The same day that the Welsh idea came to our attention, the American journalist for vaccine dissidence, Alex Berenson, reminded his readers of what he went through, and who did it to him. It was the government!
Mr Berenson is currently in a legal battle with the Biden Administration over its (successful) attempt to ban him from social media platform X.
PARANOIA
“This isn’t paranoia. Hard evidence shows the White House and media targeted my right to speak – and support my family. If not for all of you, they would have succeeded. Yeah, I’m still angry,” he said.
“I haven’t forgotten. Or forgiven.
“Last week, a Congressional committee released an massive report detailing how the Biden Administration stampeded the First Amendment in 2021 during its doomed quest to force mRNA vaccines on every American adult.
“By July, with the mRNAs failing and COVID deaths rising, the White House privately and publicly attacked Facebook, trying to make the world’s biggest social media company censor jab critics.
“Facebook executives were furious – and worried about the Constitutional implications of the pressure they faced.
“Yes, a private company proved far more concerned about the First Amendment than the government officials sworn to uphold it.”
So, the truth owners who lie through their teeth destroy the lives of those who dare to … tell the truth.
There is a global war on the truth, in a post-truth age ruled by a ruling idea that there is only “your truth” and “my truth”.
Except that tyrannical Western governments only allow “their truth”. They are seeking to make “my truth” illegal. The emperor is, indeed, naked.
The Welsh proposal reminds me a little of the debate over the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption and its sister organisations in other Australian jurisdictions.
CORRUPT
Despite widely aired concerns about ICAC by legal figures like Chris Merritt (of the Rule of Law Education Centre) and Margaret Cunneen, I always come back to the position – if the politicians weren’t routinely and provably corrupt, we wouldn’t need an ICAC, would we?
The Welsh proposal is one thing. It turns out that we already have numerous safeguards against political lies. In theory, at any rate.
- Think of the media. Isn’t it their job to speak truth to power? I know, hilarious.
- Now we have social media, however, a blight on life in so many ways but at least a source of alternate news and views. Social media platforms must be working against the political class. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be trying everywhere to punish those outfits that don’t shut dissidents down.
- We have parliamentary committees. These are a source, potentially, of alternate voices of truth. Except that the major Parties largely control them, and so make them largely impotent.
- What about grassroots members of the major Parties? Just ask the likes of John Ruddick about the NSW Liberal Party. Party members are the eunuchs of the modern polity.
- Royal Commissions can work. Except that it is the political class that sets their terms of reference. The old political adage is, never establish an inquiry without first establishing its conclusions yourself.
- We have the academy, the paid truth-seekers. Well, now they are “fact checkers”. Err, next point.
- We have Freedom of Information. And thank God we do. Governments, those sources of truth, inevitably delay, obfuscate, hinder, find excuses and, well, cover up, in order to thwart FOI requests.
- We have whistleblowers. We know where they normally end up. See under Daniel Ellsberg, Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.
- Lastly, we have elections. Don’t they bring accountability, and its close relation, truth? Well, they don’t any more. The major function of elections these days is to allow the major Parties to claim false mandates. There is that political lying again. We could always just throw the liars out. Except we seem awfully bad at doing that. We always just swap one set of liars for another.
Safeguards of truth in practice? Not so much.
Perhaps we need something along the lines of the proposed Welsh model, after all.
Only extend it to include coverups as well. Lies of omission. Policy lies, too. Like the climate “emergency”. And the “pandemic”. And lies about pork barrelling.
Just imagine a truth commission where, in the spirit of recall elections, members of the public could call ministers, MPs, bureaucrats and others protected by misinformation legislation before a formal legal proceeding. And call witnesses. And put them under oath. Accountability 101, right there.
Such a system might just be needed, unless we can figure out ways of making the existing safeguards work a hell of a lot better.
Dramatically ratcheting up the status of government truth claims surely requires a commensurate upping of the standard of proof, n’est-ce pas?
Make them prove they are telling the truth.PC
– Paul Collits
Source: https://politicom.com.au/you-will-be-silenced-you-will-be-happy/