Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARS-CoV-2/covid-19?
For the attention of:
Sir Charles Walker
Conservative MP for Broxbourne
Joint Vice-Chair 1922 Committee
Dear Sir Charles
Further to Emma McArthur’s email addressed to you and your parliamentary colleagues and others, subsequently published as an article on The Conservative Woman titled: Why discard the pandemic plan in favour of a senseless lockdown?
In her email, Emma McArthur notes “A recent estimate of the global infection rate for COVID-19 is 0.15%, which is not dissimilar to influenza. Yet, the British Government, along with the rest of the world, continues to respond to this respiratory virus as if it is Ebola, taking away fundamental human rights in the process”. She also notes “The British Government itself stated on 19 March 2020 that COVID-19 was not a high consequence infectious disease…”
Sir Charles, the UK-led response to SARS-CoV-2/covid-19 has had a massive impact around the world, particularly the influence of the modelling by Neil Ferguson et al, Imperial College London, see for example their Report 9, dated 16 March 2020, which recommends a ‘suppression’ strategy which “will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available (potentially 18 months or more)…”
Sir Charles, can you please help me discover who decided on a global vaccination response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, i.e.
- Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against a virus which it was already known wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
- How was this plan evaluated and by whom?
- Where is the public record?
These are questions I have asked recently of Professor Andrew Pollard, who is both the Chief Investigator on the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine trials, and the Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation…a stunning conflict of interest!
Please see below my email thread to Professor Pollard, in which I also question why children were included in the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine trials when it was known from the beginning that children, and most others, weren’t at serious risk with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Sir Charles, can you please help me obtain answers to my questions, which are relevant for the entire world?
The grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted global response to SARS-CoV-2, which has been very much influenced by the UK Johnson Government and SAGE, has had a disastrous impact on global society and the global economy.
It’s time for independent and objective retrospective critical analysis of the astonishing events of the past 18 months – how has this happened?!
The enactment of ’emergency laws’ in the UK and around the world has swept away our rights, it’s been shocking to discover there are no checks and balances to protect us from this abuse of power in our so-called ‘liberal democracies’.
Who can we rely upon to investigate this matter, certainly the ‘fourth estate’, the mainstream media, particularly the licence payer-funded BBC, has been a devastating failure in shining a light on this destructive affair, and indeed has acted largely as a propaganda arm for the Johnson Government. With a non-existent Opposition (Labour party) in the UK, and a compliant fear-mongering media, the Johnson Government has not been held to account. This is a similar experience around the world, including in Australia where I live. We are living in an Orwellian situation, facing a future of surveillance, control, and lockdowns, and coercive isolation, testing, masking and vaccination. Our political systems are broken and not working for the people, something is seriously wrong.
Sir Charles, please carefully consider my email to you, and my emails to Professor Pollard, see email thread below.
I request your assistance in obtaining transparency and accountability. Members of the UK Parliament have an ethical duty to challenge the leaders of the arguably rogue Johnson Government, and act to address this catastrophe which continues to reverberate around the world.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
For the attention of:
Professor Andrew Pollard
Chief Investigator on the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine trials
Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation
Dear Professor Pollard
Why were children included in the Oxford/AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine trials?
It was reported in May 2020 that “most paediatric cases with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection are mild; severe COVID-19 disease in children is rare”. *
It was known from the beginning that children weren’t at serious risk with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, why were they included in covid-19 vaccine trials?
To vaccinate people at an early age with what potentially could be annual coronavirus vaccination throughout life, with unknown long-term cumulative consequences, raises important ethical questions, particularly when they are not at serious risk of disease.
Professor Pollard, I first asked you about this last year, in an email dated 20 June 2020, see email below. But you did not respond.
I also asked this question in my BMJ rapid response: Is it ethical to include children in the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine trials? 5 February 2021.
Professor Pollard, the Helsinki Declaration states: “Medical research involving human subjects may only be conducted if the importance of the objective outweighs the risks and burdens to the research subjects.”
As children do not appear to be at serious risk with SARS-CoV-2, in my opinion the risks and burdens for them participating in covid-19 vaccine trials outweigh the importance of the objective of the medical research, particularly as the plan is for children in general society to be vaccinated, when this appears to not be appropriate.
Why were any age groups not at serious risk of the SARS-CoV-2 virus included in the covid-19 vaccine trials?
And, most importantly…who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against a virus which it was already known wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
How was this plan evaluated and by whom?
Where is the public record?
I request your urgent response Professor Pollard, these are important matters of public interest. See my previous email to you below.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
