Why Poisoning Is Profitable

Rationale for Industrial Poisoning
The fundamental concept for industrial toxicology is attributed to the pharmacologist Paracelsus, “Toxicity is only a matter of dosage.” Toxicologists who represent the polluting industries claim there are no toxins, no poisons, that there are only dosages. Water and arsenic are virtually the same. That view benefits polluting industries.
Paracelsus was a pharmacologist, declared insane centuries ago, lost in the dust-bin of history. He was dug up and refurbished to support industrial dogmatism.
“Toxicology” has become a misnomer, as today, toxicologists are actually dosologists. Down their nose, they sarcastically refer to “poison”, as if they know something better.
Industrial toxicologists claim toxic compounds are beneficial to life forms that ingest them. Below, Hayes and Laws, and other writers, promote that idea with a noble tone. They can be deconstructed to an admission that, “Toxicity can increase profits if surreptitiously applied to others.”
Arsenic has no known nutritional benefit. Water is essential to life. Low dose arsenic is a toxic drug that destabilizes and accelerates the victim towards a torturous death. Arsenic’s momentary high is sold by medicos as a “cure” or “treatment”. Pharmacologists sell other poisons as a cure for arsenic’s inevitable health damage.
Dosologists call high-dose water a “poison”, but the resulting ill-health is by forced mechanical application to the subject. That process is not poisoning. If a ladder falls on you, it is not an overdose. Such stupidity is foisted upon the world by professors. Students pay much to learn dosology, as if it were toxicology.
Here are my analyses of various items from pages 59 and 232 in the Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, Hayes and Laws, 1991 (bolding is mine):
Hayes and Laws are typical of ongoing claims that cancer and tumour growth are “mysteries.” So, I’ll provide what I see as a realistic view of the approximate relation between poisons and their various effects.
Huge tracts of land are sprayed with malathion, ostensibly to kill medflies. Cities in Florida and the New York City region have been aerially sprayed with malathion to kill medflies or mosquitoes. However, expert testimony has called these events “scientifically corrupt.”
The entire cities of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and recently (1999) New York and surrounding regions have been blanketed (approximately 35 tons of malathion on NYC region) with malathion by helicopters, to supposedly ward off viral epidemics.
Is the spraying of cities a way of stimulating human activity and production, as a chicken farmer may poison his animals to stimulate tissue growth in the form of increased poundage of tumour-laden chicken flesh and salmonella-laden eggs? Is this a mere trick to make a profit off of a public that has been convinced that these products are of quality? Obviously such products, such a way of life, have a bearing on the cancer and disease that has become prevalent worldwide.
The farmer is playing a trick to gain a profit. But he poisons himself and his family. However, the corporate owners of large farms do not live near the farms, and may be convinced that their profit makes it worthwhile. Maybe they have deceived themselves, as successful people do, into believing the world was made for them, until the day arrives, as it does so often in contemporary times, when they and their intimates die of cancer and they are then contacted by the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute (which regularly investigates the biographical profiles of wealthy individuals) to donate for “cancer research”, an industry which is intimately tied to the toxin industry. I have interviewed several persons who worked in Sloan-Kettering’s fund-raising department.
Toynbee (quoted by Hayes and Laws) is not the only educated Brit to advocate a “sufficient challenge” to humanity. Bertrand Russell wrote in Power (1938):
“Mankind need government, but in regions where anarchy has prevailed they will, at first, submit only to despotism. We must therefore seek first to secure government, even though despotic, and only when government has become habitual can we hope successfully to make it democratic.”
“Anarchy” is a relative term, and “government” might consider any adversariality or lethargy as anarchy, and thus feel rationally justified to use despotic means.
Russell continues with,
“[For] a sense of solidarity sufficient to make government… outside pressure is all but indispensable… A common peril is much the easiest way of producing homogenity.”
Related concepts from Sun Tzo, The Art Of War
“The Way means inducing the people to have the same aim as the leadership, so that they will share death and share life, without fear of danger.” [Wang Xi, p43]
and,
“A military operation has no standard form – it goes by way of deception.” [Cao Cao, p49]
Russell, however, feels that government is secure:
“Most people feel that politics is difficult, and that they had better follow a leader – they feel this just as instinctively and unconsciously as do dogs with their masters.”
U.S. Federal Law
Mass poisoning legalized in the U.S. I’m not a legal expert. Perhaps others can shed light better on this.
TITLE 50 – WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE Page 166 | ||
§1520. Use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by Department of Defense: accounting to Congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies: notification of local civilian officials. | ||
a) Not later than thirty days after final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense, whether directly or under contract. involving the use of human subjects for the testing of chemical or biological agents, the Secretary of Defense shall supply the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives with a full accounting of such plans for such experiment or study, and such experiment or study may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date such accounting is received by such committees. | ||
b)(1) The Secretary of Defense may not conduct any test or experiment involving the use of any chemical or biological agent on civilian populations unless local civilian officials in the area in which the test or experiment is to be conducted are notified in advance of such test or experiment, and such test or experiment may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date of such notification. | ||
(2) Paragraph (1) shall apply to tests and experiments conducted by Department of Defense personnel and tests and experiments conducted on behalf of the Department of Defense by contractors. | ||
(Pub. L. 95-79. title VIII. §808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 97-375, title II. 203(a(1) Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1822.) | ||
(Pub. L. 95-79. title VIII. §808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 97-375, title II. 203(a(1) Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1822.) |
Related code:
CODIFICATION Section was not enacted as part of Pub. L. 91-121. title IV, § 409, Nov. 19, 1969. 83 Stat. 209, which comprises this chapter. AMENDMENTS 1982 — Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97-375 strike out par. (1) which directed the Secretary or Defense to supply not later than Oct. 1 of each year the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House with a full accounting of all experiments and studies conducted by the Department of Defense in the preceding twelve month period, whether directly or under contract which involved the use of human subjects for the testing of chemical or biological agents, and designated par. (2) as subsec. (a).
As of 1997, there was argument against the above code and it was eventually repealed and substituted with alternative code:
Sec. 1520. Repealed. Pub. L. 105-85, div. A, title X, Sec. 1078(g), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1916 US Code as of: 01/26/98 Sec. 1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents (a) Prohibited activities The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract) – (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects. (b) Exceptions Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes: (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity. (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents. (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control. (c) Informed consent required The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject. (d) Prior notice to Congress Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees. (e) ”Biological agent” defined In this section, the term ”biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing – (1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; (2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or (3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
Note the apparent loophole phrases: “(b) Exceptions”, the words, “research activity” and “therapeutic” (compare with Hayes and Laws definitions herein).
Note that the code applies to “test or experiment”. What if the intended mass poisoning is not a test or experiment, but a well-planned social manipulation for the benefit of society?
What if the “biological agent” is defined as harmless and the intent is not physical dysfunction, but social behavior improvements?
The statute limits the “Secretary of Defense”. Apparently then, it doesn’t apply to anyone else, or any other agency.
What if physical “dysfunction” or “therapeutic” is defined not per the individual but in terms of the society as a whole?
With such loose wording, the only recourse for the poisoned masses would be to argue on the basis that the spirit of the law has been violated and hope that the spirit can be agreed upon. Else prove that social benefits have not been proved.
What if the passing of the law AND its repeal were itself conceived as a “small dosage”, a psychological experiment, a propagandistic toxin, utilized to provide a “sufficient but not overwhelming challenge” to society.
For centuries now a oligarchical, set aside, group have used mans energy and creativity to obtain wealth and power for themselves.
Today, that wealth has reached massive proportions outperforming all other human efforts to seek the daily bread.
This oligarchical energy is satanic and through world wars and destruction have promoted their power and wealth using fear.
All the massive polluting Corporations are controlled by this group including the Military plus Governments so the pollution is not yours but theirs as human sickness is profitable.
HAARP programs, Directed Energy assaults on humans, Chemtrails and over 2000 exploded nuclear bombs are just a few of the destructive programs this Satanic power have forced upon us yet their filthy, evil media blames us for the aftermath pollution.
We see Climate Change being promoted as a result of humans yet Climate Change has been occurring on Planet Earth for Millenia now and long before, as the records show, cars and coal.
We all need to ask many questions before we accept the fake news shoved up our noses daily.
Just for the record of the crap being dished out….. the worlds population is on the decline and will not reach the forecast eleven plus billion the controlled experts have promoted via Governments and media.
Just go and ask questions and you will surely scrape the bullshit from the truth.