Dr Lily Nightingale highlights a crucial issue thrown up by the Ministry of Health (MOH) pursuing the messenger (Barry Young), instead of listening to his message about excess deaths within the MOH data, which he brought to light in order to help the people of New Zealand.
In Lily’s words:
When the Pfizer document, that Pfizer had sought to keep buried for SEVENTY FIVE years, was released, I noted that it listed NINE pages of side-effects.
Given the “safe and effective” mantra, day in and day out, I was curious to know what our government/MOH knew – and when they knew it.
On 9 March 2022, I submitted an OIA (Official Information Act) Request as follows:
“Please see attached. Page 30 onwards highlights 9 pages of adverse events to Pfizer’s covid vaccine.
1) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before recommending ANY vaccination in this country?
2) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before recommending mass roll out?
3) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before mandating certain job types?
4) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before opening vaccination for 5-11 year olds?
5) When were you aware of SOME of these side effects?
6) When were you aware of MANY of these side effects?
7) When were you aware of ALL of these side effects?
On 15 March 2022, I was advised that this information was already in the public domain and that there were “various OIA’s” I could look at, to find what I was looking for.
Of course, they wouldn’t tell me SPECIFICALLY in which OIA I would be able to locate the information. Instead, I had to spend many hours researching all the various documents, and searching for the answers.
I eventually found it in an OIA which had been published on 12 January 2022 .
It confirmed that the New Zealand Labour Government and the Ministry of Health, both knew ALL of the side-effects BEFORE the granting of approval by Medsafe (limited use, therefore not permitted for national roll out).
This crucial piece of the jigsaw puzzle confirms that the Labour Government under Jacinda Ardern, and the Ministry of Health headed by Director-General Ashley Bloomfield, both KNEW all of the side-effects BEFORE the first Covid Vaccine was given out in New Zealand.
I was in shock!
How could something with NINE pages of side-effects, EVER be called “safe and effective”?
We were lied to, daily, by Ardern and Bloomfield.
The Labour Government was not “the single source of truth”.
Instead it was a cesspit which offered, through endlessly repeated propaganda and lies, a sinister indoctrination of all those Kiwis who were too-trusting of the glib and deeply insincere assurances from Ardern and Bloomfield.
Our short interview with Dr Nightingale is now being shared widely on Twitter:
What should be the outcome of Dr Lily’s important disclosure here?
During a discussion with Maria Zeee of Zeee Media, about the MOAR data from brave Whistleblower Barry Young, Liz Gunn gives examples from the anonymised data, which offer evidence that would justify manslaughter and quite probably, murder charges against Jacinda Ardern.
Jim Ferguson also picked up on this same theme in an important tweet in December 2023 which is now heading towards a million views.
In Jim’s words:
Firstly, from an ethical standpoint, leaders bear a responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of their citizens. Implementing the Covid mandates with knowledge of its potential risks, without transparent communication or consent, violates this fundamental duty. If allegations are true, it’s imperative that Ardern faces these accusations and provides explanations for their decisions. Avoiding such scrutiny by fleeing abroad undermines the trust placed in them by the electorate.
Legally, every individual, including national leaders, must adhere to the principles of justice and the rule of law. If evidence suggests that a leader knowingly risked public health, they should be subject to legal processes to determine the extent of their liability. Fleeing to avoid such processes is not only a dereliction of duty but also a circumvention of the legal system that they once pledged to uphold.
Morally, the act of fleeing in the face of a crisis is a betrayal of the leader’s commitment to their nation. Leadership demands facing the consequences of one’s actions, especially when those actions have potentially endangered lives. It is a question of moral integrity and the courage to stand by one’s decisions, however consequential they may be.
Barry Young is the heroic Kiwi whistleblower who saw the clear evidence of excess deaths from the Covid jab rollout, while building a pay-per-dose database on behalf of the Ministry of Health in New Zealand.
The data is fully anonymised, so it threatens to expose no person’s private information.
The data shows the kill rates from the jab in different towns in New Zealand. This information should be openly given to the People because it is THEIR data.
Instead, the Ministry of Health are putting Barry Young on trial for sharing the shocking truths about excess deaths from the jab rollout. It appears that they are willing to hide this data from the People.
Why would the Ministry of Health persecute someone for telling the truth, when that person – Barry – is losing so much (including his job) by doing this, while gaining zero personal advantage?
Is this not the very essence of a scenario in which an honourable Whistleblower should be not only protected, but also praised for doing the right thing?
Can the MOH truly say they are doing the ‘right thing’ by the now – thousands of Kiwis who have been injured, and killed, by this Pfizer poison?
It is now up to The People of New Zealand to demand of the MOH that they “Release The Data” so that we can decide for ourselves what is the truth, and who is lying.
