Dear…, are you aware that News Corp Australia has a serious conflict of interest in regards to its coverage of the current coronavirus situation, particularly articles relevant to vaccines and vaccination policy? This conflict of interest is not being disclosed on relevant articles, a serious lack of transparency.
The Murdoch Children’s Research Institute’s Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group (VIRGo) has received funding from vaccine companies GSK Biologicals, Seqirus, SanofiPasteur, Merck, Novavax and Janssen.
The original Murdoch institute was established in 1986 with the support of Rupert Murdoch’s mother, Dame Elisabeth Murdoch, and her family and others.
News Corp tabloids in Australia are very aggressive in their promotion of vaccine products. It was The Daily Telegraph and other News Corp tabloids that led the ‘No Jab, No Play’ campaign for coercive vaccination in Australia. The was subsequently obligingly adopted as policy across the political spectrum, i.e. by then leaders Tony Abbott, Bill Shorten and Richard Di Natale, and enacted as the No Jab, No Pay law in January 2016, under Malcolm Turnbull as Prime Minister.
I understand the No Jab, No Pay bill for coercive vaccination was raised in 2015 by Scott Morrison, who was Social Services Minister at the time.
The Federal No Jab, No Pay law, and subsequent State No Jab, No Play laws, mean that children have to be compliant to the vaccination schedule for early childhood, i.e. these are coercive vaccination laws which essentially make vaccination compulsory for most children to access benefits and childcare.
Of course, many people would argue children should have vaccine products to minimise infectious diseases. But it’s not that simple, as the No Jab, No Pay/No Play laws are forcing compliance without question, and destroying the ideal of ‘informed consent’ before a medical intervention. Children are now subject to an ever-increasing number of vaccinations and revaccinations on the children’s schedule, and there is no leeway to question the risks and benefits of each individual vaccine and revaccination.
Under both Coalition and Labor governments, the Australian National Immunisation Program schedule has grown in a sea of conflicts of interest, i.e. vaccine industry-associated academics are on the government committees which ‘recommend’ these vaccine products, and generally rubber-stamp them for the schedule. The vaccine industry has effectively hijacked Australian vaccination policy. Decisions made in Australia are also influencing vaccination policy internationally – consider the growth of the international vaccine market in recent years, from around $5.7 billion in 2002 to $46.88 billion in 2019, and projected to reach $104.87 billion by 2027.
s to be asked about vaccines, and I’m specifically interested in the live MMR second dose, varicella/chickenpox, whooping cough/pertussis, meningococcal B, HPV, annual flu vaccination, and all the aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine products. In light of the conflicts of interest, I want an independent and objective review of the entire schedule.
…, again, are you aware of News Corp’s conflict of interest I have outlined above?
There must be transparency and accountability because I suggest News Corp has been very influential on taxpayer-funded vaccination policy in Australia.
What is your position on this matter, is there not a case for exposure and investigation here?
1 thought on “News Corp Australia has a serious conflict of interest in regards to its coverage of the current coronavirus situation”
Murdock is a Zionist Jew, a covert one, and the Zionist lobby group have a strong influence on Australian politics via his media. It seems the only free speech we have in Australia is reserved to Murdock.
The Pharmaceutical industry supports Australian Governments and the payback is obvious….. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/25/pharmaceutical-industry-donates-millions-to-both-australian-political-parties
Our ex useless eater Mal Turnbull had some of his wealth in pharmaceutical corporations so the reason for his drive for mandatory vaccines is apparent.
We never read in the Murdock media that some 4.2 billion dollars have already been paid out through claimants in the vaccine compensation court. Nor do we read of the difficulty just to get a case heard due to the filtering imposed by Mr Pharmers highly paid lawyers so spare a thought for the misery incurred by vaccines to the people who cannot get a hearing and must suffer this scourge at their own expense.
If compensation was legitimate then the payout would be in the tens of billions.
So much for safe vaccines and when you look back to that Murdock journalist, Clare Harvey, attacking Australian parents who, as any parent would do, ask questions about vaccine safety, called them terrorists. A charge of hate speech would not have been enough.
News Corp Australia most certainly has a serious conflict of interest but with our politicians snug in Murdocks pockets to seek transparency is akin to pissing into the wind.