Crazz Files

Exposing the Dark Truth of Our World

Queensland’s frontline workers begin legal challenges against vaccine mandates

Police, ambulance workers, nurses and more, all step up to challenge.


The first of several civil cases brought on by Queensland frontline workers challenging COVID-19 vaccine mandates, including police officers and paramedics, has begun in Brisbane.

More than 70 Queensland Police Service (QPS) and Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) staff who have refused to comply with their employer’s directives are testing the legality of the policies in the Supreme Court, arguing they are unjust or an improper exercise of power.

Some of the applicants, made up of three groups, have also claimed that similar directions made by the state’s Chief Health Officer last year breached human rights laws, but that matter will be heard at a later date alongside other similar legal challenges.

Queensland healthcare workers were required to have received two doses of the vaccine by December last year and the QPS staff deadline to be fully vaccinated was in January — unless an approved exemption was granted for medical and religious reasons, or exceptional circumstances.

The QAS mandate was ordered to ensure staff would ‘not pose a significant risk to patients and the broader community’, after determining COVID-19 had been shown to “disproportionately affect healthcare workers”.

The QPS said it introduced its mandate for similar public health reasons, as the nature of police work meant officers interacted with large numbers of people across the state.


During opening submissions today, Dr Christopher Ward — who represents the group of QAS staff — told the court the workers were being “singled out” by the policy, highlighting the fact that mandates had lifted in other industries.

He also argued vaccines had “no measure of effect” on reducing transmissibility of the Omicron variant.

“Restrictions on liberties for the overwhelming majority of the Queensland population have been relaxed,” he said.

“Yet this small group of employees remain subject to what we say was… unjustified interference on their liberties and employment.

He continued: “It could not be said in our submission either today nor in January ’22 that the virus disproportionately affected healthcare workers including paramedics in any sense of the word disproportionately.”

Dr. Ward said some of his clients had made exemption applications on various grounds including “significant” medical histories, religious objections, and concerns over the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

But he said many were still waiting for a decision.

“The exemptions on face value appear to address some of the legitimate concerns of this policy, but in practice they have been utterly ineffective,” Dr Ward told the court.

“The exemptions are not worth the paper they’re written on.”

Dan O’Gorman, who is representing one group of QPS staff, told the court the Queensland Police Commissioner’s directive was an “impractical compulsion” and in effect was asking his clients to “commit a criminal act”.

“They’re required to sign a statutory form saying that you give full and free permission to undertake the medical treatment,” he said.

“They couldn’t say to the doctor that they give their free consent… They would have to lie.”

The first trial is set down for five days and is expected to hear evidence from several witnesses, including infectious disease experts and Police Commissioner Katarina Carroll.

TOTT News will stay with this new development.


1 thought on “Queensland’s frontline workers begin legal challenges against vaccine mandates

  1. PROFESSOR OF LAW says Government Actions/ Mandates ARE UNLAWFUL.

    Genetic Modified – GLOBALRESEARCH.CA

    Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs

    Author Stephanie Seneff GregNigh Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos Peter A.McCullough

    June, 2022


    mRNA vaccines promote sustained synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

    The spike protein is neurotoxic, and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms.

    Suppression of type I interferon responses results in impaired innate immunity.

    The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.

    Codon optimization results in G-rich mRNA that has unpredictable complex effects.


    Full Paper >

    From Covid Medical Network

    Open Letter To Atagi, TGA and Federal Health Department

    Open letter addressed to A/Prof Crawford, Dr Murphy, Prof Kelly, Prof Skerritt, Hon Minister Hunt, members of ATAGI and ACV

    It comes from the combined effort of Australia’s leading clinical doctors, scientists,

    research academics, health care professionals, overseas specialists, and lawyers working together over many months.

    Here is the link to the Letter together with supporting Annexures:

    Read Full Letter >


    To conclude: The Australian Constitution explicitly prohibits any form of legal compulsion upon the medical profession to carry out any form of medication, including vaccination.

    In fact, no government, either federal or state, can impose compulsory vaccination in this country, or prevent medical practitioners from remaining entirely free to choose whether or not to provide certain medical services, including vaccination. Continued >

    Professor Zimmerman slams the Federal Government and States’ Covid Regime.

    Victoria Chief Health Officer Professor Brett Sutton has been given some terribly wrong advice about politicians and the public service being exempt from the Covid jab mandates.

    There is no provision in the Commonwealth Constitution expressly exempting a politician from anything. There is Sect 51, (xxiiiA) that prevents compulsory vaccination of all citizens but there are no exclusions for politicians.

    Professor Augusto Zimmerman likens the Covid performance of all governments to that of “totalitarian North Korea and Cuba.”

    Continued >

    Australia’s vaccine mandates: a violation of international law? – Moens and Zimmermann

    Gabriël A Moens AM and Augusto Zimmermann

    In summary, any Australian law that requires vaccine mandates either directly or indirectly, is not only constitutionally invalid, but it also constitutes a violation of Australia’s obligations under public international


    >> Also see Pages 25-26 of Information Paper >

    EXCELLENT EXPLANATION Of The World Economic Forum and lust for Global Totalitarianism

    The Australian Arm of The (WEF) World Economic Forum Revealed AUSTRALIA – Naming Young Global Leaders & Other Australians Tied To The WEF – Easy to Destroy Democracy with this > LOOK !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © Crazz Files | Newsphere by AF themes.