Monsanto name to be wiped as BAYER consumes the evil corporation
Monsanto name to be wiped as BAYER consumes the evil corporation, creating the world’s largest chemical giant with a history of crimes against humanity
Bayer is expected to finish off its $62.5 billion purchasing deal with Monsanto this week — and plans to retire the infamous “Monsanto” name are already in gear. But even if the name Monsanto becomes a thing of the past, the company’s dirty deeds and hazardous products will continue to live on.
Bayer certainly knows a thing or two about re-branding to save face; once known as I.G. Farben, the company engaged in a number of disgusting acts back in the day, including using Jewish slave laborers during the Holocaust. Changing their name to Bayer has not mitigated this fact — though it certainly has helped the company remain profitable.
It’s sadly almost fitting that these two companies have ended up together, as both Bayer and Monsanto have a history of committing crimes against humanity. Unfortunately, this wicked pairing will spell disaster for the rest of us.
Changing names means nothing
As the merging of Bayer and Monsanto draws closer, Bayer has revealed that once combined, the name Monsanto will cease to exist. Instead, Monsanto and its products will simply become part of the Bayer “family.”
But will relabeling Roundup as a Bayer product change the fact that it’s toxic and makes people sick? No. Will the independent media suddenly stop reporting on their cancer-causing glyphosate and pernicious GMO products? Absolutely not. Monsanto may disappear in name, but its legacy of toxicity and disregard for human life will unfortunately live on — and people are right to be worried about what comes next.
Get more news like this without being censored: Get the Natural News app for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, lab test results, videos, podcasts and more. Bypass all the unfair censorship by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Get your daily news and videos directly from the source! Download here.
While the name Bayer may not currently draw as much ire as the name Monsanto does, it should — and perhaps one day it will. The Bayer company’s history is just as sordid and twisted as Monsanto’s, after all.
Over 20 years ago, Helge Wehmeier, then-head of Bayer Corp, publicly apologized to the late Elie Wiesel and other Holocaust survivors for the egregiously inhumane actions of I.G. Farben.
“I have sorrow and regret and apologize for the inhumanity in my country for what I.G. Farben did to your people,” Wehmeier said to Wiesel during a lecture in 1995. Wiesel was one of many Jewish slave laborers used by the company during the Holocaust. The company was also reportedly heavily invested in the development of Zyklon B, a toxic insecticide.
Bayer’s dark past
I.G. Farben scientists also conducted experiments on their captive slaves. In 2003, Holocaust survivor Zoe Polanska Palmer spoke out about her experiences as a Nazi test subject. Many SS doctors reportedly worked for Bayer’s parent company, I.G. Farben, including Dr. Victor Capesius and Dr. Helmut Vetter — both of whom were tried and convicted for various war crimes, with the latter being executed after the war. Capesius, Polanska Palmer says, is the doctor who experimented on her, and witnesses say he worked for Bayer.
Ms. Polanska Palmer was not alone; countless children were reportedly abducted and experimented on. In the late 1990’s, Eva Mozes Kor launched her own lawsuit against Bayer, claiming that the company supervised the purchasing of her and her twin from Nazis and that they were then used as “guinea pigs” by the infamous Josef Mengele. Kor alleges that she and other children were purposely infected with a host of diseases “to test the effectiveness of various drugs manufactured by Bayer.”
Ms. Kor stated at the time, “After 54 years, it is time that Bayer takes responsibility for their actions.” In addition to financial restitution, Kor said she wants to hear an actual apology. While Bayer has admitted to the use of slave labor, the company has not readily disclosed the other acts of evil their parent company was involved in.
In 2003, in response to Ms. Polanska Palmer’s claims, Bayer contended that the name Bayer didn’t even exist between 1925 and 1952, and so, the company we know today had nothing to do with I.G. Farben. Really?
As sources explain, I.G. Farben has never truly stopped existing. Even though the Allies broke up the company due to their evil and inhumane activities, it simply became three new companies: Bayer, Hoechst and BASF. As of 2012, I.G. Farben still existed as a company in liquidation.
Is Bayer really as far removed from I.G. Farben as it claims to be?
“creating the world’s largest chemical giant”
It is most likely that
MONSANTO
AND
BAYER
Were both experiencing financial difficulties
Not able to raise loans to continue doing business in their own right.
These to companies, both on the verge of bankruptcy
MERGED
To salvage what little they could.
Obviously MONSANTO was the company most in financial crisis & with the worst reputation & therefore the name MONSANTO was dropped.
Another bad guy bites the dust – olley !!
Banks are not never ending lenders.
At some point they say NO to loan applications.
Has anyone noticed that since the GFC of 2008 – banks have had nothing but grief.
It is because the went broke & the bailout monies were not enough to sustain a recovery.
Hence Mark Carney’s – Governor of the Bank of England – campaign for BAIL-IN … where 9% of depositors money be confiscated to support bank gambling losses.
MONSANTO/BAYER would want the world to believe that they were GIANTS.
And indeed this is what MainStream Media is for – to tel lies about how well everyone is doing.
But we know better –
Don’t we.
Taking the global currency to infinity:
It sounds great … hey .. money, money, lots & lots of filthy money, hooray !!
You get to create as much money as you a want.
The only problem is this.
For every dollar you create, there has to be that dollars worth of assets to cover its existence.
Or else it has no value.
There are not enough assets on planet Earth to cover the INFINITY currency that was created.
At some point things have to come back to reality.
Today – banks are very picky & choosy as to whom they lend.
Their very existence depends on it.
May a nation’s political arena will be out to borrow its next budgetary spend:
Wasteful governments will find it very difficult to raise the funds they WANT to continue to flounce around like aristocracy – this is for sure.
They have been wrapped in swaddling cloth till now –
MONSANTO left untold ruin left in its wake.
The Sydney law firm Turner James Hardie had quit its manufacture of asbestos in the early 1980s & attempted to leave its asbestos past behind.
James hardie twisted every which way to distance its current operations from its ongoing asbestos liabilities.
In 2001 the company established a Medical Research & Compensation Foundation (MRCF) with a total of $293 million in funds, saying that this fund would be able to meet all future asbestos claims.
James hardie then relocated its company off-shore to Holland, leaving behind the compensation fund which was found to have a massive financial shortfall.
I put it to you that MONSANTO has done the same in the hope of escaping its compensatory liabilities.
Main Stream Media has obviously kept as quiet as it can to assist in MONSANTO’s escaping their consequences.
I have NEVER believed the GMO expertise of MONSANTO – to me it was a con job/a pretend to corner the market.