Centrelink ‘Ignoring Muslim Polygamous Relationships’ Benefits To Islamic Families With Several Wives

3b3ff77900000578-4020792-image-a-37_1481402043024

Australian Muslim families with more than one wife are receiving spousal benefits from Centrelink, it has been claimed.

Polygamous marriages, largely confined to Islamic families, are allowed to claim multiple family tax benefit payments for children living under the same roof, The Sunday Telegraph reported.

The welfare company has confirmed the agency does ‘not hold data based on polygamous relationships or religion’.

However, a Department of Human Services spokesperson told Daily Mail Australia families with ‘multiple partners are assessed exactly the same as any other person, under Australian law.

‘When granting income support, the department determines whether a payment is made at the single or partnered rate,’ the spokesperson said.

‘Being in more than one member-of-a-couple relationship has no bearing on that assessment – if you are in a member-of-a-couple relationship then you will be assessed at the partnered rate.

‘Eligibility is determined on an individual’s circumstances and there are no additional payments for having multiple partners.’

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4020792/Centrelink-paying-spousal-benefits-polygamous-Muslim-families.html?ito=social-facebook_Australia

3 thoughts on “Centrelink ‘Ignoring Muslim Polygamous Relationships’ Benefits To Islamic Families With Several Wives

  1. Sorry I did not understand what I read ..
    1) A Muslim man get’s married.
    2) He is married in a Mosque .. under Muslim law.
    3) He does not register his marriage with .. The Department of Births Deaths & Marriages
    4) The officials of the Mosque do not register the marriage with .. The Department of Births Deaths & Marriages.
    5) Therefore the Marriage is only legal in the eyes of Islam & not Australian Law.
    6) This Muslim man & his wife are not legitimately married in the eyes of the Australian Legal System.
    7) Therefore this marriage is .. classed as .. A DE FACTO RELATIONSHIP.

    * LET’S FIND OUT WHAT THE LAW SAYS .. A de facto relationship is defined in Section 4AA of the Family Law Act 1975. The law requires that you & your former partner, who may be of the same or opposite sex, had a relationship as a couple living together on a genuine domestic basis.

    8) a. So this Muslim man lived in domestic bliss with the said female & left her for another ?
    8) b. No he left the domestic abode that they shared to marry yet another female & live again in domestic bliss with the 2nd said female & left her also /
    8) c. Then he went off & married again .. yet another female ..
    AND NONE OF THESE UNIONS ARE REGISTERED WITH BIRTHS DEATHS & MARRIAGES .. WHY NOT ? ..
    WHY DO MUSLIM MEN NEED SO MAY WIVES & ARE THESE MARRIAGES DISCREETLY FORCED UPON THE FEMALE ?
    According to .. 7 NEWS .. the welfare agency .. BEING CENTRELINK .. REFUSES .. to collect the data .. UNDER ISLAMIC LAW ..

    THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS QUESTION HERE ..
    IS CENTRELINK & THEREFORE THE FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS .. REFUSING TO ..
    WHAT ARE THEY REFUSING TO DO .. ?
    CENTRELINK .. ON ORDERS FROM THE FEDERAL & STATE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA ..
    CENTRELINK HAS BEEN INSTRUCTED NOT TO BOTHER THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY WITH .. TRIVIAL DETAILS .. ABOUT WHAT IS BY AUSTRALIAN LAW … CRIMINAL ACTIVITY .. DEFRAUDING THE AUSTRALIA COFFERS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN ILLEGAL WELFARE PAYMENTS.

    SO MUSLIMS DO NOT HAVE TO REGISTER A MARRIAGE
    MUSLIMS ARE EXEMPT FROM LAWFULLY REGISTERING A MARRIAGE
    WHAT ELSE ARE THEY EXEMPT FROM ..
    WHAT OTHER ACTS ARE MUSLIMS ALLOWED TO DO ..
    YOU SEE IF IT WERE AN AUSTRALIAN .. CENTERLINK WOULD HAVE CUT THEIR WELFARE PAYMENTS IN A HEARTBEAT .. & LEGAL ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN.

    Well folks, it looks to me like we Australian are not wanted in Australia.

    * The political arena & the banking & financial sectors CONTINUOUSLY CRY POOR .. but in fact the evidence is to the contra .. AUSTRALIA HAS MONEY TO BURN .. yes folks hard earned tax payer dollars to burn.

  2. THE AGE .. Dec. 11. 2006 .. Howard defends citizenship test.

    “Prime Minister John Howard insists tough new rules forcing migrants wanting citizenship to pass tests in English are not aimed at not keeping some people out of Australia.”
    “Federal cabinet today ticked off plans to introduce new rules.”

    1) ALSO ..
    IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE COMPULSORY ..
    THAT ALL PEOPLE’S ENTERING AUSTRALIA ..
    FROM ALL NATIONALITIES & ALL RELIGIOUS PERSUASIONS ..
    WITH THE INTENT TO BECOME AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS ..
    BE OBLIGED TO OBEY AUSTRALIAN LAW.
    ALAS .. !
    OBVIOUSLY ..
    JOHN HOWARD THOUGHT IT TO BE TOO TRIVIAL TO MENTION.

  3. Polygomy is against the law in Australia. Centrelink is breaking the law by paying for multi spouse. Its my understanding that they allow this because its cheaper than paying for the other spouses as single parent payments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *