert.org

American Dental Association (who allegedly) ‘nicked’ the dot com www.fluoridealert.com I guess that’s a pretty effective way to impede people and researchers getting truth !
~~

News regarding the disgraceful conflict of interests of VICE-President of British Fluoridation Society from Doug Cross UK Councils Against Fluoridation http://www.ukcaf.org

The hasty resignation of Andy Burnham from the British Fluoridation Society does not signal a retreat over the imposition of water fluoridation.
Doug Cross UKCAF 15th June 2009
The appointment of Andy Burnham, MP, Vice-President of the British Fluoridation Society (BFS), as Secretary of State for Health has revealed to the public just how dangerously out of touch the Prime Minister has become with public concerns. The revelation of Mr Burnham’s close relationship with the BFS on Tuesday last, apparently undisclosed in the Parliamentary Register of Members’ Interests, led to the immediate announcement of his resignation from the BFS.

But he came bouncing back, unapologetic and fighting mad, with an outburst of brazen aggression that will surely have shaken any health professional who lives by the ethical code underlying the practice of medicine. At the National Health Service Confederation’s annual conference in Liverpool Mr Burnham said that the Government had been too timid at times on the public health agenda, and exhorted the delegates to ignore public opposition to water fluoridation, saying “ don’t feel you have to wait for permission to invest in prevention . . . Let’s press ahead with fluoridation of water supplies, given the clear evidence that it can improve children’s dental health.” Website and pdf file available here:- http://www.ukcaf.org/ a_conflict_of_interest__andy_burnham_quits_bfs.html

Doug Cross Environmental Analyst and Forensic Ecologist Website http://www.ukcaf.org ~~

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Australian Fluoridation Dictatorship ADA, AMA

The ADA asked for $200,000 and received $220,000 from Bligh’s Health Minister, Stephen Robertson to promote ‘fluoridation’ and their colleagues at the AMA sent a letter to Dr. Jeannette young, Chief Health Officer Queensland Health extract from FOI :-

These letters from ADA and AMA form part of this Report and can be accessed on the link

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/report-water-fluoridation-pollution-

must-end-diane-drayton-buckland-independent-researcher-14th-january-2013.pdf

referred to page 88/89.

Many view this allegedly, as tantamount to ‘conspiring’ to ‘mandate’ ‘water fluoridation’ and all water fluoridation (pollution with hazardous waste) should be banned urgently and irrevocably.

Can Dentists & Doctors be trusted when they say Water Fluoridation is Safe & Effective?

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/can-dentists-doctors-be-trusted- when-they-say-water-fluoridation-is-safe-effective.pdf

~~

The continuing fraud of water fluoridation/pollution is obscene:

Fluoridation & The Web Of Deceit. – Conflicts of Interests

The Girl Against Fluoride Independent Researcher and Activist – Ireland –

Professor Denis O Mullane is Vice Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Irish Expert Body of fluorides & health. Although he calls himself “an independent objective research worker in the field of Dental Public Health”, this man has promoted water fluoridation around the world for many years. He has pushed water fluoridation in South Africa along with Seamus Hickey.

Despite Mr Mullane’s pro fluoride bias, in 2002 Michael Martin gave him a grant estimated at a million to investigate the benefits and risks of water fluoridation.

The British Fluoridation Society includes Denis Mullane in their information leaflets. He is also connected with the British Nutrition Foundation – this was set up in the 1960’s by sugar & pharmaceutical companies such as Tate and Lyle ltd, Cadburys, Proctor & Gamble. Denis Mullane’s uncle was chief chemist of Irish Sugar Company.

Mr Mullane is part of a group rewriting a document on “Fluorides and Oral Health”, for the WHO. This is one of the men who continues to say that water fluoridation is safe & yet the chemicals used in water fluoridation in Ireland were banned for their use as a wood preservative.
~~

Bulletin of the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

Print version ISSN 0042-9686
Bull World Health Organ vol.83 no.9 Genebra Sept. 2005

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862005000900012

POLICY AND PRACTICE – The effective use of fluorides in public health
Sheila JonesI,1; Brian A. BurtII; Poul Erik PetersenIII; Michael A. LennonIV
IBritish Fluoridation Society, Ward 4, Booth Hall Children’s Hospital, Charlestown Road, Manchester M9 7AA, England
IIDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA
IIIOral Health Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
IVDepartment of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, England
Competing interests: Sheila Jones is a paid officer of the British Fluoridation Society – a not- for-profit organization funded largely by United Kingdom government health promotion grants to support water fluoridation initiatives. Michael A. Lennon is unpaid Chairman of the British Fluoridation Society. http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862005000900012&script=sci_arttext

~~
UK Government Health Departments fund the British Fluoridation Societyhttp://www.fluoridationfacts.com/news/pressrel/pr001203_006.htm

~~

The hasty resignation of Andy Burnham from the British Fluoridation Society does not signal a retreat over the imposition of water fluoridation.
Doug Cross UKCAF 15th June 2009
The appointment of Andy Burnham, MP, Vice-President of the British Fluoridation Society (BFS), as Secretary of State for Health has revealed to the public just how dangerously out of touch the Prime Minister has become with public concerns. The revelation of Mr Burnham’s close relationship with the BFS on Tuesday last, apparently undisclosed in the Parliamentary Register of Members’ Interests, led to the immediate announcement of his resignation from the BFS.

But he came bouncing back, unapologetic and fighting mad, with an outburst of brazen aggression that will surely have shaken any health professional who lives by the ethical code underlying the practice of medicine. At the National Health Service Confederation’s annual conference in Liverpool Mr Burnham said that the Government had been too timid at times on the public health agenda, and exhorted the delegates to ignore public opposition to water fluoridation, saying “ don’t feel you have to wait for permission to invest in prevention . . . Let’s press ahead with fluoridation of water supplies, given the clear evidence that it can improve children’s dental health.” Website and pdf file available here:- http://www.ukcaf.org/ a_conflict_of_interest__andy_burnham_quits_bfs.html

Doug Cross Environmental Analyst and Forensic Ecologist Website http://www.ukcaf.org ~~

Diane Drayton Buckland Independent Researcher

REPORT Brief Overview: http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/brief- overview-of-water-fluoridation_pollution-11-september-2013-diane-drayton-buckland1.pdf

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

REPORT: 100% fluoridated Kentucky, USA – Rampant Dental Decay & chronic disease epidemic – DDB http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/rampant- dental-decay-chronic-disease-epidemic-in-100-fluoridated-kentucky-usa-13-aug-2013-ddb.pdf

Can Dentists & Doctors be trusted when they say Water Fluoridation is Safe & Effective?

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/can-dentists-doctors-be-trusted- when-they-say-water-fluoridation-is-safe-effective.pdf

Some Health Effects: http://fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com/health-effects/

Download Full Report >

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/report-water-fluoridation-pollution- must-end-diane-drayton-buckland-independent-researcher-14th-january-2013.pdf

Aboriginals have even worse effects from fluorides than caucasians including the kidneys:-

NOTE: This article makes no reference to fluorides but does show Aboriginals are at high risk for renal disease!

Kidney Int. 2006 Jul;70(1):104-10. Epub 2006 May 24.

Silicofluorides (Water Fluoridation Chemicals)

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com/violencecriminality/silicofluorides-water- fluoridation-chemicals/

http://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/ aboriginal-prison-rates-violence-crime-silicofluorides-water-fluoridation-chemicals2.pdf

Website: http://fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com/fia-report-archives/ Anti-Fluoridation Association of Mildura http://afamildura.wordpress.com/basics/

An Australian Example of Fluoridation Dictatorship

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2011/AFN_2011N1_JanMar_AquaPura.pdf#page=5

2007 The Australian Fluoridation News – Is there a case of Government Fraud?http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2007/AFN_2007N4_JulAug_AquaPura.pdf

Australian Fluoridation News – Glen Walker – Extensive Information

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/australian_fluoridation_newsletters_home.htm Fluoridegate – The Film http://www.fluoridegate.org/

Other Documented Adverse Health Effects from Fluoride

http://www.fluoridation.com/adverse.htm
Firewater Film – Australia’s Industrial Fluoridation Disgrace www.firewaterfilm.com

Reduced nephron number and glomerulomegaly in Australian Aborigines: a group at high

risk for renal disease and hypertension. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16723986

Aboriginal Prison Rates – Violence and Crime – Kidney Disease – Silicofluorides (Water

Fluoridation Chemicals)

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013

Fluosilicic Acid. TOXNET profile from Hazardous Substances Data Basehttp://www.fluoridealert.org/pesticides/fluosilicic.acid.toxnet.hsd.htm

Archives Safe Water http://aswla.wordpress.com/posts/

The Great Culling Movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7BqFtyCRJc

Other Health Topics > Download Report from here: http:// fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/appendix-a-diane-buckland-report-14th- jan-2013.pdf

‘A Brief Primer’ on water fluoridation/pollution – Diane Drayton Buckland – 8 Oct. 2013